CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP
Summary
CLAIM ID: 26H9-2VPP Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 172 Entered on FLSD Docket 12)18/2009 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN am Defendants. JOINT NOTICE OF RF,SOLUTION/SETTLEMENT Plaintiff, and Defendant(s), JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, jointly give Notice to the Court that the Panics have resolved the above-styled action. The Parties further stipulate that all pending Motions are moot and no further Court action is required. The Parties are in the process of finalizing the settlement and will file a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice and Proposed Order upon completing all documents related to the agreed resolution/settlement. Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record
Persons Referenced (3)
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/13/2009 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON C.M.A., Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, Defendants. PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CAUSE OF ACTION, AND MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT; MOTION TO STRIKE, AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW The Plaintiff, C.M.A., by and through undersigned counsel, files this Response to Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's, Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Cause of Action, and Motion for More Definite Statement; and Motion to Strike (D.E. 47). As a preliminary matter, the Plaintiff submits that she has pled sufficient factual bases to support the 31 claims set forth against the Defendant in this case. In this Court's Opinion and Order on Motion to Dismiss and Mot
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of 40 EXHIBIT 16 EFTA00081180 Case 9:08-cv-807m091349pept Z91-15 _EriterM ocp WERocisstifolf/E15 Page 2 of roio-< uoc 16q0,3 e 0 EXHIBIT C Epstein vs. Edwards Undisputed Statement of Facts EFTA00081181 Case 9:08-cv-807ailaVs kigsyffigt 28415-c1p6Arger phri N 7NRocieatgfe)10/§815 Page 3 of IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No.: 50 2009 CA 040800XXXKMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY I EDWARDS, individually, Defendants, STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS Defendant Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., offers the following specific facts as the undisputed material facts in this case. Each of the following facts is numbered separately and individually to facilitate Epstein's required compliance with Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c) ("The adverse party shall identify . . . any summary judgment evidence on wh
0338E903Etek.888893941AAAA ODCIKNOM03712 En
0338E903Etek.888893941AAAA ODCIKNOM03712 En 1'€10 ikaPRPFAftikW54/4/(1809 Pander)! !24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON C.M. A., Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, Defendants, Defendant. Jeffrey Epstein's Motion To Stay And Or Continue Action For Time Certain Based On Parallel Civil And Criminal Proceedinas With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN") by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby moves this Court for the entry of an order staying or continuing this action for a time certain (i.e., until late 2010 when the NPA expires), pursuant to the application of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the fact that a parallel proceeding is ongoing and being investigated. In support of his motion, EPSTEIN states: I. Introduction At the outset, EPSTEIN notes this Court's prior Order, dated December 16, 2008, (Document 28), in which this
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 65 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion To Stay And Or Continue Action For Time Certain Based On Parallel Civil And Criminal Proceedings With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN") by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby moves this Court for the entry of an order staying or continuing this action for a time certain (i.e., until late 2010 when the NPA expires), pursuant to the application of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the fact that a parallel proceeding is ongoing and being investigated. In support of his motion, EPSTEIN states: I. Introduction At the outset, EPSTEIN notes this Court's prior Order, (DE 33), in which this Court denied a motion for stay brought by Def
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA
Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-0 I 1789 EFTA00192835 Memorandum Subjeci Operation Leap Year: Notification of Breach USAO No. 2006R0 181 June 9, 2009 To Jeffrey H. Sloman Acting United States Attorney Robert K. Senior First Assistant U.S. Attorney Rolando Garcia Deputy Chief, Criminal Division, West Palm Beach Karen Atkinson, Chief Chief, Criminal Section I, Northern Division, WPB From A. Marie Villafan AUSA, Ft Laude INTRODUCTION. This memorandum seeks approval to serve the attached letter providing notice of a breach of the Non-Prosecution Agreement on attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein. On Friday, June 12, 2009, Judge Marra will be presiding ova a hearing on Jeffrey Epstein's motions to stay all of the civil lawsuits filed against him by victims identified through our investigation. In his Order setting the matter for a hearing, Judge Marra stated: This hearing shall be limited to the issue of whether Defendant Epstein's defense of the civil actions filed against h
Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 121 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. PLAINTIFF, MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING RECORDS OF DOMINIQUE HYPPOLITEISCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL, ST. MARY'S HOSPITAL, FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY AND GLORIA C. HAKKARAINEN, M.D. Plaintiff , by and through her undersigned attorneys, hereby files her Motion For Protective Order Regarding Records of Dominique Hyppolite/School District of Palm Beach County, Good Samaritan Hospital, St. Mary's Hospital, Florida Atlantic University and Gloria C. Hakkarainen, M.D., and in support there of states as follows: 1. This is an action to recover money damages against Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for acts of sexual abuse and prostitution committed upon the then- minor, 2. On June 1, 2009, Defendant, Jeffrey
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.