EFTA00186947

STATEMENT OF

STATEMENT OF IN RESPONSE TO APRIL 2, 2019 LETTER FROM JEFFREY R. RAGSDALE To the extent possible, I have provided all information relevant to your inquiry, including applicable documents. Due to the passage of time, updates to various software and hardware, and the crash of my work laptop several years ago, I no longer have every piece of relevant material and my memory may be imperfect.' I have organized the response to conform with the April 2, 2019 letter from Jeffrey R. Ragsdale to Jonathan Biran. Please note that there were numerous oral and written communications between others at the U.S. Attorney's Office and the Justice Department with counsel for Mr. Epstein. While in some cases I was told of the communications or cc'ed on emails or letters summarizing the communications, for many conversations, meetings, and emails, I do not have knowledge of what occurred. Introduction The investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and I series of co-conspirators, named "Operation Leap

House Oversight Document IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012197

House Oversight Document IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012197 The file contains only a title and no substantive content, providing no leads, names, dates, or allegations to investigate.

EFTA00193068

EFTA00193068 GRAND JURY SUBPOENA LOG In Re: Operation Leap Year Lions No. 2006R01181 FBI Special Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall Ann Marie C. Villafana, AUSA FGJ 05-02 (WPB) Fridays [expiration 2/1/07) Transferred to FGJ 07-103 (WPB) Tuesdays nvestigative No. OLY SUBPOENA CONTROL # SUBPOENAED PARTY RECORDS SOUGHT APPEARANCE DATE ON SUBPOENA ACTUAL RETURN DATE BATES # OR EXHIBIT OLY-01 Colonial Bank Attn: Anita Muller Research Department 1853 Data Drive Hoover, AL 35243 Fax 205 402-8086 Acct. info. re: 1 VISA account and 6 individuals 08/18/2006 02/06/2007 OLY-02 Washington Mutual P.O. Box 9007 Pleasanton, CA 94566 Fax 925 416-5002 Acct. info. re: 1 VISA account and 6 individuals 08/18/2006 02/06/2007 OLY-03 Capital One Subpoena Compliance 15000 Capital One Dr. Richmond, VA 23238 Fax 888 259-3021 Acct. info. re: 1 VISA account and 6 individuals 08/18/2006 OLY-04 Chase Subpoena Compliance 7610 W Washington St Indianapolis, IN 46231 Fa

DS9 Document EFTA00317423

Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures

Bradley Edwards’ Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein’s Summary Judgment Motion – Claims of Abuse of Process, Witness Tampering, and Links to High‑Profile Figures The filing enumerates numerous specific leads that, if verified, tie Jeffrey Epstein to a wide network of powerful individuals (Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Ghislaine Maxwell, etc.) and to alleged obstruction of federal investigations, witness intimidation, and a non‑prosecution agreement. It also references concrete documents (exhibits, deposition excerpts, flight logs, FBI emails) that could be pursued for forensic analysis, discovery requests, or FOIA requests. The combination of high‑profile actors, alleged criminal conduct, and detailed procedural allegations makes this a strong investigative lead. Key insights: Edwards alleges Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment to avoid answering substantive questions, creating adverse inferences.; The motion cites a “Holy Grail” journal allegedly listing underage victims and high‑profile contacts (Trump, Clinton, etc.).; Claims that Epstein’s attorneys (including Alan Dershowitz) may have helped suppress victim testimony and influence the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging child sexual abuse

Epstein deposition excerpt cited in Florida civil case alleging child sexual abuse The passage merely references a prior deposition where Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, offering no new names, transactions, or actionable details beyond what is already public. It confirms existing allegations but provides no novel leads for investigation. Key insights: Cites Epstein's deposition on March 17, 2010; Notes Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about sexual preferences; Mentions adverse inference doctrine in civil procedure