Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00201298DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00201298
Pages
91
Persons
5
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 1 of 91 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRNJOHNSON C.M.A., Plaintiff(s), vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendant(s). FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue COMES NOW the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and brings this First Amended Complaint against the Defendants, JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, and states as follows: 1. This is an action for damages in excess of $75,000.00, exclusive of interest and costs. 2. This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name in order to protect the identity of the Plaintiff, C.M.A., because this Complaint makes allegation of sexual assault and child abuse of a then minor. 3. At all times material to this cause of action, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. EFTA00201298 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 2 of 91 C.M.A. vs.

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 1 of 91 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRNJOHNSON C.M.A., Plaintiff(s), vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendant(s). FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue COMES NOW the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and brings this First Amended Complaint against the Defendants, JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, and states as follows: 1. This is an action for damages in excess of $75,000.00, exclusive of interest and costs. 2. This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name in order to protect the identity of the Plaintiff, C.M.A., because this Complaint makes allegation of sexual assault and child abuse of a then minor. 3. At all times material to this cause of action, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. EFTA00201298 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 2 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 4. At all times material to this cause of action, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, had a residence located in Palm Beach County, Florida. 5. At all times material to this cause of action, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, was an adult male, born in 1953. 6. This Court has jurisdiction of this action and the claim set forth herein pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255. 7. This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391(a) as a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this district. 8. At all times material, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, owed a duty unto Plaintiff, C.M.A., to treat her in a non-negligent manner and to not commit intentional or tortious illegal acts against her. Factual Allegations 9. Upon information and belief, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, has demonstrated a sexual preference and obsession for minor girls. He engaged in a plan, scheme, and enterprise in which he gained access to economically disadvantaged minor girls, such as Plaintiff, C.M.A., sexually assaulted these girls, and/or coerced them to engage in prostitution, and in return gave these girls money. 10. The Defendant's plan, scheme and enterprise included an elaborate system wherein the then minor Plaintiff and other minor girls were brought to the 2 EFTA00201299 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 3 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, residence by the Defendant's employees and assistants. When the employees and assistants left the then minor Plaintiff and other minor girls alone in a room at the Defendant's mansion, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, himself would appear, remove his clothing, and He would then perform one or more lewd, lascivious, and sexual acts, including, but not limited to, touching of the then minor Plaintiff's and solicitation and enticement of the then minor Plaintiff to engage in MEIMII MMII in JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S presence. 11. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was the first brought to the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, mansion in late May or early June of 2002, when she was fifteen-years old and in middle school. 12. The Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, a wealthy financier with a lavish home, significant wealth, a network of assistants and employees, used his resources and his influence over a vulnerable minor child to engage in a systematic pattern of sexually exploitive behavior. 13. Beginning in approximately late May or early June of 2002, and continuing until approximately August of 2003, the Defendant coerced and enticed the impressionable, vulnerable, and economically deprived then minor Plaintiff to commit various acts of sexual misconduct. These acts occurred, on average, one to three times per week from late May or early June of 2002 until August of 2003. At a bare minimum, 3 EFTA00201300 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 4 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint these acts occurred twice a month from June 2002 until August of 2003. While the precise dates these acts occurred are unknown to Plaintiff, including those weeks in which no acts occurred, these dates are known by Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, as he is reported to have kept a written log of each and every instance in which he engaged in these illegal acts with the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A. and others. These acts included, but were not limited to, fondling and inappropriate and illegal sexual touching of the then minor Plaintiff, sexual misconduct and of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, in the presence of the then minor Plaintiff, he then minor Plaintiff to n JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S presence, and encouraging the then minor Plaintiff to become involved in prostitution; Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, committed numerous criminal sexual offenses against the then minor Plaintiff including, but not limited to, sexual battery, solicitation of prostitution, procurement of a minor for the purpose of prostitution, and lewd and lascivious assaults upon the person of the then minor Plaintiff. 14. Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, used his money, wealth and power to unduly and improperly manipulate and influence the then minor Plaintiff. 15. The acts referenced in paragraphs 9 through 14, committed by Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, against the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A., were committed in violation of numerous criminal State and Federal statutes condemning the sexual 4 EFTA00201301 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 5 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint exploitation of minor children, prostitution, sexual performance by a child, lewd and lascivious assaults, sexual battery, contributing the delinquency of a minor and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated in 18 USC §2241, §2242, §2243, §2421, and §2423, criminal offenses outlined in Chapter 800 of the Federal Codes, as well as those designated in Florida Statutes §796.03, §796.07, §796.045, §796.04, §39.01; and §827.04. 16. The above-described acts took place in Palm Beach County, Florida, at the residence of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. Any assertions by the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, that he was unaware of the age of the then minor Plaintiff are belied by his actions and rendered irrelevant by the provisions of applicable Florida Statutes concerning the sexual exploitation and abuse of a minor child. The Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, at all times material to this cause of action, knew and should have known of the Plaintiff, C.M.A.'s minority. 17. In June 2008, in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, entered pleas of "guilty" to various Florida state crimes involving the solicitation of minors for prostitution and the procurement of minors for the purpose of prostitution. 18. As a condition of that plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for numerous federal offenses, Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the 5 EFTA00201302 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 6 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less". 19. The Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is thus estopped by his plea and agreement with the Federal Government from denying the acts alleged in this Complaint, and must effectively admit liability to the Plaintiff, C.M.A. COUNT I Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC 42255 May/June 2002 20. