Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00174368DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject:

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00174368
Pages
5
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: To: Cc: Subject: FOR OES PROCESSING- FW: Letter for AG Bondi • from law professor Date: Tuesday, March 4, 2025 12:50:09 PM Attachments: j otter to Bondi re Fnclein %Vim names - FINAI POE - 2-2R-75 nelf Greetings OES, Hope all is well. The attached was sent to OJP/OVC to forward to the appropriate individual handling the Jeffry Epstein case - see email thread below. Pls be advised that OVC cannot act on this request. Regards, From: Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2025 12:43 PM To: 0JP Executive Secretariat Subject: FW: Letter for AG Bondi - from law professor Good afternoon OJP Executive Secretariat, We are sharing the attached letter we received via AskOVC because the Attorney General is the intended recipient and, as such, OVC cannot take action on the request. Thanks! From: Paul Cassell < Sent: Sunday, March 2, 2025 12:01 PM To: askovc < > Subject: RE: law professor trying to send a crime-victims-rights' related email to Attorney General Bondi - can help forwa

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Cc: Subject: FOR OES PROCESSING- FW: Letter for AG Bondi • from law professor Date: Tuesday, March 4, 2025 12:50:09 PM Attachments: j otter to Bondi re Fnclein %Vim names - FINAI POE - 2-2R-75 nelf Greetings OES, Hope all is well. The attached was sent to OJP/OVC to forward to the appropriate individual handling the Jeffry Epstein case - see email thread below. Pls be advised that OVC cannot act on this request. Regards, From: Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2025 12:43 PM To: 0JP Executive Secretariat Subject: FW: Letter for AG Bondi - from law professor Good afternoon OJP Executive Secretariat, We are sharing the attached letter we received via AskOVC because the Attorney General is the intended recipient and, as such, OVC cannot take action on the request. Thanks! From: Paul Cassell < Sent: Sunday, March 2, 2025 12:01 PM To: askovc < > Subject: RE: law professor trying to send a crime-victims-rights' related email to Attorney General Bondi - can help forward the letter? Dear OVC, I'm trying to get the attached letter to Attorney General Bondi rapidly. I haven't been able to locate an email address that works for the Attorney General. I was hoping that you could assist me by forwarding the letter along to the appropriate person working on the Jeffrey Epstein case in the Attorney General's Office. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Paul Cassell for multiple Jeffrey Epstein victims EFTA00174368 Paul G. Cassell (he/him/his) Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law and University Distinguished Professor of Law Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah You can access my publications on htto://ssm.com/author=3016Q CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Any views expressed in this email are solely those of Professor Cassell. EFTA00174369 tli S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW , THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH The Honorable Pam Bondi Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20530 Via email: PAUL G. CASSELL Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law and University Distinguished Professor of Law Quinney College of Law University of Utah (institutional address for identification purposes only and not to imply institutional endorsement) February 28, 2025 Re: URGENT - Preventing the Release of the Names and Identifying Information of Jeffrey Epstein's Sexual Assault Victims Dear Attorney General Bondi: We write on behalf of our clients, multiple sexual assault victims of notorious sex abuser and trafficker, Jeffrey Epstein. We have seen media reports indicating that the Justice Department has (quite properly in our view) released to the public various Epstein files—including media reports showing release of "The Epstein Files: Phase 1." We write to raise with you a concern that many documents and other materials in the various phases of this important transparency project will undoubtedly contain names and other identifying information of Epstein's sexual assault victims. We would like to work with you to ensure that those documents are properly redacted to avoid the devastating harm that would be caused if any of Epstein's victims' names were to be inadvertently released. By way of introduction, all three of us specialize in crime victims' rights, one of us (Cassell) as a law professor working in this field and two of us (Edwards and Henderson) as the founding partners of the Crime Victim Law Firm. Collectively, we have represented over two hundred Epstein victims over the last sixteen years. For example, working together, we were lead counsel in the federal Crime Victims' Rights Act case, which sought to invalidate Epstein's secret non- prosecution agreement as well as to obtain the release of information so that the victims would know what happened. See generally Paul G. Cassell, Bradley J. Edwards, & Jordan Peck, Circumventing the Crime Victims' Rights Act: A Critical Analysis of the Eleventh Circuit's Decision Upholding Jeffrey Epstein's Secret Non-Prosecution Agreement, 2021 MICH. Sr. L. REV. 211; BRADLEY J. EDWARDS WITH BRITTANY HENDERSON, RELENTLESS PURSUIT: MY FIGHT FOR THE VICTIMS OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN (2020). So we strongly support your goal of getting information out about the Epstein case. EFTA00174370 But at the same time, we know that Jeffrey Epstein was sexually abusing young women on a daily basis for years and that, consequently, the names and other identifying information of his hundreds of victims will be scattered throughout various investigative files. Without knowing the details about all the victims and their abuse, certain names and other identifying information could be released inadvertently, which would have devastating consequences. We know that you have been diligently pressing the FBI to provide to provide you with "the full and complete Epstein files," including "all records, documents, audio and video recordings, and materials related to Jeffrey Epstein and his clients, regardless of how such information was obtained." Letter from Attorney General Pam Bondi to FBI Director Kash Patel (Feb. 27, 2025). Consistent with your long-standing attention to crime victims' needs, we also note that your letter to Director Patel has, quite properly, required that the Justice Department "will ensure that any public disclosure of these files will be done in a manner to protect the privacy of victims and in accordance with law, as I done with my entire career as a prosecutor." Id. Of course, one of the laws that operates in federal cases such as this one is the Crime Victims' Rights Act, which requires the Justice Department to treat crime victims—such as the Jeffrey Epstein sexual assault victims-with "fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(8). Against this backdrop, we write to offer our assistance in what will no doubt be an extensive and complex redaction process as the various phases of releasing these documents move forward. In our experience of representing Epstein victims for more than sixteen years, there are likely hundreds of thousands of pages of documents associated with the Epstein investigation. Scattered throughout those pages will be the names (and home addresses, medical information, family members, and other sensitive materials) regarding dozens and dozens of Epstein victims. Ensuring that the redactions of victims' names and other identifying information are done properly and completely will, no doubt, be a complicated task. Because we have considerable experience with the case—and knowledge of more than 200 hundred victims' names and other identifying information—we believe our assistance in this process will be vital to avoid inadvertent release of private information. If the redaction process is done by people without full knowledge of the details of the case, it is likely that victims' names or identifying information will mistakenly be made public. Such unintended releases could have devastating effects on the victims. As you know from your long work prosecuting and supporting the prosecution of sexual abusers, sexual assault victims look to law enforcement to protect them and their privacy. It is vital that redactions of Epstein's victims' names and related information be handled carefully and thoroughly. We offer our assistance to help in the process of releasing the Epstein files, not to hinder it. And because of our expertise and knowledge about the case, we believe that we could help the process move more quickly. Media reports indicate that the Department will be releasing Epstein information in the very near future. If errors were made in that process, it would allow critics of the Department's 2 EFTA00174371 laudable efforts to focus on those mistakes, rather than on the strong public interest in transparency. If we could work with you, we could help prevent mistakes—and help get information to the public rapidly. Of course, the public does not want to compromise victim privacy. A redaction process done by knowledgeable persons is critical to success here. We hope that we can discuss this important crime victims' rights issue with you or your representative as soon as possible. Your commitment to protecting crime victims is well known. We can help. Sincerely, Paul G. Cassell Bradley J. Edwards Brittany Henderson Counsel for many Jeffrey Epstein sexual assault victims cc: Edward Martin, Acting U.S. Attorney, District of the District of Columbia via email at Hayden O'Byme, Acting U.S. Attorney. Southern District of Florida via email at 3 EFTA00174372

