Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00194958DOJ Data Set 9Other

ATTACHMENT TO PETITE POLICY WAIVER REQUEST

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00194958
Pages
2
Persons
4
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

ATTACHMENT TO PETITE POLICY WAIVER REQUEST RE JEFFREY EPSTEIN Continuation of Description of Acts Resulting in Prior Prosecution: Epstein delayed his guilty plea and sentencing for nine months, while he tried to renegotiate the terms of the Agreement. Finally, on June 30, 2008, Epstein pled to the state charges and was sentenced to the 18 months. Rather than serve his sentence in the state prison system, he was sentenced to the Palm Beach County Stockade, a low-security "camp" in West Palm Beach. Epstein also was placed on "work release" within three months of starting his sentence. Under the "work release" program, Epstein is picked up by his chauffeur every morning and transported to his attorney's office in West Palm Beach, where he stays all day. According to news reports, the Palm Beach Sheriffs Office spokesperson states that Epstein is allowed out on "work release" from 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. every day of the week. Epstein also earns additional "gain time" for "worki

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
ATTACHMENT TO PETITE POLICY WAIVER REQUEST RE JEFFREY EPSTEIN Continuation of Description of Acts Resulting in Prior Prosecution: Epstein delayed his guilty plea and sentencing for nine months, while he tried to renegotiate the terms of the Agreement. Finally, on June 30, 2008, Epstein pled to the state charges and was sentenced to the 18 months. Rather than serve his sentence in the state prison system, he was sentenced to the Palm Beach County Stockade, a low-security "camp" in West Palm Beach. Epstein also was placed on "work release" within three months of starting his sentence. Under the "work release" program, Epstein is picked up by his chauffeur every morning and transported to his attorney's office in West Palm Beach, where he stays all day. According to news reports, the Palm Beach Sheriffs Office spokesperson states that Epstein is allowed out on "work release" from 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. every day of the week. Epstein also earns additional "gain time" for "working" while in jail, so he is expected to be released from his term of imprisonment on June 24, 2009 — serving less than one year. Epstein also has fought the payment of restitution to the named victims of the federal offenses. The federal district judge presiding over all of the civil suits filed by the victims has ordered the U.S. Attorney's Office to appear in court on Friday, June 12, 2009 to address the issue of whether Epstein has breached his agreement with the U.S. Attorney's Office by opposing the payment of damages to the victims. After a careful review of Epstein's pleadings in those cases, the Office has determined that Epstein is in breach. Notification of that breach will be delivered to Epstein at the hearing. On Tuesday, June 16, 2009, the U.S. Attorney's Office would like to present an indictment charging Epstein and three of his assistants with violations of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371, 1591(a), 1591(b), 2422(b), 2423(b), and 24 e). The proposed indictment contains charges and overt acts related to 19 victims, including M. The federal charges do not overlap with the state charges and the federal indictment will charge Epstein's co-conspirators, not just Epstein. As explained below, the federal sentence for these offenses will likely be approximately 15 years' imprisonment, with a mandatory minimum sentence of five years' imprisonment, followed by lifetime supervised release. The inclusion of M. in the indictment will not have an effect on Epstein's guideline sentence (under the Guidelines, Epstein's advisory range will remain the same if he is convicted for violations related to 5 girls or more). M. is, however, an intricate part of the proof against Epstein and, importantly, against his assistants, who were not prosecuted at all by the State Attorney's Office. At this time, it is anticipated that we may seek a superseding indictment, depending on possible cooperation by one or more of Epstein's assistants and based upon the victims who were identified but not positively confirmed. It is possible that II. will be added to the superseding indictment. Again, the addition of E. will not affect Epstein's advisory guideline range, but including her would help to explain how Epstein's crimes were brought to the attention of law enforcement. In light of the extremely lenient sentence that Epstein received, Epstein's refusal to compensate his victims for their injuries, and the fact that Epstein's co-conspirators have received EFTA00194958 no punishment for their criminal activity, I respectfully request that OEO determine that the Petite policy does not apply to the prosecution of Epstein and his co-conspirators or that waiver of the policy is appropriate under these circumstances. Continuation of Discussion of Federal Interest: Although all of the victims who will be mentioned in the current indictment resided in the Southern District of Florida at the time of the offenses, victims from other Districts throughout the United States have been identified and it is anticipated that some will be part of a superseding indictment. From the investigation, several victims reported Epstein's constant demand for "new" and "fresh faces," leading to the enticement of more and more victims. The state prosecution resulted in a very lenient sentence based on only two victims, despite the State Attorney's knowledge of the existence of many more, and Epstein has received preferential treatment while serving that sentence. The federal investigation resulted in the identification of an even larger number—more than 30 confirmed, which also warrants federal prosecution. Finally, Epstein's co-conspirators have received no criminal punishment whatsoever, and the federal victims have received no restitution for the damages that they have suffered. EFTA00194959