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 6 EFTA00201303 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 7 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRNJOHNSON First Amended Complaint 21. In late May or early June of 2002, C.M.A. was first introduced to Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN. C.M.A. was brought to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S residence by a female friend of hers. C.M.A. sat on the couch while the female friend took off her own clothes, mounted JEFFREY EPSTEIN who was wearing only a towel and lying on a table, and performed a sexual act upon JEFFREY EPSTEIN in the presence of C.M.A. In exchange for her participation as an observer of JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S lewd and lascivious conduct, C.M.A. was paid $300 by JEFFREY EPSTEIN. 22. As a condition of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in 7 EFTA00201304 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 8 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." 23. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and the United States Government. 24. Pursuant to the agreement, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and as such he must effectively admit liability unto the Plaintiff, C.M.A. 25. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A., has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., 8 EFTA00201305 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 9 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARFtA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., demands judgment against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, punitive damages, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT II Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC 42255 June 2002- Incident 2 26. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 27. Approximately one week after the first incident, C.M.A. received a telephone call from JEFFREY EPSTEIN requesting that she return to his residence. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed C.M.A to and Nand to provide him with a massage. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIhimself in C.M.A.'s presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid C.M.A. $300 for this encounter. 9 EFTA00201306 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 10 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 28. As a condition of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." 29. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and the United States Government. 10 EFTA00201307 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 11 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 30. Pursuant to the agreement, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and as such he must effectively admit liability unto the Plaintiff, C.M.A. 31. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A., has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., demands judgment against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, punitive damages, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further 11 EFTA00201308 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 12 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT III Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC ✓12255 July. 2002 — Incident 1 32. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 33. In July of 2002, C.M.A. again returned to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S residence at his request. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed C.M.A to undress to her underwear and to provide him with a massage. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN himself in C.M.A.'s presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid C.M.A. in excess of $200 for this encounter. 34. As a condition of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For 12 EFTA00201309 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 13 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." 35. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and the United States Government. 36. Pursuant to the agreement, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and as such he must effectively admit liability unto the Plaintiff, C.M.A. 37. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A., has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, 13 EFTA00201310 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 14 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., demands judgment against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, punitive damages, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT IV Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC 42255 July 2002 — Incident 2 14 EFTA00201311 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 15 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 38. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 39. For the second time in July of 2002, C.M.A. again returned to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S residence at his request. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed C.M.A to a and to provide him with a massage. Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, of the then minor C.M.A. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN himself in C.M.A.'s presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid C.M.A. in excess of $200 for this encounter. 40. As a condition of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in 15 EFTA00201312 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 16 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." 41. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and the United States Government. 42. Pursuant to the agreement, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and as such he must effectively admit liability unto the Plaintiff, C.M.A. 43. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A., has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., 16 EFTA00201313 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 17 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., demands judgment against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, punitive damages, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT V Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC 42255 August of 2002 — Incident 1 44. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 45. In August of 2002, C.M.A. again returned to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S residence at his request. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed C.M.A to ■ end to provide him with a massage. Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, of the then minor C.M.A. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN himself in C.M.A.'s presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid C.M.A. in excess of $200 for this encounter. 17 EFTA00201314 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 18 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 46. As a condition of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." 47. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and the United States Government. 18 EFTA00201315 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 19 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 48. Pursuant to the agreement, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and as such he must effectively admit liability unto the Plaintiff, C.M.A. 49. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A., has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., demands judgment against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, punitive damages, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further 19 EFTA00201316 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 20 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT VI Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC §2255 August of 2002 — Incident 2 50. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 51. For the second time in August of 2002, C.M.A. again returned to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S residence at his request. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed C.M.A to . Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, of the then minor C.M.A. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN allellina himself in C.M.A.'s presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid C.M.A. in excess of $200 for this encounter. 52. As a condition of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, 20 EFTA00201317 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 21 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." 53. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and the United States Government. 54. Pursuant to the agreement, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and as such he must effectively admit liability unto the Plaintiff, C.M.A. 55. