From: "cmecfautosender@flsd.uscourts.gov" <cmecfautosender@flsd.uscourts.gov>
Summary
From: "cmecfautosender@flsd.uscourts.gov" <cmecfautosender@flsd.uscourts.gov> To: "flsd_cmecf notice@flsd.uscourts.gov" <flsd_cmecf notice®flsd.uscourts.gov> Subject: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Doe 1 Epstein Response in Opposition to Motion Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 15:13:09 +0000 Importance: Normal This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the C1VUECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply. U.S. District Court
Persons Referenced (3)
“...position re [175] Plaintiffs MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum Alfredo Rodriguez filed by Jeffrey Epstein. (Pike, Michael) 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Notice has been electronically mailed to:...”
Jeffrey Epstein“... 7/6/2010 Case Name: Doe I. Epstein Case Number: 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Filer: Jeffrey Epstein Document Number:201 Docket Text: RESPONSE in Opposition re [175] Plaintiffs MOTION for Writ of Habeas...”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of 40 EXHIBIT 16 EFTA00081180 Case 9:08-cv-807m091349pept Z91-15 _EriterM ocp WERocisstifolf/E15 Page 2 of roio-< uoc 16q0,3 e 0 EXHIBIT C Epstein vs. Edwards Undisputed Statement of Facts EFTA00081181 Case 9:08-cv-807ailaVs kigsyffigt 28415-c1p6Arger phri N 7NRocieatgfe)10/§815 Page 3 of IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No.: 50 2009 CA 040800XXXKMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY I EDWARDS, individually, Defendants, STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS Defendant Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., offers the following specific facts as the undisputed material facts in this case. Each of the following facts is numbered separately and individually to facilitate Epstein's required compliance with Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c) ("The adverse party shall identify . . . any summary judgment evidence on wh
Attorney Bradley Edwards alleges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, 5th Amendment tactics, and a unique George Rush tape as key evidence ...
The affidavit details a non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Epstein from federal charges, claims that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment to block discovery, and describes a purportedly Epstein secured a federal non‑prosecution agreement that barred criminal charges for ~30 victims in All co‑defendants and Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, leaving plaintiffs with no substantive
EFTA00230786
EFTA00230786 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 S. Australian Ave, Ste 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Facsimile: June 12, 2009 DELIVERY BY HAND Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400 250 Australian Ave S. West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5015 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Goldberger: Pursuant to the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida hereby provides you with notice that the United States Attorney has determined, based on reliable evidence, that Jeffrey Epstein has willfully violated one of the conditions of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. Specifically, on May 26, 2009, Jeffrey Epstein, through his counsel, filed a "Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement," in the matter of Jane Doe No. 101 v. Jay Epstein, Court File No. 09-CV-80591-ICAM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SERVING SECOND AMENDED ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES COMES NOW the Plaintiff, , by and through undersigned counsel, and hereby files this Notice with the Court that Second Amended Answers to Interrogatories propounded by the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, on January 16, 2009, have been furnished to the attorney for the Defendant I HEREBY CERTIFY that a tru copy of th egoing has been furnished by e- mail this 1.-S racof October, 2009 list of counsel. Attorney for PlaIntiff(s) 3505-045 Page I of 17 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00005456 EFTA00157905 vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-86811-CIV-MARFtAkIOHNSON Plaintiffs Second Amended Answers to Defendant's Fkst Interrogatories PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SERVING SECOND AMENDED ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES 3. List all fo
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 147-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/08/2009 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON C.M.A., Plaintiff(s), VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and SARAH KELLEN, Defendant(s). / PLAINTIFF'S INITIAL DISCLOSURE COMES NOW the Plaintiff, C.M.A., by and through her undersigned attorneys, and hereby files her Initial Disclosure in compliance with the Joint Discovery Plan/Scheduling Report dated August 18, 2008, as follows: (A) Name and, if known, the address and telephone number of each individual likely to have discoverable Information that the disclosing party may use to support its claim or defenses, unless solely for impeachment, identifying the subjects of the information: 1. C.M.A. do her attorneys: Jack Scarola, Esq. and Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Tel: (561) 686-6300 Richard W
Extensive court filing outlines alleged Jeffrey Epstein abuse network, non‑prosecution deal, and potential ties to high‑profile figures (Clinton, T...
The document provides a dense compilation of alleged facts, emails, deposition excerpts, and discovery requests that link Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual‑abuse operation to a “pyramid” recruitment scheme, a Epstein allegedly ran a “pyramid” scheme paying underage victims $200‑$300 per recruited girl. A 2007 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with the U.S. Attorney’s Office allegedly shielded Epstein fr Ema
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.