Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00204701DOJ Data Set 9Other

Sent: We

From: To: Sent: We sdne sa da Cc: Subject: RE: From: " To: " Subject: RE: Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 18:09:00 +0000 Importance: Normal \(USAFLS\)" •c ) . \(USAFLS\)" •c > \(USAFLS\)" Is the pros memo the same as the earlier version that emailed me? Also you reference Appendix A in your memo but it wasn't attached to my first memo. Thanks, (USAFLS) May 09, 2007 5:36 PM USAFLS) (USAFLS) Hi and and I finalized the forfeiture provisions this afternoon, so here is the indictment with the forfeiture language and another copy of the pros memo. — I will sign the indictment and add it to the packet. Thanks. « File: 070507 Indictment with Forfeiture.wpd » « File: Pros Memo 5-1-07.wpd » Assistant U.S. Attorne From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 5:17 PM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: Pls email me pros memo. Thanks. EFTA00204701

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00204701
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

From: To: Sent: We sdne sa da Cc: Subject: RE: From: " To: " Subject: RE: Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 18:09:00 +0000 Importance: Normal \(USAFLS\)" •c ) . \(USAFLS\)" •c > \(USAFLS\)" Is the pros memo the same as the earlier version that emailed me? Also you reference Appendix A in your memo but it wasn't attached to my first memo. Thanks, (USAFLS) May 09, 2007 5:36 PM USAFLS) (USAFLS) Hi and and I finalized the forfeiture provisions this afternoon, so here is the indictment with the forfeiture language and another copy of the pros memo. — I will sign the indictment and add it to the packet. Thanks. « File: 070507 Indictment with Forfeiture.wpd » « File: Pros Memo 5-1-07.wpd » Assistant U.S. Attorne From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 5:17 PM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: Pls email me pros memo. Thanks. EFTA00204701

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Sent: We sdne sa da Cc: Subject: RE: From: " To: " Subject: RE: Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 18:09:00 +0000 Importance: Normal \(USAFLS\)" •c ) . \(USAFLS\)" •c > \(USAFLS\)" Is the pros memo the same as the earlier version that emailed me? Also you reference Appendix A in your memo but it wasn't attached to my first memo. Thanks, (USAFLS) May 09, 2007 5:36 PM USAFLS) (USAFLS) Hi and and I finalized the forfeiture provisions this afternoon, so here is the indictment with the forfeiture language and another copy of the pros memo. — I will sign the indictment and add it to the packet. Thanks. « File: 070507 Indictment with Forfeiture.wpd » « File: Pros Memo 5-1-07.wpd » Assistant U.S. Attorne From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 5:17 PM To: . (USAFLS) Subject: Pls email me pros memo. Thanks. EFTA00204701

Technical Artifacts (1)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Wire Refreference

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.