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A., has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and 21 EFTA00201318 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 22 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., demands judgment against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, punitive damages, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT VII Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC §2255 September of 2002 — Incident 1 56. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 22 EFTA00201319 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 23 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-C IV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 57. In September of 2002, C.M.A. again returned to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S residence at his request. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed C.M.A to fully and to provide him with a massage. Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, of the then minor C.M.A. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN himself in C.M.A.'s presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid C.M.A. in excess of $200 for this encounter. 58. As a condition of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." 23 EFTA00201320 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 24 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 59. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and the United States Government. 60. Pursuant to the agreement, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and as such he must effectively admit liability unto the Plaintiff, C.M.A. 61. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A., has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a 24 EFTA00201321 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 25 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., demands judgment against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, punitive damages, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT VIII Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC 42255 September of 2002 — Incident 2 62. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 63. For the second time in September of 2002, C.M.A. again returned to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S residence at his request. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed C.M.A to and to provide him with a massage. Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, of the then minor C.M.A. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN himself in C.M.A.'s presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid C.M.A. in excess of $200 for this encounter. 25 EFTA00201322 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 26 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 64. As a condition of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." 65. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and the United States Government. 26 EFTA00201323 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 27 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 66. Pursuant to the agreement, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and as such he must effectively admit liability unto the Plaintiff, C.M.A. 67. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A., has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., demands judgment against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, punitive damages, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further 27 EFTA00201324 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 28 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRNJOHNSON First Amended Complaint relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT IX Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC 42255 October of 2002 - Incident 1 68. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 69. In October of 2002, C.M.A. again returned to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S residence at his request. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed C.M.A to■ and to provide him with a massage. Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, of the then minor C.M.A. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN MIS himself in C.M.A.'s presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid C.M.A. in excess of $200 for this encounter. 70. As a condition of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, 28 EFTA00201325 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 29 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-C IV-MARRA/JOH NSON First Amended Complaint if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." 71. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and the United States Government. 72. Pursuant to the agreement, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and as such he must effectively admit liability unto the Plaintiff, C.M.A. 73. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A., has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and 29 EFTA00201326 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 30 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., demands judgment against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, punitive damages, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT X Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC §2255 October of 2002 — Incident 2 30 EFTA00201327 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 31 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 74. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 75. For the second time in October of 2002, C.M.A. again returned to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S residence at his request. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed C.M.A to and to provide him with a massage. Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, of the then minor C.M.A. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN himself in C.M.A.'s presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid C.M.A. in excess of $200 for this encounter. 76. As a condition of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in 31 EFTA00201328 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 32 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." 77. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and the United States Government. 78. Pursuant to the agreement, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and as such he must effectively admit liability unto the Plaintiff, C.M.A. 79. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A., has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., 32 EFTA00201329 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 33 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., demands judgment against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, punitive damages, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT XI Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC §2255 November of 2002 — Incident 1 80. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 81. In November of 2002, C.M.A. again returned to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S residence at his request. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed C.M.A tc= and to provide him with a massage. Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, lof the then minor C.M.A. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN himself in C.M.A.'s presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid C.M.A. in excess of $200 for this encounter. 33 EFTA00201330 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 34 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 82. As a condition of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." 83. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and the United States Government. 34 EFTA00201331 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 35 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-C IV-MARRA/JOH NSON First Amended Complaint 84. Pursuant to the agreement, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and as such he must effectively admit liability unto the Plaintiff, C.M.A. 85. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A., has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., demands judgment against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, punitive damages, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further 35 EFTA00201332 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 36 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT XII Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC 42255 November of 2002 — Incident 2 86. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 87. For the second time in November of 2002, C.M.A. again returned to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S residence at his request. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed C.M.A to and to provide him with a massage. Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, of the then minor C.M.A. