Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00206169DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "Barrett, Wayne" <Wayne.Barrett®newsweekdailybeast.com>

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00206169
Pages
1
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: "Barrett, Wayne" <Wayne.Barrett®newsweekdailybeast.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:58:20 +0000 Importance: Normal This is Jacob Albert, research assistant for Wayne Barrett, at Newsweek. I know you've said that you wouldn't comment on our questions, but I wanted to give you the chance to hear what we're asking before declining. If you'd rather speak by phone, on or off record, 1) The nonprosecution deal that you worked out specified that Epstein would do 30 months in jail? What's your understanding of why he did only 13 of the 18mo of his jail sentence, and why was he excused from the carrying out the remainder of his sentence? Who approved the sentence reduction, at state or federal level, and why? 2) Do you have any knowledge of how Jeffrey Epstein was able to preserve personal and corporate tax benefits/exemption in the Virgin Islands, in 2009, which requires residency (183 days) that Epstein was unable to meet, as he was under house arrest during that period? Do you

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Barrett, Wayne" <Wayne.Barrett®newsweekdailybeast.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:58:20 +0000 Importance: Normal This is Jacob Albert, research assistant for Wayne Barrett, at Newsweek. I know you've said that you wouldn't comment on our questions, but I wanted to give you the chance to hear what we're asking before declining. If you'd rather speak by phone, on or off record, 1) The nonprosecution deal that you worked out specified that Epstein would do 30 months in jail? What's your understanding of why he did only 13 of the 18mo of his jail sentence, and why was he excused from the carrying out the remainder of his sentence? Who approved the sentence reduction, at state or federal level, and why? 2) Do you have any knowledge of how Jeffrey Epstein was able to preserve personal and corporate tax benefits/exemption in the Virgin Islands, in 2009, which requires residency (183 days) that Epstein was unable to meet, as he was under house arrest during that period? Do you know whether VI residency requirements for tax benefits/exemptions are waived if you're in prison or under house arrest in another state? If you still have no comment, please let me know; the article running in Newsweek will state that your office wouldn't comment. Thanks, Jacob Albert Research Assitant for Wayne Barrett EFTA00206169

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.