Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00206166DOJ Data Set 9Other

MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C.

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00206166
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C. ATTORNEY AT LAW 20 PARK PLAZA, SUITE BM BOSTON. MASSACHUSETTS 02116 (617)n7-37.2 FAX (6 7) J.IS-95.11 NIGHT EMERGENCY: (6l7)901,1472 Sou thern District of Florida 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear July 22, 2011 EMAIL ADDRESSES: owlmetiRmtnel owImps€,MLnei Roy Black forwarded to me your letter to him dated July 21, 2011, from the District Attorney of the County of New York. We thank you for providing notice of the intended disclosure but we do object to any disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agreement and the related list of witness/victims on the basis of the confidentiality provisions of paragraph 13. Absent an enforceable subpoena - which we would have the right to move to quash in the Court from which it was issued - there exists no right or duty to disclose the confidential Non-Prosecution Agreement or the non-public witness/victim list which was referenced in paragraph 7 of the

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C. ATTORNEY AT LAW 20 PARK PLAZA, SUITE BM BOSTON. MASSACHUSETTS 02116 (617)n7-37.2 FAX (6 7) J.IS-95.11 NIGHT EMERGENCY: (6l7)901,1472 Sou thern District of Florida 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear July 22, 2011 EMAIL ADDRESSES: owlmetiRmtnel owImps€,MLnei Roy Black forwarded to me your letter to him dated July 21, 2011, from the District Attorney of the County of New York. We thank you for providing notice of the intended disclosure but we do object to any disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agreement and the related list of witness/victims on the basis of the confidentiality provisions of paragraph 13. Absent an enforceable subpoena - which we would have the right to move to quash in the Court from which it was issued - there exists no right or duty to disclose the confidential Non-Prosecution Agreement or the non-public witness/victim list which was referenced in paragraph 7 of the NPA. Further, given that the witness/victim list was compiled based on the federal grand jury investigation, we object under Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e) to its disclosure absent an appropriate court order. Very truly yours, 4radc fal Martin G. Weinberg cc: Roy Black EFTA00206166

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

12/11/2007 11.37 FAX

12/11/2007 11.37 FAX 002/099 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP ANSI µq Iwo 11 nail... rani , . 777 South Ftepoorno SWAM LOn AWS:14.$4. Caldwria 90017 xnnnum W Stan I u Call Miler Direct ty 171316W-8440 ktlarrOlutklietti cam VIA 17At IMI1.17 30a 5;i0-6444 I lonorable R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4111Stnan Miami, FL 33132 Rc Jeffrey Epstein Dear Alex: (TIS) 680.8400 www luiluse0 corn December I I. 2IHY7 Enct:undo (Pin) 880.8500 As we discussed during our telephone conversations on both Friday and Monday (yesterday), we are submitting Iwo separate letters that address our broad areas of deep concern in this matter: First. the cluster of fundamental policy issues surrounding the use and implementation of 2255. a richly policy-laden but uncharted area of federal law: and second. our profound concerns as to the background and conduct of the investigation. Consistent with our conversations. we

35p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

4. /) 1/

4. /) 1/ , u6.441S54., oj 7t At A 3505-019 Page I of 63 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00003273 EFTA00157655 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP ANO APIIL1AttO l'ARTROSHIPS To al June 19, 2008 Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Office of the Deputy Attorney General Dear Mr. Roth: Facsimile: O. Fis .MM I again want to thank you for this opportunity to explain why we believe that a federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein is unwarranted. I appreciate your having informed us that you already have our May 19 and May 27 communications to the Deputy Attorney General, as well as our prior written submissions to CEOS and to the Southern District of Florida. In light of the significant volume of our prior submissions and to facilitate your review, we have drafted four supplemental submissions that will provide a roadmap for your investigation of this matter. Given the bulk of these documents and their appended supporting attachments, you wil

63p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP SUMMARY OF MISCONDUCT ISSUES IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN The manner in which federal prosecutors have pursued the allegations against Mr. Epstein is highly irregular and warrants full review by the Department. While we repeatedly have raised our concerns regarding misconduct with the United States Attorney's Office in Miami (the "USAO"), not only has it has remained unwilling to address these issues, but Mr. Epstein's defense counsel has been instructed to limit its contact to the very prosecutors who are the subject of this misconduct complaint. For your review, this document summarizes the USAO's conduct in this case. Background 1. In March 2005, the Palm Beach Police Department opened a criminal investigation of Palm Beach resident, Jeffrey E. Epstein. The press has widely reported that Mr. Epstein is a close friend of former President Bill Clinton. 2. In July 2006, after an intensive probe, including interviews of dozens of witnesses, re

11p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C.

MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C. ATTORNEY AT MW 20 PARK PLAZA, SUITE 1000 ROSTON, MASSACUUSEITS 02116 FAX NIGHT EAIERGRNCV: Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Ms. July 22, 2011 Roy Black forwarded to me your letter to him dated July 21, 2011, from the District Attorney of the County of New York. We thank you for providing notice of the intended disclosure but we do object to any disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agreement and the related list of witness/victims on the basis of the confidentiality provisions of paragraph 13. Absent an enforceable subpoena - which we would have the right to move to quash in the Court from which it was issued - there exists no right or duty to disclose the confidential Non-Prosecution Agreement or the non-public witness/victim list which was referenced in paragraph 7 of the NPA. Further, given th

68p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

J7FYEPSC

J7FYEPSC 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Before: x x 19 CR 490 (RMB) Conference New York, N.Y. July 15, 2019 10:05 a.m. HON. RICHARD M. BERMAN, District Judge APPEARANCES GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York BY: Assistant United States Attorneys Martin G. Weinberg, PC Attorney for Defendant Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) Attorneys for Defendant BY: REID WEINGARTEN MARC FERNICH Attorney for Defendant JAMES BROCHIN Attorney for Defendant JOSEPH JAFFE Attorney for Defendant SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00079746 1 2 3 J7FYEPSC APPEARANCES ( Also Present: David Boies Brad Edwards , NYPD 4 , FBI 5 6 U.S. Pretrial Services n} 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTE

74p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 FGJ 07-103(WPB) UNITED STATES' SURREPLY TO REPLIES FILED BY WITNESS WILLIAM RILEY AND INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN RE: MOTION TO OUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS UNDER SEAL EFTA00222972 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 FGJ 07- I 03(WPB) UNDER SEAL UNITED STATES' SURREPLY TO REPLIES FILED BY WITNESS WILLIAM RILEY AND INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN RE: MOTION TO OUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: I. Both the witness and the intervenor assert that Mr. Riley was excused from appearing before the grand jury and that Mr. Riley did not flout the subpoena by failing t

5p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.