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN himself in C.M.A.'s presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid C.M.A. in excess of $200 for this encounter. 88. As a condition of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, 36 EFTA00201333 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 37 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." 89. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and the United States Government. 90. Pursuant to the agreement, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and as such he must effectively admit liability unto the Plaintiff, C.M.A. 91. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A., has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and 37 EFTA00201334 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 38 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., demands judgment against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, punitive damages, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT XIII Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC 82255 December of 2002 — Incident 1 92. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 38 EFTA00201335 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 39 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 93. In December of 2002, C.M.A. again returned to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S residence at his request. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed C.M.A and to provide him with a massage. Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, of the then minor C.M.A. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN himself in C.M.A.'s presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid C.M.A. in excess of $200 for this encounter. 94. As a condition of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." 39 EFTA00201336 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 40 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 95. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and the United States Government. 96. Pursuant to the agreement, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and as such he must effectively admit liability unto the Plaintiff, C.M.A. 97. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A., has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a 40 EFTA00201337 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 41 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., demands judgment against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, punitive damages, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT XIV Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC 42255 December of 2002 — Incident 2 98. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 99. For the second time in December of 2002, C.M.A. again returned to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S residence at his request. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed C.M.A to fEIMOM and to provide him with a massage. Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, of the then minor C.M.A. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN himself in C.M.A.'s presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid C.M.A. in excess of $200 for this encounter. 41 EFTA00201338 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 42 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 100. As a condition of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." 101. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and the United States Government. 42 EFTA00201339 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 43 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 102. Pursuant to the agreement, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and as such he must effectively admit liability unto the Plaintiff, C.M.A. 103. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A., has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., demands judgment against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, punitive damages, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further 43 EFTA00201340 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 44 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRNJOHNSON First Amended Complaint relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT XV Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC S2255 January of 2003 — Incident 1 104. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 105. In January of 2003, C.M.A. again returned to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S residence at his request. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed C.M.A ton and to provide him with a massage. Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, MIN )f the-then minor C.M.A. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN I Ilimself in C.M.A.'s presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid C.M.A. in excess of $200 for this encounter. 106. As a condition of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, 44 EFTA00201341 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 45 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." 107. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and the United States Government. 108. Pursuant to the agreement, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and as such he must effectively admit liability unto the Plaintiff, C.M.A. 109. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A., has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and 45 EFTA00201342 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 46 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et at Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., demands judgment against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, punitive damages, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT XVI Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC 42255 January of 2003 — Incident 2 110. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 46 EFTA00201343 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 47 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 111. For the second time in January of 2003, C.M.A. again returned to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S residence at his request. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed C.M.A to and to provide him with a massage. Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and buttocks of the then minor C.M.A. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN himself in C.M.A.'s presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid C.M.A. in excess of $200 for this encounter. 112. As a condition of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." 47 EFTA00201344 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 48 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRNJOHNSON First Amended Complaint 113. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and the United States Government. 114. Pursuant to the agreement, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and as such he must effectively admit liability unto the Plaintiff, C.M.A. 115. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A., has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a 48 EFTA00201345 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 49 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRAJJOHNSON First Amended Complaint loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., demands judgment against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, punitive damages, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT XVII Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC 42255 February of 2003 — Incident 1 116. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 117. In February of 2003, C.M.A. again returned to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S residence at his request. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed C.M.A thinly fl and to provide him with a massage. Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, of the then minor C.M.A. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN !R!! !!!MI himself in C.M.A.'s presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid C.M.A. in excess of $200 for this encounter. 49 EFTA00201346 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 50 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 118. As a condition of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." 119. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and the United States Government. 50 EFTA00201347 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 51 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-C IV-MARRA/JOH NSON First Amended Complaint 120. Pursuant to the agreement, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and as such he must effectively admit liability unto the Plaintiff, C.M.A. 121. