Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00159723DOJ Data Set 9Other

PROFFER AGREEMENT

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00159723
Pages
2
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

PROFFER AGREEMENT With respect to the meeting of Lawrence Visoski CI ent") and his attorney, Glen McGorty, Esq., with Assistant United States Attorney :o be held by video conference at the Office of the United Slates Attorney for the Southern Distri a of New York on October 7, 2020 ("the meeting"), the following understandings exist: (I) THIS IS NOT A COOPERATION AGREEMEN f. The Client has agreed to provide the Government with information, and to respond to qua dons, so that the Government may evaluate Client's information and responses in making prosy utive decisions. By receiving Client's proffer, the Government does not agree to make a motion o t the Client's behalf or to enter into a cooperation agreement, plea agreement, immunity or non prosecution agreement. The Government makes no representation about the likelihood that any t uch agreement will be reached in connection with this proffer. (2) in any prosecution brought against Client by this Office except as provid

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
PROFFER AGREEMENT With respect to the meeting of Lawrence Visoski CI ent") and his attorney, Glen McGorty, Esq., with Assistant United States Attorney :o be held by video conference at the Office of the United Slates Attorney for the Southern Distri a of New York on October 7, 2020 ("the meeting"), the following understandings exist: (I) THIS IS NOT A COOPERATION AGREEMEN f. The Client has agreed to provide the Government with information, and to respond to qua dons, so that the Government may evaluate Client's information and responses in making prosy utive decisions. By receiving Client's proffer, the Government does not agree to make a motion o t the Client's behalf or to enter into a cooperation agreement, plea agreement, immunity or non prosecution agreement. The Government makes no representation about the likelihood that any t uch agreement will be reached in connection with this proffer. (2) in any prosecution brought against Client by this Office except as provided below the Government will not offer in evidence on its case-in-chief, or in e innection with any sentencing proceeding for the purpose of determining an appropriate sentence, my statements made by Client at the meeting, except (a) in a prosecution for false statements, of struction of justice or perjury with respect to any acts committed or statements made during or fter the meeting or testimony given after the meeting; or (b) if, at any time following the meet; tg, Client becomes a fugitive from justice. (3) Notwithstanding item (2) above: (a) the Government directly or indirectly from the meeting for the purpose of obtaining evidence may be used in any prosecution of Client by the Cover brought against Client, the Government may use statements made t evidence obtained directly or indirectly therefrom for the purpose Client testify; and (c) the Government may also use statements ma rebut any evidence or arguments offered by or on behalf of Client issues raised ma ;polite by the District Court) at any stage of the c bail, all phases of trial, and sentencing) in any prosecution brought may use information derived cads to other evidence, which meet; (b) in any prosecution y Client at the meeting and all of cross-examination should le by Client at the meeting to including arguments made or iminal prosecution (including igainst Client (4) The Client understands and agrees that in the event thi Client seeks to qualify for a reduction in sentence order Title 18, United States C-MP, Se t1on 3553(f), United States Sentencing Guidelines, Sections 2D1.1(b)(18) or 5C1.2, or Fed. IL :rim. P. 35(b), the Office may offer or use at any stage of the criminal proceeding any atateme it made by Client during the meeting, and all evidence obtained directly or indirectly therefh m, to the extent such use is consistent with Section 4O2 of the First Step Act of 2018. (5) To the extent that the Government is entitled wader this i greement to offer in evidence any statements made by Client or leads obtained therefrom, Client hall assert no claim under the United States Constitution, any statute, Rule 410 of the Federal RI les of Evidence, or any other federal rule that such statements or any leads therefrom should be oppressed it is the intent of this Agreement to waive all rights in the foregoing respects. 01.142019 3527-Ol I Page I of 2 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_000 1005 1 EFTA00159723 (6) If this Office receives a request from another pro: ecutor's office for access to information obtained pursuant to this Proffer Agreement, this Offic may furnish such information but will do so only on the condition that the requesting office honor the provisions of this Agreement. (7) It is further understood that this Agreement is limited to the statements made by Cheat at the meeting and does not apply to any oral, written or recorder statements made by Client at any other nine. No understandings, promises, agreements and/or conditions have been entered into with respect to the meeting other than those set forth in this Agreement and noise will be entered into unless in writing and signed by all parties. (8) The understandings set forth in paragraphs I through 7 al ore extend to the continuation of this meeting on the dates that appear below. (9) Client and Attorney acknowledge that they have fully d scussal and understand every paragraph and clause in this Agreement and the consequences then of. Dated: New York, New York AUDREY ST1 AUSS Acting United items Attorney for the Southern Distr et of New York Attorney for Chem Dates of Continuation 1 1/ 12/2 01 0 br Mains= Unite Mars Almon Witness 1pltlµs of aim mbclirsikaMathiss 3527-011 Page 2 of 2 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_000 10052 EFTA00159724

