Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00189014DOJ Data Set 9Other

(USAFLS)

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00189014
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

(USAFLS) From: Sent To: Subject (USAFLS) Wednesd June 18, 2008 3:20 PM (USAFLS) RE: Epstein -- Call with Roy Black Nothing that I know of by way of final decision. Subject Epstein -- Call with Roy Black > and I s ke with Ro . Roy said that he had called because he had heard that had discussed the matter with and Roy wanted to see if there was any way to wrap this up before July 7th. Roy also said that he had seen a letter from that said that the matter of incarceration would be left to the State. (1 am not certain what letter he is referring to, but I think wrote a letter about not taking a position on where Epstein would be incarcerated, not the length of time.) So, Roy wondered whether we would go away if Epstein took 60-day deal. explained that had not had substantive discussions with about the case and that all communication regarding the case is being handled by and me. In response to the question of whether there was anything that could "make this go

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
(USAFLS) From: Sent To: Subject (USAFLS) Wednesd June 18, 2008 3:20 PM (USAFLS) RE: Epstein -- Call with Roy Black Nothing that I know of by way of final decision. Subject Epstein -- Call with Roy Black > and I s ke with Ro . Roy said that he had called because he had heard that had discussed the matter with and Roy wanted to see if there was any way to wrap this up before July 7th. Roy also said that he had seen a letter from that said that the matter of incarceration would be left to the State. (1 am not certain what letter he is referring to, but I think wrote a letter about not taking a position on where Epstein would be incarcerated, not the length of time.) So, Roy wondered whether we would go away if Epstein took 60-day deal. explained that had not had substantive discussions with about the case and that all communication regarding the case is being handled by and me. In response to the question of whether there was anything that could "make this go away," we said that our position is that if Epstein stops the process in Washington and leads in accordance with the terms of the signed agreement, then we will perform pursuant to the agreement. explained that if Epstein pleads to something else or gets sentenced to a lower amount, then we will consider that a breach of our agreement and we will proceed accordingly. On that note, has there been any word from Washington? Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorney 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-014976 65 EFTA00189014

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01659959

0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01657328

2p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02662396

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS FGJ 07-103(WPB) DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 UNITED STATES' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE OVERSIZED RESPONSE TO MOTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO INTERVENE AND TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS AND CROSS-MOTION TO COMPEL UNDER SEAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS FGJ 07-103(WPB) DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 UNDER SEAL UNITED STATES' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE OVERSIZED RESPONSE TO MOTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO INTERVENE AND TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS AND CROSS-MOTION TO COMPEL The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Motion for Permission to File an Oversized Response, and, in support thereof, states: 1. Movant Jeffrey Epstein, by and through counsel, filed a Motion to Intervene and to Quash two grand jury subpoenas duces tecum on July

2p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Rol Slack lir „kite'

Rol Slack lir „kite' 2/949 Arcrwite a." 2434 7 Antai, Liu) 3 cut, , 4,/e EFTA00183732 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AfilL/ArtO PART/H.3We; ' Cntercup Cantor 163 East 53'd Street New York, New York 10022-4611 WNW rwerA.COM September 2, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE (56D 820-8777 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re:Jeffrey Bpstein Dear • Facsimile: In response to your letter dated August 26, 2008, I am confirming that Mr. Goldberger should continue to be listed as the contact pawn in the' mended victim notification letters and should receive the carbon copies of thoso letters as they are sent. • Also, we plan on speaking to Mr. Josofsberg this week to discuss a procedure for paying his fees. We intend to comply fully with the agreement and Mr. Epstein will pay Mr. Josfsberg's usual and customary hourly rates for his work pursuant to the agreement facilitating settlements unde

136p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.