Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00159178DOJ Data Set 9Other

PROFFER AGREEMENT

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00159178
Pages
2
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

PROFFER AGREEMENT With respect to the meeting of David Rodgers ("Client") and his attorney, Brendan Quigley, Esq., with Assistant United States Attorneys to be held at the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York on February 7, 2020 ("the meeting"), the following understandings exist: (1) THIS IS NOT A COOPERATION AGREEMENT. The Client has agreed to provide the Government with information, and to respond to questions, so that the Government may evaluate Client's information and responses in making prosecutive decisions. By receiving Client's proffer, the Government does not agree to make a motion on the Client's behalf or to enter into a cooperation agreement, plea agreement, immunity or non-prosecution agreement. The Government makes no representation about the likelihood that any such agreement will be reached in connection with this proffer. (2) In any prosecution brought against Client by this Office, except as provided below the Gover

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
PROFFER AGREEMENT With respect to the meeting of David Rodgers ("Client") and his attorney, Brendan Quigley, Esq., with Assistant United States Attorneys to be held at the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York on February 7, 2020 ("the meeting"), the following understandings exist: (1) THIS IS NOT A COOPERATION AGREEMENT. The Client has agreed to provide the Government with information, and to respond to questions, so that the Government may evaluate Client's information and responses in making prosecutive decisions. By receiving Client's proffer, the Government does not agree to make a motion on the Client's behalf or to enter into a cooperation agreement, plea agreement, immunity or non-prosecution agreement. The Government makes no representation about the likelihood that any such agreement will be reached in connection with this proffer. (2) In any prosecution brought against Client by this Office, except as provided below the Government will not offer in evidence on its case-in-chief, or in connection with any sentencing proceeding for the purpose of determining an appropriate sentence, any statements made by Client at the meeting, except (a) in a prosecution for false statements, obstruction of justice or perjury with respect to any acts committed or statements made during or after the meeting or testimony given after the meeting; or (b) if, at any time following the meeting, Client becomes a fugitive from justice. (3) Notwithstanding item (2) above: (a) the Government may use information derived directly or indirectly from the meeting for the purpose of obtaining leads to other evidence, which evidence may be used in any prosecution of Client by the Government; (b) in any prosecution brought against Client, the Government may use statements made by Client at the meeting and all evidence obtained directly or indirectly therefrom for the purpose of cross-examination should Client testify; and (c) the Government may also use statements made by Client at the meeting to rebut any evidence or arguments offered by or on behalf of Client (including arguments made or issues raised sua soonte by the District Court) at any stage of the criminal prosecution (including bail, all phases of trial, and sentencing) in any prosecution brought against Client. (4) The Client understands and agrees that in the event the Client seeks to qualify for a reduction in sentence under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3553(f), United States Sentencing Guidelines, Sections 2D1.1(b)(18) or 5C1.2, or Fed. It. Crim. P. 35(b), the Office may offer or use at any stage of the criminal proceeding any statement made by Client during the meeting, and all evidence obtained directly or indirectly therefrom, to the extent such use is consistent with Section 402 of the First Step Act of 2018. (5) To the extent that the Government is entitled under this Agreement to offer in evidence any statements made by Client or leads obtained therefrom, Client shall assert no claim under the United States Constitution, any statute, Rule 410 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, or any other federal rule that such statements or any leads therefrom should be suppressed. It is the intent of this Agreement to waive all rights in the foregoing respects. 01.141019 3523-017 Page I of 2 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFFA_00008985 EFTA00159178 (6) If this Office receives a request from another prosecutor's office for arrest to information obtained pursuant to this Proffer Agreement, this Office may furnish such information but will do, so only on the condition that the requesting office honor the provisions of this Agreement. (7) It is further understood that this Agreement is limited to the statements made by Client at the meeting and does not apply to any oral, written or recorded statements made by Client at any other time. No understandings, promises, agreements and/or conditions have been entered into with respect to the meeting other than those set forth in this Agreement and none will be entered into unless in writing and signed by all parties. (8) The understandings set forth in paragraphs I through 7 above extend to the continuation of this meeting on the dates that appear below. (9) Client and Attorney acknowledge that they have fully discussed and understand every paragraph and clause in this Agreement and the consequences thereof. Dated: New York, New York GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney for the Attorney for Client Dates of Continuation Initials of counsel, Client. AUSA, witness 01.14.2019 3523-017 Page 2 of 2 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFFA_00008986 EFTA00159179

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFBI ReportNov 11, 2025

Extensive FBI & Palm Beach Police Investigation Links Jeffrey Epstein to Underage Sexual Abuse, Payments, and High‑Profile Associates

The compiled documents provide a wealth of actionable intelligence: detailed victim and witness statements describing under‑age massages and sexual assaults; financial transaction records (cash paymen Victims (girls aged 14‑17) were recruited with promises of $200‑$300 per massage and were repeatedly Trash pulls from 358 El Brillo Way yielded message books containing names, dates, phone numbers, a