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

EFTA00193068

EFTA00193068 GRAND JURY SUBPOENA LOG In Re: Operation Leap Year Lions No. 2006R01181 FBI Special Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall Ann Marie C. Villafana, AUSA FGJ 05-02 (WPB) Fridays [expiration 2/1/07) Transferred to FGJ 07-103 (WPB) Tuesdays nvestigative No. OLY SUBPOENA CONTROL # SUBPOENAED PARTY RECORDS SOUGHT APPEARANCE DATE ON SUBPOENA ACTUAL RETURN DATE BATES # OR EXHIBIT OLY-01 Colonial Bank Attn: Anita Muller Research Department 1853 Data Drive Hoover, AL 35243 Fax 205 402-8086 Acct. info. re: 1 VISA account and 6 individuals 08/18/2006 02/06/2007 OLY-02 Washington Mutual P.O. Box 9007 Pleasanton, CA 94566 Fax 925 416-5002 Acct. info. re: 1 VISA account and 6 individuals 08/18/2006 02/06/2007 OLY-03 Capital One Subpoena Compliance 15000 Capital One Dr. Richmond, VA 23238 Fax 888 259-3021 Acct. info. re: 1 VISA account and 6 individuals 08/18/2006 OLY-04 Chase Subpoena Compliance 7610 W Washington St Indianapolis, IN 46231 Fa

131p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

FD.302(Ftev.5440

FD.302(Ftev.5440 -1 of 8- FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Date of entry 02/09/2021 LARRY VISOSKI (VISOSKI), was interviewed pursuant to a proffer agreement via video conference with hos attorneys Glen McGorty, Daniel Zelenko and Danielle Giffuni present. Also present via video was Assistant United States Attorneys , Detective and Special Agent . After being advised of the identities of the above listed individuals and the nature of the interview, there was a discussion about the proffer agreement. VISOSKI states that he understands the proffer agreement, signs the document and shows it to the camera. VISOSKI then provides the following information: VISOSKI went to high school in . He then went to community college in Broward County for a year and a half. After that he went to aircraft mechanic trade school in Miami. He learned how to fly while being a mechanic. VISOSKI worked for JEFFREY EPSTEIN from July of 1991 until 2O19. He currently maintains his planes and h

8p
House OversightFBI ReportNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein Child Sex Trafficking Investigation – FBI Records, Deleted Pages, Non‑Prosecution Deal, High‑Profile Connections

The compiled documents reveal a dense web of FBI case files, internal forms, and communications that reference Jeffrey Epstein’s illegal sexual activities with minors, a secret non‑prosecution agreeme FBI case number 31E‑MM‑108062 repeatedly references ‘Child Locate’ entries and deleted pages (b6, b7 Multiple internal FD‑515 forms list Jeffrey Epstein as a subject (named explicitly on 09/30/2008 e

181p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT AND REQUEST FOR A HEARING ON APPROPRIATE REMEDIES COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for a finding from this Court that the victims' rights under the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, have been violated by the U.S. Attorney's Office, and to request a hearing on the appropriate remedies for these violations. The victims have proffered a series of facts to the Government, which they have failed to contest. Proceeding on the basis of these facts,' it is clear that the U.S. Attorney's Office has repeatedly violated the victims' protected CVRA rights, including their right to confer with prosecutors generally about the case and specifically abou

41p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

EFTA00178386

EFTA00178386 United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TO: SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY BEFORE GRAND JURY FGJ 07-103(WPB)-Fti./No. OLY-80/z SUBPOENA FOR: PERSON X DOCUMENTS OR OBJECTISI YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to appear and testify before the Grand Jury of the United States District Court at the place, date and time specified below. PLACE: United States District Courthouse 701 Clematis Street West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 ROOM: Grand Jury Room DATE AND TIME: April 15, 2008 1:00pm YOU ARE ALSO COMMANDED to bring with you the following documents) or object(s): ANY AND ALL NOTES, LETTERS, CARDS, GIFTS, PAYMENTS, AND PHOTOGRAPHS YOU HAVE RECEIVED FROM JEFFREY EPSTEIN, LESLEY GROFF, AND/OR OR ANY EMPLOYEE OF JEFFREY EPST IMI L. ANY AND ALL PHOTOGRAPHS, WHETHER PRINTED OR DIGITAL, OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN, LESLEY GROFF, AND/OR ANY AND ALL E-MAILS, INSTANT MESSAGES, CHATS, TEXT MESSAGES, VOICEMAILS, OR TELEPHONE MESSAGES THAT YOU HAVE SENT TO AND/ORRECEIVED FR

310p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Attorney Bradley Edwards alleges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, 5th Amendment tactics, and a unique George Rush tape as key evidence ...

The affidavit details a non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Epstein from federal charges, claims that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment to block discovery, and describes a purportedly Epstein secured a federal non‑prosecution agreement that barred criminal charges for ~30 victims in All co‑defendants and Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, leaving plaintiffs with no substantive

23p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.