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 212-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 23

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 212-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 23 PRIVILEGE LOQ Bates Range Description Privilege(s) Asserted Box #1 P-000001 thru P-000039 Box #1 P-000040 thru P-000549 File folder entitled "CORR RE GJ SUBPOENAS" containing correspondence related to various rand jury subpoenas and attorney handwritten notes 6(e) Work Product Operation Leap Year Grand Jury Log containing subpoenas OLY-01 through OLY-81, correspondence and research related to enforcement of same, documents produced in response to some subpoenas; and attorney ( ) handwritten notes 6(e) Work Product Contains documents subject to investigative privilege Also contains documents subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation Box #1 P-000550 thru P-000621 File folder entitled "Ritz Compact Flash SW" containing copies of a sealed search warrant application, warrant, and supporting documents 6(e) Contains information subjec

23p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 64

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 64 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE No. 1 and JANE DOE No. 2 v. UNITED STATES AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. REGARDING NEED FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 1. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I represent Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 (as referred to as "the victims") in the above-listed action to enforce their rights under the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA). I also represented them (and several other victims) in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I am also familiar with the criminal justice system, having served as state prosecutor in the Broward County State Attorney's Office. 2. This affidavit covers factual issues regarding the Government's assertions of privilege to more tha

64p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Virginia Roberts v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Re: Government's Position on Page Limits

From: To: Cc: Subject: Re: Government's Position on Page Limits Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 01:46:34 +0000 Importance: Normal Paul, You are welcome. The Southern District of Florida Local Rules do not distinguish between civil and criminal proceedings when it comes to the page length of a memorandum of law. S.D.Fla.L.R. 7.1(c)(2) limits a legal memorandum to twenty pages. The government has no objection to petitioners seeking leave to file a legal memorandum exceeding the page limitation by approximately fifteen pages. From: Paul Cassell Sent: Thursda March 17, 2011 08:40 PM To: Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: RE: Government's Position on Page Limits Dear 1. Thank you for the information sent today. 2. What is the Government's position on the page limits applicable to our "summary judgment" pleading — do you believe we are under the civil rules? Or under the criminal rules? Do you believe that we need to file a separate motion for a roughly 35 page pleading with roughly 19 pa

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

In re Wild, 994 F.3d 1244 (2021)

In re Wild, 994 F.3d 1244 (2021) 28 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 2701 994 F.3d 1244 Editor's Note: Additions are indicated by Text and deletions by Text . United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. IN RE: Petitioner. No. 19-13843 (April 15, 2021) Synopsis Background: Alleged victim of child sexual abuse brought civil action against federal government, alleging that government violated Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by failing to confer with alleged victim before entering into non-prosecution agreement with alleged perpetrator. Alleged perpetrator intervened. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM, Kenneth A. Marra, Senior District Judge, 359 F.Supp.3d 1201, determined that government had violated CVRA, but after alleged perpetrator's death, alleged victim's requested remedies were denied and the action was dismissed, ' 41 I F.Supp.3d 1321. Alleged victim petitioned for writ of mandamus. The United States Cou

69p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.