Subject:
Summary
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: atam mmo= asem Re: U.S. v. Maxwel Sunday, July 12, 2020 4:59:52 PM M, that's correct. Thanks. On Jul .2 ) .4,e (USANYS) wrote: Thanks again for giving me a call a few minutes ago, and for updating us on the view of your client with respect to bail. As discussed, I understand that believes that Maxwell should not be granted bail, and that while she does not wish to make a specific statement—either directly, through counsel, or through the Government conveying or reading a statement—that we should and will, consistent with her rights under the CVRA, convey to the court her opposition. Please let us know if I've misunderstood any of this, otherwise we'll include it for our filing tomorrow, and thanks again for being in touch. Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of New York 3509-017 Page I of 1 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00007049 EFTA00158528
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.