Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00172842DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: RE: [IN LITIGATION] Jeffrey Epstein FOIA Litigation - 17-cv-3956: Radar Online v. FBI ---

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00172842
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: To: Cc: Subject: RE: [IN LITIGATION] Jeffrey Epstein FOIA Litigation - 17-cv-3956: Radar Online v. FBI --- UNCLASSIFIED/NOUO Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:16:45 +0000 Importance: Normal Classification: UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO TRANSITORY RECORD Hi I= Thanks for reaching out. Because our case is linked to the Miami case and our case is still pending further investigation, any information released could harm our ongoing investigation. Respectively, we'd request that you withhold all material per Exemption b7A. Thanks, SA FBI-New York, C-20 Cell: Desk: From: (FBI) Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 3:53 PM To: Cc: Subject: [IN LITIGATION] Jeffrey Epstein FOIA Litigation - 17-cv-3956: Radar Online v. FBI — UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO Importance: High Classification: UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO TRANSITORY RECORD EFTA00172842 Good afternoon NY C-20, Information Management Division (IMD) has been processing a FOIA litigation on Jeffrey Epstein on a 31-MM- 108062 file. Prior to our August 1"

Persons Referenced (1)

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Cc: Subject: RE: [IN LITIGATION] Jeffrey Epstein FOIA Litigation - 17-cv-3956: Radar Online v. FBI --- UNCLASSIFIED/NOUO Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:16:45 +0000 Importance: Normal Classification: UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO TRANSITORY RECORD Hi I= Thanks for reaching out. Because our case is linked to the Miami case and our case is still pending further investigation, any information released could harm our ongoing investigation. Respectively, we'd request that you withhold all material per Exemption b7A. Thanks, SA FBI-New York, C-20 Cell: Desk: From: (FBI) Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 3:53 PM To: Cc: Subject: [IN LITIGATION] Jeffrey Epstein FOIA Litigation - 17-cv-3956: Radar Online v. FBI — UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO Importance: High Classification: UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO TRANSITORY RECORD EFTA00172842 Good afternoon NY C-20, Information Management Division (IMD) has been processing a FOIA litigation on Jeffrey Epstein on a 31-MM- 108062 file. Prior to our August 1" release, we have been processing the records and making monthly releases (the vast majority of the material was withheld). We have since categorically withheld the material per FOIA Exemptions b7A and b7B (...on records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that the production of such law enforcement records or information (b7A) could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings, (b7B) would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication). Before moving forward, we would like you to weigh in on: 2. Is there any harm into your investigation with continuing to process and make releases from the 31-MM- 108062 file? 3. Would the release of any additional material from 31-MM-108062 reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings; therefore, we would categorically withhold all material per Exemption b7A. Please feel free to email or call for any questions, Thanks, Government Information Specialist LSU/RIDS/IMD — FBI Confidentiality Statement: This message is transmitted to you by the Information Management Division, Litigation Support Unit, of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The message, along with any attachments, may be confidential and legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please destroy it promptly without further retention or dissemination (unless otherwise required by law). Please notify the sender of the error by a separate e-mail or by calling (540) 868-1696. Classification: UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO Classification: UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO EFTA00172843

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.