FD-302 (Rev. 5-8-10)
Summary
FD-302 (Rev. 5-8-10) -1 of 2 - FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Dmeofentry 07/17/2019 A search warrant, issued in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on 07/11/2019 at 12:50 pm, was executed at 9 East 71st Steet, New York, New York 10021 at 2:35pm on 07/11/2019. The warrant signed by the Honorable Henry Pittman authorized agents to search for certain evidence, fruits, and instrumentalities of violations of sex trafficking of minors and sex trafficking conspiracy described as evidence including computer devices and storage media that may contain any electronically stored information. The search was supervised by SSA and Lt. and included the following participants: SA SA SA SA SA SA SA SA , SA IIMMIL, O Det. SA SA SA SOS SOS ir SOS and FBI Photographer At approximately 2:35pm, agents along with NYPD officers approached the door to the residence and observed the door open and a repair man working on fixing the front door.
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Government, - against - JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. • • x ~'/1WI/1e P— 1- t 13 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILEaft 19 CR. 490 (RMB) DECISION & ORDER REMANDING DEFENDANT A. Background This ruling follows the Court's bail hearing held on July IS, 2019. The issue before the Court is whether the Defendant should continue to be remanded (incarcerated) pending trial or whether he should be granted release while the case proceeds. No matter the answer to this question and no matter what has been said in Court in analyzing the matter. this is a criminal case and the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. is innocent of the Federal charges alleged against him now and until such time, if it comes, that a jury or the Court finds (after fair and thorough consideration of the facts and the law) that he is guilty. 5sg Transcript. dated
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Government, - against - JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. • • x ~'/1WI/1e P— 1- t 13 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILEaft 19 CR. 490 (RMB) DECISION & ORDER REMANDING DEFENDANT A. Background This ruling follows the Court's bail hearing held on July IS, 2019. The issue before the Court is whether the Defendant should continue to be remanded (incarcerated) pending trial or whether he should be granted release while the case proceeds. No matter the answer to this question and no matter what has been said in Court in analyzing the matter. this is a criminal case and the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. is innocent of the Federal charges alleged against him now and until such time, if it comes, that a jury or the Court finds (after fair and thorough consideration of the facts and the law) that he is guilty. 5sg Transcript. dated
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Government, - against - JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. • • x ~'/1WI/1e P— 1- t 13 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILEaft 19 CR. 490 (RMB) DECISION & ORDER REMANDING DEFENDANT A. Background This ruling follows the Court's bail hearing held on July IS, 2019. The issue before the Court is whether the Defendant should continue to be remanded (incarcerated) pending trial or whether he should be granted release while the case proceeds. No matter the answer to this question and no matter what has been said in Court in analyzing the matter. this is a criminal case and the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. is innocent of the Federal charges alleged against him now and until such time, if it comes, that a jury or the Court finds (after fair and thorough consideration of the facts and the law) that he is guilty. 5sg Transcript. dated
FD-302 (Rev. 5-8-10)
FD-302 (Rev. 5-8-10) -1 of 2 - FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Date of entry 07/17/2019 A search warrant, issued in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on 07/11/2019 at 12:50 pm, was executed at 9 East 71st Steet, New York, New York 10021 at 2:35pm on 07/11/2019. The warrant signed by the Honorable Henry Pittman authorized agents to search for certain evidence, fruits, and instrumentalities of violations of sex trafficking of minors and sex trafficking conspiracy described as evidence including computer devices and storage media that may contain any electronically stored information. The search was supervised by SSA and Lt. and included the following participants: SA SA SA , SA , SA , , SA , SA , SA , SA SA SA , SA , SA , TFO Det. , SOS , SOS , SOS , and FBI Photographer At approximately 2:35pm, agents along with NYPD officers approached the door to the residence and observed the door open and a repair man working o
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32 Filed 19 1 o4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, - against - JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Government, Defendant. —x • x USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 19 CR. 490 (RMB) DECISION & ORDER REMANDING DEFENDANT A. Background This ruling follows the Court's bail hearing held on July IS, 2019. The issue before the Court is whether the Defendant should continue to be remanded (incarcerated) pending trial or whether he should be granted release while the case proceeds. No matter the answer to this question and no matter what has been said in Court in analyzing the matter, this is a criminal case and the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is innocent of the Federal charges alleged against him now and until such time, if it comes, that a jury or the Court finds (after fair and thorough consideration of the facts and the law) that he is guilty. 5ss Transcript, dated July 8, 2019
425 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 3d SERIES
306 425 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 3d SERIES t In short, the issue now before the Court has arisen only because Donziger unjustifi- ably has refused to comply with his discov- ery obligations. Had he done so — i.e., had he produced responsive documents as to which there was no colorable claim of priv- ilege, submitted a privilege log as to re- sponsive documents as to which there was such a colorable claim, and submitted any disputes for judicial resolution - there would be no need to examine his ESI. But he has not. And the Court thus must take appropriate action. His arguments to the contrary are meritless. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the Court has entered the protocol for imaging and forensic examination of Donziger's elec- tronic devices and media. SO ORDERED. the six months between being served with the document requests and the Court's eventual ruling, on October I8, 2018, that Donziger had waived any applicable privi- lege. Third, Donziger disregards the
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.