Skip to main content
Skip to content
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTPage 1
Case File
efta-efta00204935DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "-(USAFLS)"

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00204935
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: "-(USAFLS)" To:"- (USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" Cc: " (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Jane Doe litigation Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 18:03:39 +0000 Importance: Normal a The request for production was served by e-mail on October 3, 2011. Adding 30 days, and three days for mailing, the government's response is due on November 5, which is a Saturday. The due date is Monday, November 7, as you state. Next week is fine for me. Enjoy your trip. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Frida October 28, 2011 1:57 PM To: USAFLS); Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: Jane Doe litigation (USAFLS) I am leaving the office to fly to Boston in about 10 minutes. I had hoped to get you all a preliminary draft of the motion to dismiss, but it is still "in pieces." By my quick calculation, we do not have to respond to the RFP until November 7. Can you confirm that I am not mistaken? If so, that should also be the target date for filing the motion to dismiss. Unless someone would really like to see my still disjointed writings, I

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
View on efta.gov
Browse DOJ EFTA Releases (OCR)EFTA 00204935
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "-(USAFLS)" To: "- (USAFLS)" (USAFLS)" Cc: " (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Jane Doe litigation Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 18:03:39 +0000 Importance: Normal a The request for production was served by e-mail on October 3, 2011. Adding 30 days, and three days for mailing, the government's response is due on November 5, which is a Saturday. The due date is Monday, November 7, as you state. Next week is fine for me. Enjoy your trip. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Frida October 28, 2011 1:57 PM To: USAFLS); Cc: (USAFLS) Subject: Jane Doe litigation (USAFLS) I am leaving the office to fly to Boston in about 10 minutes. I had hoped to get you all a preliminary draft of the motion to dismiss, but it is still "in pieces." By my quick calculation, we do not have to respond to the RFP until November 7. Can you confirm that I am not mistaken? If so, that should also be the target date for filing the motion to dismiss. Unless someone would really like to see my still disjointed writings, I would rather get a somewhat cohesive draft out either late on Monday or, more likely, on Tuesday. Does that work for everyone? • EFTA00204935

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

DonateMore ways to support →
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.