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Motto Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 July 28, 2020 VIA ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Southern District of New York United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: The Government respectfully submits this letter with respect to the protective order to be entered in the above-captioned case, and to respond to the defendant's letter and submission of July 27, 2020 (the "Defendant Letter" or "Def. Ltr.") (Dkt. 29). The Government and defense counsel have conferred regarding a protective order several times via telephone and email between July 9, 2020, and today, including as recently as this morning. The Government and defense counsel have come to an agreement on much of the proposed protective order. However, the parties

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S 120 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. x THE GOVERNMENT'S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - EFTA00039421 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 BACKGROUND 2 ARGUMENT 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell 17 C. The Defendant

239p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. I. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I have represented Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I have also represented other girls who were sexually abused by Epstein. As a result of that representation, I have become familiar with many aspects of the criminal investigation against Epstein and have reviewed discovery and correspondence connected with the criminal investigation. I have also spoken to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 at length about the criminal investigation and their involvement in it, as well enforcement (or lack their of) of their rights as crime victims in the investigation. I also represent Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in the pen

12p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject:

From: To: Subject: - u is airs ews ne Ing e nes ay, u y 29, 2020 Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 10:25:50 +0000 c Importan e: Normal Mobile version and searchable archives available at fbi.bulletinintelligence.com. 1B1 News Briefing TO: THE DIRECTOR AND SENIOR STAFF DATE: WEDNESDAY, JULY 29, 2020 6:30 AM EDT TODAY'S TABLE OF CONTENTS LEADING THE NEWS • Barr Spars With Democrats At Contentious House Hearing. • Barr Says Democrats Have Tried To "Discredit" Him. • Barr Says Bash Investigating "High Number Of Unmaskings" During Obama Administration. PROTESTS • Memo Reveals Federal Agents Sought Role In Suppressing Protests Since Start. • New Mexico Governor Addresses Concerns About Federal Agents In Albuquerque. • Report: US, Oregon In Talks About Pulling Agents From Portland. • Portland Fines Federal Government For Unpermitted Fence Outside Courthouse. • US Park Police Head: Decision To Clear Protesters Not Linked To Trump "Photo Op." • Hundreds Of Cases Involving LAPD Off

47p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Rol Slack lir „kite'

Rol Slack lir „kite' 2/949 Arcrwite a." 2434 7 Antai, Liu) 3 cut, , 4,/e EFTA00183732 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AfilL/ArtO PART/H.3We; ' Cntercup Cantor 163 East 53'd Street New York, New York 10022-4611 WNW rwerA.COM September 2, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE (56D 820-8777 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re:Jeffrey Bpstein Dear • Facsimile: In response to your letter dated August 26, 2008, I am confirming that Mr. Goldberger should continue to be listed as the contact pawn in the' mended victim notification letters and should receive the carbon copies of thoso letters as they are sent. • Also, we plan on speaking to Mr. Josofsberg this week to discuss a procedure for paying his fees. We intend to comply fully with the agreement and Mr. Epstein will pay Mr. Josfsberg's usual and customary hourly rates for his work pursuant to the agreement facilitating settlements unde

136p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.