Tue, 21 Sep 2021 9:17:59 PM (UTC)
Summary
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 9:17:59 PM (UTC) Sent: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 9:17:58 PM (UTC) Subject: Call with Susan Shelling From: To: Call with Susan Shelling • Consor & Associates was sold, US Legal Services • Could recognize her signature at the time — it was just a scroll. • Has destroyed all her notes. The original and a copy would go out to the attorneys involved. She sends her transcriptions to the company, which turns it into a full formal transcript. • She doesn't have a copy of the full transcript and no longer has her notes. Andrew Rohrbach Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 Saint Andrews Plaza New York, New York 10007 1212) 637-2345 (646) 627-0926 3525-001 Page 1 of I SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00009660 EFTA00159468
Persons Referenced (3)
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Subject:
From: Sent: To: Subject: Tuesday. November 30.2021 7:39 PM Call with Paul Kane 11/30/21 call with Paul Kane Gary Stein (counsel for Kane) Keni Ukabiala (counsel for Kane) • Prep for testimony • Records that go into student permanent files are added at time of creation • Record retention policy not as strict in the 90s • Form comes from PCS, generally filled out by parent. After receipt, reviewed by admissions director, then standard family visit, then admissions decision • In 1990s, would verify at least some information on the application (parent name, contact info) Andrew Rohrbach Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York 1 Saint Andrews Plaza New York, New York 10007 (212) 637-2345 (646) 627-0926 1 3519-004 Page 1 of I SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00008355 EFTA00159068
Court Filing: 538
The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, proposing a joint limiting instruction regarding Government Exhibit 52 in the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case. The proposed instruction restricts the consideration of the exhibit to showing a link between Maxwell and the information contained within. The letter is signed by Damian Williams and several Assistant United States Attorneys.
The United States Attorney's office, led by Damian Williams, submitted a government briefing on Nove...
The United States Attorney's office, led by Damian Williams, submitted a government briefing on November 15, 2021, in case 2020-cr-00008. The defense is required to respond thereafter. The filing was made by Assistant United States Attorneys Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.
Court Filing: 372
The document is a letter from the United States Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the jury selection process in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government requests clarification on when the parties will be provided with the names of prospective jurors and suggests that peremptory challenges be exercised at the conclusion of voir dire. The government argues that providing juror names weeks in advance is not necessary and could be unusual.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x 20 Cr. 330 (MN) REPLY MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION UNDER THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE TO SUPPRESS ALL EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE GOVERNMENT'S SUBPOENA TO BOLES SCHILLER AND TO DISMISS COUNTS FIVE AND SIX Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York, NY 10011 Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell EFTA00077571 Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Authorities ii Table of Exhibits iv Introduction and Summary of the Argument 1 I. The Facts 2 II. The Government's Response to Maxwell's Motion. 6 A. The Government's Defenses Are Not Credible. 7 B. Assuming the Government's De
To: Cindy Hopkins
From: To: Cindy Hopkins Cc: usdoj.gov>, "Rohrbach, Andrew ( U SAN YS)" <Andrew. Rohrbach@ usdoj.gov> Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - RE: Sunpoena Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 18:28:13 +0000 Importance: Normal Good afternoon, Thank you very much for reaching out. I will call you at the number you provided as soon as I am out of meetings for the day. Best, Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York From: Cindy Hopkins < Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2021 2:26 PM To: Subject: Sunpoena Hi this is Cindy Hopkins responding to your subpoena in the US vs Maxwell case. Please contact me at t your convenience. EFTA00155163
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.