Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00206812DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: Jeffrey Epstein

Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:11:19 +0000 Importance: Normal I talked to Brad Edwards this morning, and he is going to send over a proposed joint motion for extension of time. I will fill you in on more details when we talk this morning. EFTA00206812

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00206812
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:11:19 +0000 Importance: Normal I talked to Brad Edwards this morning, and he is going to send over a proposed joint motion for extension of time. I will fill you in on more details when we talk this morning. EFTA00206812

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:11:19 +0000 Importance: Normal I talked to Brad Edwards this morning, and he is going to send over a proposed joint motion for extension of time. I will fill you in on more details when we talk this morning. EFTA00206812

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 09-34791-RBR

8p
DOJ Data Set 9Financial RecordUnknown

The Palm Beach Post

2p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01838551

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 35429605 E-Filed 12/11/2015 10:08:04 AM

26p
House OversightUnknown

Alleged Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Shielded Jeffrey Epstein from a 53‑count indictment and kept victims uninformed

Alleged Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Shielded Jeffrey Epstein from a 53‑count indictment and kept victims uninformed The passage cites a specific non‑prosecution agreement that allegedly prevented a 53‑count federal indictment of Jeffrey Epstein and describes victim‑exclusion tactics. It names dates, a federal prosecutor’s draft indictment, and references to legal filings, offering concrete leads for further FOIA or court‑record requests. While the claim is not novel—Epstein’s NPA has been reported—it provides actionable details (Feb 10 2016 filing, Sept 2007 signing, June 30 2008 termination) that could be pursued to verify the agreement’s terms, the officials who negotiated it, and any potential misconduct by DOJ or the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Key insights: A 53‑count indictment prepared by federal prosecutors was never filed due to an NPA.; Victims were allegedly not consulted about the NPA, violating victim‑rights statutes.; The NPA was signed in September 2007 and remained in effect until June 30, 2008.

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01297934

"Darren Indyke" AND allegation OR arrest OR bribe OR convict OR corrupt OR court O... Page 1 of 2 Goggle *Clew IndyMC AND elligetton OR east OR bribe OR convict CR corrupt OR O All News 'arcs I,na9pn Maps Mtn - con /}n' ,y-. 12 resettle :0 2 roorde; Exclusive: New York attorney general seeks information on financier ... vAwr refort.CCWAIrtele2CISC0MtnagnIcinl.:^areynUSKBN0M2D0V2C15DXS Mos . North Korea Cnannes &Kew ror.ed Epstein's Lawyer Darren Indyke to cup*n why Easter(' foun

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.