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A., has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., demands judgment against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, punitive damages, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further 51 EFTA00201348 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 52 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT XVIII Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC §2255 February of 2003 — Incident 2 122. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 123. For the second time in February of 2003, C.M.A. again returned to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S residence at his request. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed C.M.A to and to provide him with a massage. Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, of the then minor C.M.A. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN himself in C.M.A.'s presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid C.M.A. in excess of $200 for this encounter. 124. As a condition of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, 52 EFTA00201349 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 53 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." 125. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and the United States Government. 126. Pursuant to the agreement, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and as such he must effectively admit liability unto the Plaintiff, C.M.A. 127. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A., has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and 53 EFTA00201350 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM DocuMent 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 54 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., demands judgment against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, punitive damages, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT XIX Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC §2255 March of 2003 — Incident 1 128. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 54 EFTA00201351 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 55 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 129. In March of 2003, C.M.A. again returned to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S residence at his request. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed C.M.A to -and to provide him with a massage. Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, of the then minor C.M.A. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN timself in C.M.A.'s presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid C.M.A. in excess of $200 for this encounter. 130. As a condition of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." 55 EFTA00201352 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 56 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 131. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and the United States Government. 132. Pursuant to the agreement, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and as such he must effectively admit liability unto the Plaintiff, C.M.A. 133. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A., has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a 56 EFTA00201353 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 57 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., demands judgment against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, punitive damages, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT XX Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC 42255 March of 2003 — Incident 2 134. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 135. For the second time in March of 2003, C.M.A. again returned to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S residence at his request. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed C.M.A to wand to provide him with a massage. Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, lin of the then minor C.M.A. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN himself in C.M.A.'s presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid C.M.A. in excess of $200 for this encounter. 57 EFTA00201354 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 58 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 136. As a condition of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." 137. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and the United States Government. 58 EFTA00201355 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 59 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 138. Pursuant to the agreement, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and as such he must effectively admit liability unto the Plaintiff, C.M.A. 139. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A., has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., demands judgment against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, punitive damages, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further 59 EFTA00201356 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 60 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT XXI Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC 82255 April of 2003 - Incident 1 140. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 141. In April of 2003, C.M.A. again returned to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S residence at his request. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed C.M.A to and to provide him with a massage. Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, of the then minor C.M.A. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN himself in C.M.A.'s presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid C.M.A. in excess of $200 for this encounter. 142. As a condition of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Govemment to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, 60 EFTA00201357 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 61 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARFtA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." 143. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, and as such asserts a cause of action against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code and the agreement between the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and the United States Government. 144. Pursuant to the agreement, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against the Plaintiff, C.M.A., and as such he must effectively admit liability unto the Plaintiff, C.M.A. 145. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, being committed against the then minor Plaintiff, C.M.A., has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and 61 EFTA00201358 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 62 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint suffering, emotional distress, psychological trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy and other damages associated with Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, controlling, manipulating and coercing her into a perverse and unconventional way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature and the Plaintiff, C.M.A., will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff, C.M.A., demands judgment against the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, for compensatory damages of at least the minimum amount provided by law, punitive damages, attorney's fees, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT XXII Cause of Action Pursuant to 18 USC 42255 April of 2003 — Incident 2 146. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., adopts and realleges paragraphs 1 through 19 above. 62 EFTA00201359 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 63 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et at Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 147. For the second time in April of 2003, C.M.A. again returned to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S residence at his request. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed C.M.A to and to provide him with a massage. Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, of the then minor C.M.A. At the conclusion of the massage, JEFFREY EPSTEIN himself in C.M.A.'s presence. JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid C.M.A. in excess of $200 for this encounter. 148. As a condition of the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN's criminal plea, and in exchange for the Federal Government not prosecuting the Defendant for numerous federal offenses, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, additionally entered into an agreement with the Federal Government to the following: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining evidentiary burdens if any a Plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less." 63 EFTA00201360 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 64 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON First Amended Complaint 149. The Plaintiff, C.M.A., was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in Title 18, U

