HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN PA
Summary
HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN PA ATTORNEYS AT LAW September 16, 2008 Via Fax and Re ular Mail ssis an . . orne 500 Australian Ave., Fourth Floor West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. Jeffrey. m. Herman magai • Fax 305.931.0877 18205 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 www.hormanlaw.com This concerns your letters to us and to sexual assault victims opyfry Epstein dated September 2 2008 Please be advised that we strenuously object to your letters on various'grounds, and believe that they are iti iriolation of the Florida Bar Rules.' First, your letters attempt to steer the victims to a particular attorney, Mr. Josefsberg, and advise them that Mr. Josefsberg will be making an unsolicited contact to them in the next two weeks. This contact with prospective clients and solicitation reflected in your letters is contrary to Fla. Bar. Rule 4-7.4. Additionally, your letters are misleading in the following respects: (1) the action advocated to the vi
Persons Referenced (3)
“...iti iriolation of the Florida Bar Rules.' First, your letters attempt to steer the victims to a particular attorney, Mr. Josefsberg, and advise them that Mr. Josefsberg will be making an unsolicited...”
U.S. Attorney“...ation, irrespective of Mr. Epstein's agreement. We accordingly demand that the U.S. Attorneys' office immediately cease and desist from directing unrepresented victims into unsolicited attorney cont...”
Jeffrey EpsteinTags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Case 9 :08-cv-80119-KAM
Case 9 :08-cv-80119-KAM JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2008 Pan gtotk 6 FILED by VT D.C. ELECTRONIC ebruary 6, 2008 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CLARENCE MADDOX CLERK U.S. Cat CT. S.D. OF HA. • MIAMI CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON COMPLAINT Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2 ("Jane" or "Jane Doe"), brings this Complaint against Jeffrey Epstein, as follows: Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue 1. Jane Doe No. 2 is a citizen and resident of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and is sui juris. 2. This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of the Plaintiff because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse upon a minor. 3. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is a citizen and resident of the State of New York. 4. This is an action for damages in excess of 550 million. 5. This Court has jurisdiction of this action and the clai
PodhurstOrseck
PodhurstOrseck TRIAL & APPELLATE LAWYERS Aaron S. Podhurst Robert C Josefsberg Joel D. Eaton Steven C Marks Victor M. Din, Jr. Katherine W. Ezell Stephen F. Rosenthal Ricardo M. Martfnez-Od Ramona Rasco Alexander T. Rundle' John Gravante, CONFIDENTIAL' Ethics Counsel The Florida Bar 651 East Jefferson Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-2300 September 22, 2008 VIA U.S. MAIL AND VIA E-MAIL Re: Request for Written Staff Opinion Dear Sir or Madam: Robert Orseck (1934-1978) Walter E. Beacham, Jr. Karen Podhurst Dern Of Counsel Attached as Exhibit "A" is a copy of a letter we recently received from Jeffre Hermann. Apparently he sent a similar letter A i tant nited States Attorney Attached as Exhibit "B" is a copy of AUSA letter to you. Her request, and your opinion, will effect how we proceed with this matter. Rather than repeating, or paraphrasing AUSA etter, we are writing to advise you that we agree with her summary of the relevant facts, and we too request you
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 0718/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 2, by and through her undersigned counsel, submits this Memorandum of Law in Response to Motion for Stay, as follows: INTRODUCTION Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay this action is based on the incorrect premise that there are criminal actions pending against him in Palm Beach Circuit Court, State of Florida. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 2006 CF 09454 AXXMB (Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County), and in the Southern District of Florida, In re Grand Jury, No. FGJ 07-103 (WPB) (S.D. Fla.). The Motion to Stay as to the state court criminal action was rendered moot on June 30, 2008 when Jeffrey Epstein entered a plea of guilty to
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2008 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. JANE DOE NO. 3, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. / JANE DOE NO. 4, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. JANE DOE NO. 5, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-KAM-L ---- DC JUL 2 8 2008 STEVEN CLERK M LAD U -EL-r-EyeAgr CASE NO.: 08-80232-CIV- -KAM-L CASE NO.: 08-80380-CIV-KAM-LRJ CASE NO.: 08-80381-CIV-KAM-LRJ FILED UNDER SEAL. EPSTEIN'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STAY This motion is filed under seal because the deferred-prosecution agreement between the United States Attorney's Office and Mr. Epstein. discussed herein, contains a confidentiality clause. A motion to seal has been filed contemporaneously. EFTA00222407 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2008 Page 2 of 13 The Pendine Federal Criminal Action In 2006, a Florida state grand jury indicted Jeffrey Epstei
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2008 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. JANE DOE NO. 3, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. / JANE DOE NO. 4, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. JANE DOE NO. 5, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-KAM-L ---- DC JUL 2 8 2008 STEVEN CLERK M LAD U -EL-r-EyeAgr CASE NO.: 08-80232-CIV- -KAM-L CASE NO.: 08-80380-CIV-KAM-LRJ CASE NO.: 08-80381-CIV-KAM-LRJ FILED UNDER SEAL. EPSTEIN'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STAY This motion is filed under seal because the deferred-prosecution agreement between the United States Attorney's Office and Mr. Epstein. discussed herein, contains a confidentiality clause. A motion to seal has been filed contemporaneously. EFTA00221964 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2008 Page 2 of 13 The Pendine Federal Criminal Action In 2006, a Florida state grand jury indicted Jeffrey Epstei
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2008 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. JANE DOE NO. 3, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. / JANE DOE NO. 4, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. JANE DOE NO. 5, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-KAM-L ---- DC JUL 2 8 2008 STEVEN CLERK M LAD U -EL-r-EyeAgr CASE NO.: 08-80232-CIV- -KAM-L CASE NO.: 08-80380-CIV-KAM-LRJ CASE NO.: 08-80381-CIV-KAM-LRJ FILED UNDER SEAL. EPSTEIN'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STAY This motion is filed under seal because the deferred-prosecution agreement between the United States Attorney's Office and Mr. Epstein. discussed herein, contains a confidentiality clause. A motion to seal has been filed contemporaneously. EFTA00215859 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2008 Page 2 of 13 The Pendine Federal Criminal Action In 2006, a Florida state grand jury indicted Jeffrey Epstei
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.