Subject: Victims Rights Suit
Subject: Victims Rights Suit Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 23:34:05 +0000 Importance: Normal Rather than throw myself over the ledge, I responded to an email from Brad Edwards. As of this particular moment, he has convinced Judge Cassell that the only thing they should file today is the response to the order to show cause. They will cool off tomorrow, get together dates when Judge Cassell can come to the District to meet, and will give us dates on Friday. I know Willy will be up here on Friday before I leave on vacation (since I had to write part of his speech!), anand I can show him the documents that we have in storage here on the Epstein matter and maybe we can do another conference call as a group? EFTA00206888
Summary
Subject: Victims Rights Suit Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 23:34:05 +0000 Importance: Normal Rather than throw myself over the ledge, I responded to an email from Brad Edwards. As of this particular moment, he has convinced Judge Cassell that the only thing they should file today is the response to the order to show cause. They will cool off tomorrow, get together dates when Judge Cassell can come to the District to meet, and will give us dates on Friday. I know Willy will be up here on Friday before I leave on vacation (since I had to write part of his speech!), anand I can show him the documents that we have in storage here on the Epstein matter and maybe we can do another conference call as a group? EFTA00206888
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Ask AI About This Document
Extracted Text (OCR)
Related Documents (6)
Filing # 35429605 E-Filed 12/11/2015 10:08:04 AM
Case 09-34791-RBR
Alleged Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Shielded Jeffrey Epstein from a 53‑count indictment and kept victims uninformed
Alleged Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Shielded Jeffrey Epstein from a 53‑count indictment and kept victims uninformed The passage cites a specific non‑prosecution agreement that allegedly prevented a 53‑count federal indictment of Jeffrey Epstein and describes victim‑exclusion tactics. It names dates, a federal prosecutor’s draft indictment, and references to legal filings, offering concrete leads for further FOIA or court‑record requests. While the claim is not novel—Epstein’s NPA has been reported—it provides actionable details (Feb 10 2016 filing, Sept 2007 signing, June 30 2008 termination) that could be pursued to verify the agreement’s terms, the officials who negotiated it, and any potential misconduct by DOJ or the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Key insights: A 53‑count indictment prepared by federal prosecutors was never filed due to an NPA.; Victims were allegedly not consulted about the NPA, violating victim‑rights statutes.; The NPA was signed in September 2007 and remained in effect until June 30, 2008.
Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated
Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated The passage hints at a possible concealment of evidence in a high‑profile defamation dispute involving Alan Dershowitz, a prominent attorney, and references the infamous Giuffre allegations. While it names well‑known legal figures, it provides no concrete financial transactions, dates, or new factual revelations beyond already public claims, limiting its investigative utility. However, the suggestion that a court record may be sealed to hide potentially damaging testimony offers a moderate lead for further document‑review and freedom‑of‑information requests. Key insights: Dershowitz requests the court to declare portions of Ms. Giuffre’s affidavit confidential.; He publicly denies the allegations on BBC Radio 4, framing them as a coordinated false‑story campaign.; Dershowitz threatens perjury prosecution against accusers and seeks disbarment of opposing counsel.
The Palm Beach Post
EFTA01838551
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.