Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00176896DOJ Data Set 9Other

(USAFLS)

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00176896
Pages
3
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

(USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: . (USAFLS) nesc )ternber 17, 2008 12:00 PM Your inquiry regarding the Epstein case (USAFLS): Hi Barry — The Non-Prosecution Agreement contains a confidentiality provision that requires us to inform Mr. Epstein's counsel before making any disclosure — even a compulsory disclosure. I am cc'ing you on a letter to Jay Lcfkowitz, Roy Black, and Jack Goldberger informing them of the request and asking them, as parties to the criminal case, to contact you regarding a possible suit by the Shiny Sheet. On another note, I also will be informing them that I believe that they still have not filed the complete agreement with the Court, as required by the Judge at the hearing. Thank you very much for reaching out to us when you received this request, and if you need any help from us, please let us know. Assistant U.S. Attorne 52 EFTA00176896 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Senior, Robert (USAFLS) er 17, 2008 11:25 AM • Acosta,

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
(USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: . (USAFLS) nesc )ternber 17, 2008 12:00 PM Your inquiry regarding the Epstein case (USAFLS): Hi Barry — The Non-Prosecution Agreement contains a confidentiality provision that requires us to inform Mr. Epstein's counsel before making any disclosure — even a compulsory disclosure. I am cc'ing you on a letter to Jay Lcfkowitz, Roy Black, and Jack Goldberger informing them of the request and asking them, as parties to the criminal case, to contact you regarding a possible suit by the Shiny Sheet. On another note, I also will be informing them that I believe that they still have not filed the complete agreement with the Court, as required by the Judge at the hearing. Thank you very much for reaching out to us when you received this request, and if you need any help from us, please let us know. Assistant U.S. Attorne 52 EFTA00176896 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Senior, Robert (USAFLS) er 17, 2008 11:25 AM • Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); (USAFLS) ate Je (USAFLS) rey Epstein (USAFLS); Lee, Given the non-disclosure agreement, aren't we left with telling the SAO that we have agreed to not disclose so it wouldn't be proper for us to now agree that unsealing is appropriate. Ultimately, it's the SAO's call because they will get the Florida Public Records Act request and they were not a signatory to the agreement. We should also notify defense counsel so that they can take whatever actions they believe are appropriate. Wait till others have had a chance to weigh in on this issue. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, Septem 10:50 AM To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); (USAFLS); Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS); (USAFLS_ Cc: LUSAFLS) Subject: FW: State I. Jeffrey Epstein Will it never end? Barry Krisher sent the e-mail below to Rolando this morning. I low would you like to handle this issue? A. Marie Villafatia Assistant U.S. Attorne From: Sen To: Subject: FW: State (USAFLS) tuber 17, 2008 10:48 AM (USAFLS) Jeffrey Epstein From: Barry Krischer [mallto:Bkrische@sa15.statell.us] Sen • tember 17, 2008 10:46 AM To: LUSAFLS) Subject: FW: State I. Jeffrey Epstein Please advise how you would like us to proceed. The agreement referred to is the Federal Non-Prosecution agreement sealed in the file by the judge at the time of the Epstein plea. From: Lanna Belohiavek Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:21 PM To: Barry Krischer Subject: FW: State'. Jeffrey Epstein 53 EFTA00176897 How to proceed? Lanna From: Bryce Albu (mallto:bryce@reederandreeder.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 3:52 PM To: Lanna Belohlavek Cc: Martin Reeder Subject: State'. Jeffrey Epstein Ms. Belohlavek, We represent The Palm Beach Daily News. The newspaper recently discovered that a non-prosecution agreement (and an addendum thereto) was filed under seal pursuant to an agreed order entered in the above-referenced case. Because the records are sealed, we cannot assess the propriety of the decision to seal them or even whether the newspaper is interested in the information contained therein. I was hoping you would discuss with me the nature of the agreement and the basis for sealing it so that we can advise our client on whether it should pursue an order unsealing the agreement. Please call me at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, C. Bryce Albu Reeder & Reeder P.A. 250 S. Central Blvd., Suite 200 Jupiter, FL 33458 Direct Dial: (561) 575-9721 Facsimile: (561) 575-9765 blyceareederandreedencom 54 EFTA00176898

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Epstein Investigation Files Reveal Potential High‑Level Collusion, Suppressed Evidence, and Questionable Plea Deal

The document contains multiple concrete leads that, if verified, tie a roster of powerful individuals—including Prince Andrew, Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Henry Kissinger, Ted Kennedy, and others—to J Alfredo Rodriguez possessed a bound notebook containing names, addresses, and phone numbers of dozen Rodriguez attempted to sell this notebook to an undercover FBI operative for $50,000, indicating p

63p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 57

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 1 of 57 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-ev-80736-ICAM JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS AND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rule 56.1, move for summary judgment on the issue of the United States Government's violation of their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), where no genuine issue of material fact exists.' In support, they state: INTRODUCTION In 2004, Congress enacted the CVRA because it found that in case after case "victims, and their families, were ignored, cast aside, and treated as non-participants in a critical event in their lives. They were

982p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct

The filing reveals a concrete dispute over sealed court documents that could shed light on why the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and Florida prosecutors allegedly gave Jeffrey Epstein preferent NY Post filed a motion (Dec 21, 2018) to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s SORA appeal, requestin Manhattan DA’s office (Danny Frost, Karen Friedman‑Agnifilo) initially opposed unsealing, citing C

55p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08•cv-80736•KAM Document 190 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2013 Page 1 of 3

Case 9:08•cv-80736•KAM Document 190 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2013 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE NI and JANE DOE #2, petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, respondent. FILED by D.C. JUN 1 8 2013 STEVEN M LARIMORE CLERK U S DIST. CT S 0 of FLA - W PB OMNIBUS ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the court on various motions. Upon consideration, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: I. The petitioners' protective motion seeking recognition of the availability of various remedies attaching to the CVRA violations alleged in this proceeding [DE 128] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renew the request for any particular form of relief or remedy in connection with the court's fmal disposition of petitioners' CVRA petition on the merits. 2. The intervenors' motion to strike the petitioners' supplemental authority regarding privilege claims [DE 177] is DENIED AS MOOT. 3. The petitioners' sealed motion for the co

51p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

.(USAFLS)

.(USAFLS) From: Sent: To: (FBI); . (USAFLS) (FBI) When you have a chance, can you give me the flight info for 8/6/04? Where did it leave from and who was on board. Thanks. Assistant U.S. Attorne 795 EFTA00180159 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Subject: ravel Dates (USAFLS) 00 11' (FBI); (FBI) Hi guys — I am going to re-add the following travel counts: 8/6/04 8/19/04 10/29/04 2/21/05 3/31/05 Does that sound alright? A U Att 796 EFTA00180160 (USAFLS) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: (USAFLS) 27, 0 10:14 AM AFLS) (USAFLS) St avert heard anything How did things go with NM Assistant U.S. Attorne Tracking: 797 EFTA00180161 Recipient ana-/SAILS) IIIMMURAFIS) 798 Read Read: 6/27/2008 10:28 AM Read: 612712008 10:37 AM EFTA00180162 (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: e , 8 12:26 PM To: USAFLS) Subject: : e rey pstein I think that is something we should take up with the State Attorney's Office once this is a done deal. Another way we may be able

133p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01482131

0p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.