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Exhibit F

Exhibit F EFTA00040089 Case 1:10-cv-21586-ASG Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/17/2010 Page 1 of 15 COMPOSITE EXHIBIT A NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT AND ADDENDUM EFTA00040090 Case 1:10-cv-21586-ASG Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/17/2010 Page 2 of 15 IN RE: INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT IT APPEARING that the City of Palm Beach Police Department and the State Attorney's Office for the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (hereinafter, the "State Attorney's Office") have conducted an investigation into the conduct of Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"); IT APPEARING that the State Attorney's Office has charged Epstein by indictment µith solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Florida Statutes Section 796.07; IT APPEARING that the United States Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have conducted their own investigation into Epstein's background and any offenses that may have been commit

16p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 5:04 PM To: Menchel, Matthew (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Lourie, Andrew (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein I just received a call from the FBI telling me that Vanity Fair is sniffing around again. The reporter is a former detective. He told the FBI agent that his sources tell him "the State has been bought off," and asked if our investigation had been sent to "the circular file." Nesbitt responded, "All I can tell you is that we have an open investigation." On another note, I am going to see the grand jury tomorrow and I anticipate a number of questions regarding the status of the indictment. I'm not sure what, if anything, I can tell them. And I did not hear back regarding making changes to the indictment. Can I get some feedback on that? Thank you. A. Marie Villafana Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL

651p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Bee: "Berman Geoffrey (USANYS

From: Cc: Bee: "Berman Geoffrey (USANYS Subject: SDNY News Clips Wednesday, August 14, 2019 Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 21:15:07 +0000 Attachments: 2019 8-14.pdf SDNY News Clips Wednesday, August 14, 2019 EFTA00094360 Contents Public Corruption Epstein General Crimes Sprecher Violent and Organized Crime Walter Civil Division NYCHA Securities and Commodities Fraud Margulies Sharma and Farkas Matters of Interest Obama-era counsel Greg Craig's trial postponed; new jiLD, to be selected Epstein Saga Puts Spotlight on Crime Victim's Rights Act Donziger Faces Criminal Contempt Prosecution Team at Seward & Kissel Jail Where Epstein Died Has Record of Security Blunders 2nd Circuit's Decision Could Embolden Federal Anti-Corruption Prosecutors Public Corruption Epstein Jeffrey Epstein Raped Me When I Was 15 NYT By Jennifer Araoz 8/14/19 The first time I stepped into Jeffrey Epstein's mansion on the Upper East Side in the fall of 2001, I noticed his security cameras.

28p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

SDNY News Clips, Wednesday, August 14, 2019

SDNY News Clips, Wednesday, August 14, 2019 SDNY News Clips Wednesday, August 14, 2019 Contents Public Corruption 2 Epstein 2 General Crimes 14 Sprecher 14 Violent and Organized Crime 20 Walter 20 Civil Division 22 NYCHA 22 Securities and Commodities Fraud 24 Margulies 24 Sharma and Farkas 26 Matters of Interest 28 Obama-era counsel Greg Craig's trial postponed; new jury to be selected 28 Epstein Saga Puts Spotlight on Crime Victim's Rights Act 30 Donziger Faces Criminal Contempt Prosecution Team at Seward & Kissel 34 Jail Where Epstein Died Has Record of Security Blunders 36 2nd Circuit's Decision Could Embolden Federal Anti-Corruption Prosecutors 38 1 EFTA00094388 SDNY News Clips, Wednesday, August 14, 2019 Public Corruption Epstein Jeffrey Epstein Raped Me When I Was 15 NYT By Jennifer Araoz 8/14/19 The first time I stepped into Jeffrey Epstein's mansion on the Upper East Side in the fall of 2001, I noticed his security cameras. They w

38p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 39 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 1 of 91 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff(s), vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendant(s). FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Parties. Jurisdiction and Venue COMES NOW the Plaintiff, and brings this First Amended Complaint against the Defendants, JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, and states as follows: 1. This is an action for damages in excess of $75,000.00, exclusive of interest and costs. 2. This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name in order to protect the identity of the Plaintiff, because this Complaint makes allegation of sexual assault and child abuse of a then minor. 3. At all times material to this cause of action, the Plaintiff, = was a resident of 3505-025 Page I of 9I SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00003349 EFTA00157731 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 39 Entered on F

91p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48

13p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.