Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00207374DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Doe

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00207374
Pages
3
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: To: Subject: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Doe Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 21:18:45 +0000 Importance: Normal Epstein Response in Opposition to Motion This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply. U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered by Edwards, Bradley on 5/7/2010 at 5:18 PM EDT and fi

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Subject: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Doe Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 21:18:45 +0000 Importance: Normal Epstein Response in Opposition to Motion This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply. U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered by Edwards, Bradley on 5/7/2010 at 5:18 PM EDT and filed on 5/7/2010 Case Name: Doe I. Epstein Case Number: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Filer: Jane Doe Document Number: 540 Docket Text: RESPONSE in Opposition re [536] MOTION for Protective Order Regarding Deposition of Story Cowles and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Jane Doe. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit I Part 1 of 3, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit I Part 2 of 3, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit I Part 3 of 3, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit ll)(Edwards, Bradley) 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Notice has been electronically mailed to: Adam D. Horowitz Bradley James Edwards Isidro Manuel Garcia is Jack Alan Goldberger j Jack Patrick Hill j Jeffrey Marc Herman jh Katherine Warthen Ezell EFTA00207374 Michael James Pike M Paul G. Cassell cassell Richard Horace Willits Robert C. Josefsberg tj Robert Deweese Critton , Stuart S. Mermelstein [email protected] 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Notice has not been delivered electronically to those listed below and will be provided by other means. For further assistance, please contact our Help Desk at 1-888-318-2260.: Martin G. Weinberg The following document(s) are associated with this transaction: Document description:Main Document Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_1 1105629215 [Date=5/7/2010] [FileNumber=7555681-0] [25a538d8lec9658c1e8b6e173a4011c31c67a6f9cd2aadbd3361ea3a0007f61852db e5ba96e507d968 fae46813ef4158cda26c002de2bf2cbOd 11333 eaed8ac8]] Document description:Exhibit A Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_11: 1105629215 [Date=5/7/2010] [FileNumber=7555681-1] [5961c6885926b5602d2a21f53b4c4e5641d7ca6d061df51604df11773bbe98db3c00 7a52d60ad85d4e36dc152f8829f3a8ace9a314b02195b98fc662e6c31309]] Document description:Exhibit Exhibit I Part 1 of 3 Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_1 1105629215 [Date=5/7/2010] [FileNumber=7555681-2] [51aa7f9bb690695993b232bfeb6646a8f9051b3fdb0c67clef81299e33b8080067cf 73b55f472bd22c704c1a0ab85c7b905fb419593b170ec83403a782ae104]] Document description:Exhibit Exhibit I Part 2 of 3 Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStampil: 1105629215 [Date=5/7/2010] [FileNumber=7555681-3] [4b12202ee51cb141579d12a826594673e724d77d88025daa4c9ab0a7dce740256f3c 57af197446017838727ef5ddaa789ae3afadc55e59bd5badlf2c5f53277d]] Document description:Exhibit Exhibit I Part 3 of 3 Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_11 1105629215 [Date=5/7/2010] [FileNumber=7555681-4] [76cldfec779f59288bb0639fecceb36dbfaee0fcf6d3109c6c325158c84dc70e0fc4 53ea85a16510dac174675e4d160761dcfa4c2a2c0bb85189b3b9af780bb9]] Document description:Exhibit Exhibit H EFTA00207375 Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_11: 1105629215 [Date=5/7/2010] [FileNumber=7555681-5] [0785c3733b51b920e9689fc77cc5cbe88b2e5ac8868e05225129313b85c98d748bd7 a252131031eaaclbfac880c7735cfle11822a08248251cee4f7eb8a4 1 ad85]J EFTA00207376

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "cmecfautosender®flsd.uscourts.gov" <cmecfautosender®flsd.uscourts.gov>

From: "cmecfautosender®flsd.uscourts.gov" <cmecfautosender®flsd.uscourts.gov> To: "flsd_cmecf notice®flsd.uscourts.gov" <flsd_cmecf notice®flsd.uscourts.gov> Subject: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM Doe I Epstein Notice (Other) Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:41:01 +0000 Importance: Normal This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply. U.S. District Court Southern District

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: '

From: ' To:' Subject: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM Doe I. Epstein Notice of Striking Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:13:10 +0000 Importance: Normal This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply. U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered by Ezell, Katherine on 4/15/2010 at 2:13 PM EDT and filed on

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/02/2009 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 7 Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files his Answer to the Second Amended Complaint and states: 1. Without knowledge and deny. 2. As to the allegations in paragraphs 2, Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege bas

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: '

From: ' II < > To:' , Subject: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM Doe I Epstein Motion for Leave to File Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:49:57 +0000 Importance: Normal This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply. U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida Notice of Electronic Filing The following transaction was entered by Pike, Michael on 4/6/2010 at 9:49 AM EDT

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/31/2008 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARR)VJOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. EFTA00221179 Case 9:08-cv-80993-KAM Document 11 Entered on FLSD Docket 10;31/2008 Page 2 of 11 JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08- 80994-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08- 80993-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS Plaintiffs, Jane Does 2-7, by and through undersigned counsel, file this Mem

11p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: "cmecfautosender®flsd.uscourts.gov" <[email protected]>

From: "cmecfautosender®flsd.uscourts.gov" <[email protected]> To: "flsd_cmecf [email protected]" <flsd_cmecf notice®flsd.uscourts.gov> Subject: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80381-KAM Doe No. 5 1 Epstein Motion for Summary Judgment Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 21:21:04 +0000 Importance: Normal This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not apply. U.S. District Court

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.