Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00165497DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: FD-71

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00165497
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: To: Subject: FD-71 Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 02:18:40 +0000 I mportance: Normal Rgr, thanks. Assistant Director in Charge FBI New York Office (office) On Au 2019 22:04, "MM I=MM> wrote: all. Will jump on it 1st thing. Believe that the paper file would have been TRIM'd, so FD-71 should have been scanned. The paper copy should also be in Winchester. I say "should" because if the actual file was among those destroyed by Sandy, then obviously we are SOL on getting content. Either way, it should have been indexed, so there should be a record that there was an FD-71 with a complainant's name and info, etc., but that is of course assuming someone actually did index it and it got properly filed. More to follow tomorrow. On Aug 27, 2019 9:23 PM, ' " wrote: C20 was working on this today so I am not sure who they spoke with. I know they did not make much headway on the issue so any assistance would be appreciated. Best Regards, Special Agent in Charge Criminal Division

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Subject: FD-71 Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 02:18:40 +0000 I mportance: Normal Rgr, thanks. Assistant Director in Charge FBI New York Office (office) On Au 2019 22:04, "MM I=MM> wrote: all. Will jump on it 1st thing. Believe that the paper file would have been TRIM'd, so FD-71 should have been scanned. The paper copy should also be in Winchester. I say "should" because if the actual file was among those destroyed by Sandy, then obviously we are SOL on getting content. Either way, it should have been indexed, so there should be a record that there was an FD-71 with a complainant's name and info, etc., but that is of course assuming someone actually did index it and it got properly filed. More to follow tomorrow. On Aug 27, 2019 9:23 PM, ' " wrote: C20 was working on this today so I am not sure who they spoke with. I know they did not make much headway on the issue so any assistance would be appreciated. Best Regards, Special Agent in Charge Criminal Division FBI New York Office i fr On Au 27, 2019 9:18 pm, •• INMIll ia> wrote: here is the info from the update. Not sure if folks have already coordinated with= folks: On 08/26/2019, the New York Times published an article titled "The Sisters Who First Tried to Take Down Jeffreikain." The article references contact with the FBI in 1996. FBI NY determined did contact the FBI in 1996 and an FD-71 was drafted. As this document is not maintained electronically, FBI NY is making efforts to obtain the FD-71 from closed files. FBI NY will thereafter attempt to interview the family. EFTA00165497

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.