Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00205143DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Paul Cassell <I

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00205143
Pages
2
Persons
5
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: Paul Cassell <I To: :=rUSAFLS" , Brad Edwards Cc: " USAFI gallt >, (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Replies and Responses Due on January 6, 2012 Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:40:56 +0000 Importance: Normal Hey As you know, we're happy to try and be accommodating. We would be glad to consent to additional time, but would ask in exchange for two things: 1. The various delays mean that several motions have now been (or will shortly be) pending for more than 90 days, triggering a 90 day report obligation under the local rules. We would trust you would be willing to file that with Judge Marra. 2. When we finished our telephone call with you some weeks back, Brad and I understood that we would be receiving (a) some initial discovery in the case and (b) a list of additional discovery that we could expect if your motion to dismiss is denied. But we have yet to receive anything at all regarding discovery. We would trust that you will carry through on what we understood you had agreed t

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Paul Cassell <I To: :=rUSAFLS" , Brad Edwards Cc: " USAFI gallt >, (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Replies and Responses Due on January 6, 2012 Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:40:56 +0000 Importance: Normal Hey As you know, we're happy to try and be accommodating. We would be glad to consent to additional time, but would ask in exchange for two things: 1. The various delays mean that several motions have now been (or will shortly be) pending for more than 90 days, triggering a 90 day report obligation under the local rules. We would trust you would be willing to file that with Judge Marra. 2. When we finished our telephone call with you some weeks back, Brad and I understood that we would be receiving (a) some initial discovery in the case and (b) a list of additional discovery that we could expect if your motion to dismiss is denied. But we have yet to receive anything at all regarding discovery. We would trust that you will carry through on what we understood you had agreed to in the telephone call. Again, we are happy to help — but would ask you to help us on these two points. Thanks! Paul Cassell Co-counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you. From: (USAFLS) [mailto: Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 5:24 PM To: Paul Cassell. Brad Edwards Cc: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: Replies and Responses Due on January 6, 2012 Paul and Brad, Happy New Year. I need to ask if you have an objection to the government seeking a second enlargement of time, up to Tuesday, January 24, 2012, to file replies to the victims' two responses to the government's motion to dismiss and motion EFTA00205143 to stay discovery, and responses to the victims' protective motion to compel and protective motion for remedies. is preparing for an evidentiary hearing in a 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion, which is scheduled for January 24, 2012. I am scheduled to go to trial in a tort case sometime during the two week trial period commencing January 17, 2012. I have spent most of the preceding two weeks getting ready for the trial. My colleague with sporadic assistance from and I, will be preparing the responses and replies. Please let me know if you have any objections. Thanks. EFTA00205144

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Fw: Word version of privilege log

Subject: Fw: Word version of privilege log Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 18:49:44 +0000 Importance: Normal I am out of the office for the afternoon. Can you send Paul the log in Word format? Thanks. From: Paul Cassell [mailto:cassellp@law.utah.edu] Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 01:22 PM Subject: RE: Word version of privilege log Would you be willing to extend us a small favor? It would be helpful if we had a Word / Wordperfect version (or native PDF version) of your two privilege logs, so that we can "cut and paste" responses etc. Would you be willing to provide that to us? Thanks in advance for any help you are willing to extend. Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G. Cassell From: Paul Cassell Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 9:03 AM Subject: RE: other victims Please see attached information about the victims' requests for production. If this allows the Government to provide us any more information, please let us know promptly. Thanks for your

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: '

From: ' (USAFLS)" czi To: (USAFL$)" ctl - - Subject: RE: Voluntary Production of Materials?l Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:17:00 +0000 Importance: Normal I will be at courthouse. Please call me on my cell. I have a plea that starts at 2:00. Assistant U.S. Attorne From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, January 11 2012 11:27 AM To: (USAFLS); Subject: RE: Voluntary Production of Materials?I Let's shoot for 1:30. Are you available then, (USAFLS) From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesda January 11, 2012 11:22 AM To: (USAFLS); Subject: RE: Voluntary Production of Materials?' (USAFLS) I have calendar call at 1:00 p.m. I should be back by 1:30. From: (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 11:20 AM To: I. (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Voluntary Production of Materials?' Sorry, first thing in the morning did not work out. Do you want to talk briefly now, or perhaps at 1:30? Alternatively, I can also call in after my doctor's appointment. Given the waits I often encounter th

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Paul Cassell •ci

From: Paul Cassell •ci To: "IN (USAFLS)" ' Cc: , • (USAFLS)" USAFLS)" >, Brad Edwards Subject: RE: Judge Marra's Order Granting the Victims Motion to Compel Discovery Within 30 Days Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:46:56 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: ORDER-omnibus-wrapup.pdf [tried to send this earlier, but it may not have gone out] Dear We haven't seen the sealed order granting the Government's motion for stay either. (Have you?). But, in any event, Judge Marra's order on June 19, 2013 (DE 190) specifically stated that "The petitioners' motion to compel discovery from the Government [DE 130] is GRANTED. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of entry of this order, the Government shall . . . [produce various discovery]." For your convenience, I attach a copy of DE 190 ordering the Government to produce discovery within 30 days. So we are expecting to see you produce the bulk of our discovery on July 19, 2013, as specifically directed in DE 190 which granted our mo

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing,

Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos £t Lehrman, P.L. 'Ovid Pam ftoisl pet WWW.PATITTOJUSTKE.COM 425 North Andrews Avenue • Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 4 00 "ti e 6.‘ tk i r atire CalkAllfle alvdtr aIINNEV rar ,NYTTENNINIP PITNEY 'OWES 02 !F $003 , 50 0 000i3V, wit JAN 2i 2,2!3 .a4P En M ZIP t20-12E 3330 Dexter Lee A. Marie Villafatia 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 EFTA00191396 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, 1. UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT EFTA00191397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. SEALED DOCUMENT MOTION TO SEAL Petitioners Jane Doc No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2, joined by movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4, move to file the attached pleading and supporti

71p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Jackie Perczek <JPerczek®royblack.com>

From: Jackie Perczek <JPerczek®royblack.com> To: Paul Cassell <cassell law.utah.edu> ow mgw att.ent <owlmgvv@att.ent>, "Maria Kelljchian (maria®pathtojustice.com)" <maria@pathtojustice.com> Cc: "Brad Edwards (brad@pathtojustice.com)" <brad@pathtojustice.com>, "Marvin Simeon" <MSimeon@royblack.com> Subject: RE: Epstein's Request for Prospective Intervention -- no conference among the parties Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:43:47 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi Paul, Thanks for reaching out to me. Because it is 5:41 p.m. here in Miami, I am not able to get back to you today but will get back to you tomorrow. Jackie From: Paul Cassell [mallto:cassellp@law.utah.edu] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 5:40 PM To: Jackie Perczek; owlmgw@att.ent; Maria Kelljchian (maria@pathtojustice.com) Cc: Brad Edwards (brad@pathtojustice.com); Marvin Simeon Subject: Epstein's Request for Prospective Intervention -- no conference among the parties Dear Jackie, We read with interest Epstein's recent

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.