240p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com" <brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com>

From: "brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com" <brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com> To: Cc: , < Subject: RE: David Rodgers Subpoena Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 02:23:57 +0000 Thank you. From: Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2020 9:23 PM To: Quigley, Brendan <brendan.quigley@bakerbotts.com> Cc: Subject: Re: David Rodgers Subpoena [EXTERNAL EMAIL] That should be fine, thanks. On Feb 4, 2020, at 9:03 PM, "brendan.quigley_@bakerbotts.com" <brendan.quigleyBbakerbotts.com> wrote: Any chance we could aim for 9:30? From: Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2020 7:51 PM To: Quigley, Brendan <brendan.quigley_@bakerbotts.com>. Cc: Subject: RE: David Rodgers Subpoena cfl [EXTERNAL EMAIL] We'd like to go through a good chunk of the records on Friday, so it would probably be best to block off 3 hours just in case. Would going until 1pm work for you, or would you rather start earlier? Thanks, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 St. Andrew's Plaza New York NY 10007 EFTA00

8p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: David Rodgers

Fromi To: Subject: David Rodgers Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 22:34:01 +0000 Importance: Normal Team, Just so everyone is in the loop, I got a call from David Rodgers' attorney (in response to our email requesting an interview). Rodgers wants to be cooperative and will come in for an interview, but he is currently on a cruise, and his lawyers will need to talk to/meet with him after he gets back. They think late January/early February is a good timeframe to aim for. We discussed logistics (because his attorneys are here in NYC), and they want us to fly him up, which shouldn't be a problem. We'll check in with his attorney in a week or so and let you know. Alison Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 EFTA00153496

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Times: How a Ring of Women Allegedly Recruited Girls for Jeffrey Epstein

From: Subject: Times: How a Ring of Women Allegedly Recruited Girls for Jeffrey Epstein Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 19:19:07 +0000 Inline-Images: image001.jpg; image002.jpg; image003.jpg; image004.jpg; image005.jpg; image006.jpg; image007.jpg How a Ring of Women Allegedly Recruited Girls for Jeffrey Epstein After Mr. Epstein's suicide, his inner circle of girlfriends, employees and other associates is now under scrutiny by prosecutors. EFTA00040611 EFTA00040612 Imag Sarah Kellen, left, and Ghislaine Maxwell, have been accused in lawsuits of helping Jeffrey Epstein recruit teenage girls and young women for sex.CreditCreditPatrick McMullan, via Getty Images By Amy Julia Harris, Frances Robles, Mike Baker and William K. Rashbaum Aug. 29, 2019, 2:54 p.m. ET EFTA00040613 [What you need to know to start the day: Get New York Today in your Haley Robson was a 16-year-old South Florida high school student when an acquaintance from school approached her at a local pool with an intr

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

USANYS)"

To: Cc: ' " , USANYS)" Subject: RE: FAA Question Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 14:42:10 +0000 Importance: Normal HMI I hope all's well. We've had a chance to review the records, and we'd like to learn more about one aircraft in particular. From our conversation, it sounds like the best next step is to contact the title companies involved. Can you help us identify the right title companies for the below aircraft? Thanks, ** On December 30, 2008, Sikosrksy Aircraft helicopter, S-76C-2, serial number 760750, tail number N750A was sold to; Air Ghislaine Inc 103 Fould Road, #202 Wilmington, Delaware 19803 302-636-1956 The registrant was Larry VISOSKI, he signed as Director of Aviation On February 11, 2010, Air Ghislaine Inc changed their name to Shmitka Air Inc. In March 2010, Air Ghislaine Inc changed the tail number from N750A to N722JE. On the 8050-64 the signature is not legibile but it looks similar to the signature of Lawrence VISOSKI. He signed as Director of Operatio

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

FD.30.2(Ftev.5440

FD.30.2(Ftev.5440 -1 of 3- FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION LARRY VISOSKI, date of birth (DOB) oweammy 11/17/2020 was interviewed via video conference call. Present during the call were FBI Special Agents and , Assistant United States Attorney , and VISOSKI's attorneys GLEN MCGORTY, DANIELLE GIFFUNI, and DANIEL 2ELENKO. After being advised of the identities of the interviewing Agents and the nature of the interview, VISOSKI provided the following information: VISOSKI was hired in the mid-1990s as a pilot for JEFFREY EPSTEIN. VISOSKI was the lower ranking of the two pilots EPSTEIN employed and was in charge of maintenance of the aircraft. VISOSKI's main job was flying EPSTEIN's airplane, but VISOSKI also flew EPSTEIN's helicopter. EPSTEIN's helicopter stayed in St. Thomas year round except for a once a year flight back to Palm Beach, Florida for annual maintenance. VISOSKI did not work for anyone else while he was employed by EPSTEIN. VISOSKI flew to St. Thomas two or

3p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.