From: Paul Cassell <
Summary
From: Paul Cassell < To: Paul Cassell < >, (USAFLS)" < Cc: Brad Edwards ' Subject: RE: Proposed Pleading to File - fixed a couple of sentences Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:10:21 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: response-order-show-cause-usattyrevision2.docx (USAFLS)" I noticed that I missed a couple of sentences in the pleading I sent to you that made reference to the simultaneously filed declaration of Brad Edwards. This revision fixes those couple of sentences, making reference only to a soon-to-be filed declaration. Paul Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 tip: %WAY. aw.ut pro t es/default.asp?PersonID=578zname=Cassell Paul CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver i
Persons Referenced (5)
“...ponding to the concerns that your Office has raised. Paul Cassell Counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 EFTA00206679 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Pr...”
Jane Doe #2“...oncerns that your Office has raised. Paul Cassell Counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 EFTA00206679 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College ...”
U.S. Attorney“...your stipulation that the passage of time to this point has not prejudiced the U.S. Attorney's Office. I want to continue to remind your office of its obligation to use its "best efforts" to protect...”
Paul CassellTags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Subject: Re: Motion to Compel and S.J. Briefing Schedule
From: To: Cc: Subject: Re: Motion to Compel and S.J. Briefing Schedule Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 20:25:09 +0000 Importance: Normal 6:00pm is fine for me. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 8, 2017, at 15:22, Either is fine. I will be here late. From: Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 3:16 PM To: Subje : : o ion o ompe an S.J. rie ingc e ue wrote: I have a conference call at 5pm. It should be over by 6pm, if not earlier. Can we talk at 6pm or I can email you if my conference call ends earlier? From: Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 2:38 PM To: Subject: RE: Motion to Compel and S.i. Briefing Schedule You can get me on the line once alls in. I will be at my desk -= From Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 2:11 PM To: Cc: Subject: Re: Motion to Compel and S.J. Briefing Schedule I am out of class at 5:15 pm. What number shall I call? EFTA00211070 Sent from my iPhone On Mar 8, 2017, at 11:56, Can we talk later this afternoon? Begin forwarded message: From: Paul Cassell < Da
Subject: FW: OPR inquiry - request for information
From To Subject: FW: OPR inquiry - request for information Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 16:31:22 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: motion-intervene.pdf; sanctions-motion-attached.pdf This is Cassell's response to Bruce Reinhart's motion to intervene. From: Paul rakeoll [- Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 12:23 PM To: Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: RE: OPR inquiry - request for information Dear As you will have seen, Bruce Reinhard has filed a motion to intervene in our Crime Victims' Rights Act case. (Since has not been served, I attach a copy of the pleading to this e-mail). As you will see, Reinhard claims that we have no factual basis for making an assertion that (for example) Reinhard improperly represented in violation of Justice Department regulations. In view of this motion, we are writing to inquire into the current status of the Justice Department's inquiry into Reinhard's conduct. We also believe that the Justice Department has access to information that will support
From: '
From: ' (USAFLS)" To: >, ' (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Motion to Compel and S.J. Briefing Schedule Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 19:38:15 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi I.— You can get me on the line once calls in. I will be at my desk — 41047 A. Vi&faller Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida From: M, (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 2:11 PM To:a (USAFLS) < Cc:a MI I. (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Motion to Compel and Si. Briefing Schedule I am out of class at 5:15 pm. What number shall I call? Sent from my iPhone c On Mar 8, 2017, at 11:56, a, (USAFLS) > wrote: Can we talk later this afternoon? Begin forwarded message: From: Paul Cassell <a> Date: March 8, 2017 at 8:51:03 AM EST To: "Brad Edwards (USAFLS)" Cc: " I. (USAFLS)" '`= > (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Motion to Compel and S.J. Briefing Schedule Dear I'm writing to express some concerns about the Government's recent response to our most recent discovery requests and to request a stipulated bri
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res
Subjec
Fr • < > Subjec :Deliberative t Process ec aratton rom am Justice - equest or wo ee xtension Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:59:47 +0000 Importance: Normal We have no objection, provided we get the following accommodation, which you already anticipated. We would request that your motion for extension of time give us an extension on our reply document, such that our reply would be due 10 days after the main Justice Department declaration that will be coming in two weeks. If you would include such language as well in any proposed order, saving us (and the court) drafting time, that would be very much appreciated. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message
From: Paul Cassell
From: Paul Cassell To: Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: ere o "e tan on t e ropose tatement of Facts? Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 21:24:26 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi Brad and I both agree that we need to get the facts resolved first, then discuss where we go from there. At the same time, we want to get this moving along. Can we set a specific time line for getting the facts resolved — is there a time that works for you and in the near future to have a conference call? Then is there a specific time shortly after Thanksgiving that would workyou're your U.S. Attorney? Paul Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law http://www.law.utah.edu/profiles/default.asp?PersonID=S7&name=Cassell Paul CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.