Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00204724DOJ Data Set 9Other

(USAFLS)" </O=USA/OU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CNa>

From: (USAFLS)" </O=USA/OU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CNa> To: litiAFLS)" ) 1 (USAFLS)" Cc: ' (USAFLS)" Subject: FW: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 19:10:31 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2007-05-22 letter to AUSA pdf Gentlemen, and I have already met with Lefcourt, which is really the meeting I promised him. I spoke to him last week and he said he had more information they wanted to present. I told him he could make an appointment to come in again if he wanted to and that we would meet with him again, but I did not promise that we would wait to give him a meeting "before" we charged. So, I think he is really ready for the next level rather than a second meeting with me. also mentioned to me at some point that they wanted to make a presentation on the law and I suggested to him that he contact =without telling him exactly what stage of review we were at. I don't know if MI and Lefcourt have crossed wires or not. In any event, I am forwarding this letter to yo

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00204724
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

From: (USAFLS)" </O=USA/OU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CNa> To: litiAFLS)" ) 1 (USAFLS)" Cc: ' (USAFLS)" Subject: FW: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 19:10:31 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2007-05-22 letter to AUSA pdf Gentlemen, and I have already met with Lefcourt, which is really the meeting I promised him. I spoke to him last week and he said he had more information they wanted to present. I told him he could make an appointment to come in again if he wanted to and that we would meet with him again, but I did not promise that we would wait to give him a meeting "before" we charged. So, I think he is really ready for the next level rather than a second meeting with me. also mentioned to me at some point that they wanted to make a presentation on the law and I suggested to him that he contact =without telling him exactly what stage of review we were at. I don't know if MI and Lefcourt have crossed wires or not. In any event, I am forwarding this letter to yo

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: (USAFLS)" </O=USA/OU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CNa> To: litiAFLS)" ) 1 (USAFLS)" Cc: ' (USAFLS)" Subject: FW: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 19:10:31 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: 2007-05-22 letter to AUSA pdf Gentlemen, and I have already met with Lefcourt, which is really the meeting I promised him. I spoke to him last week and he said he had more information they wanted to present. I told him he could make an appointment to come in again if he wanted to and that we would meet with him again, but I did not promise that we would wait to give him a meeting "before" we charged. So, I think he is really ready for the next level rather than a second meeting with me. also mentioned to me at some point that they wanted to make a presentation on the law and I suggested to him that he contact =without telling him exactly what stage of review we were at. I don't know if MI and Lefcourt have crossed wires or not. In any event, I am forwarding this letter to you. I am going to suggest to Lefcourt the same thing that I suggested to M. I assume you would grant his attorneys a chance to make whatever presentation they desire. It would probably be helpful to us in any event to hear their legal arguments in case we have missed something. Whether Alex would be present or grant them another meeting after that is his call. From: Gerald Lefcourt [mailto: Sent: Tuesda Ma 22, 2007 2:05 PM To: USAFLS) Cc: . (USAFLS); Lilly Ann Sanchez Subject: Jeffrey Epstein attached is a letter seeking meetings, as discussed with you, but with others if it is not resolved. Thanks for your attention. Could you email back so that I know you have received this letter? Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C. EFTA00204724

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

IN RE:

IN RE: INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN ADDENDUM TO THE NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT IT APPEARING that the panics seek to clarify certain provisions of page 4, paragraph 7 of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (hereinafter "paragraph 7"), that agreement is modified as fol lows: 7A. The United States has the right to assign to an independent third-party the responsibility fur consulting with and, subject to the good faith approval of Epstein's counsel, selecting the attorney representative for the individuals identified under the Agreement. If the United States elects to assign this responsibility to an independent third-patty, both the United States and Epstein retain the right to make good faith objections to the attorney representative suggested by the independent third-party prior to the final designation of the attorney representative. 7II. The parties will jointly prepare a short written submission to the independent third-party regarding the role of the attorney represen

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: jeffrey epstein <littlestjeff®yahoo.com>

1p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01729176

0p
DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01695623

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014046

0p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.