Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00207455DOJ Data Set 9Other

1. MICHAEL BURMAN. PA"

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00207455
Pages
2
Persons
1
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

1. MICHAEL BURMAN. PA" GREGORY W. COLEMAN. PA ROBERT D. CRITTON. JR.. BERNARD A. LEBEDEKER MARK T. LUTTIER. R.A. MICHAEL J. PIKE MICHAEL L. SCHEVE DEAN T. XENICK DAVID A YAREMA 'FLORIDA 60AftD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER 2ADMIT11O TO PRACTICE IN rum DA AND COLORADO Honorable Edward B. Davis Akerman Senterfitt One SE Third Avenue Floor 28 Miami, FL 33131-1715 BURMAN. CRITTON LUTTIER&COLEMAN. us YOUR TRUSTED ADVOCATES A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP May 25, 2010 ADELQyI J. BENAVENTE PmALEGAVItNESTICATOR JESSICA CADWELL BOBBIE M. MCKENNA ASHUE STOKEN-BARING BETTY STOKES PARALEGALS RJTA H. BUDNYK Of COUNSEL EDWARD M. RICCI Of COUNSEL Sent by email and by U.S. Mail to Judge Davis only Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Judge Davis: We are in receipt of Mr. Josefsberg's letter to you dated May 21, 2010. We confirm that Mr. Epstein settled each and every case brought by the attorney-representative selected by you. We write this response only to advise you that Mr.

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
1. MICHAEL BURMAN. PA" GREGORY W. COLEMAN. PA ROBERT D. CRITTON. JR.. BERNARD A. LEBEDEKER MARK T. LUTTIER. R.A. MICHAEL J. PIKE MICHAEL L. SCHEVE DEAN T. XENICK DAVID A YAREMA 'FLORIDA 60AftD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER 2ADMIT11O TO PRACTICE IN rum DA AND COLORADO Honorable Edward B. Davis Akerman Senterfitt One SE Third Avenue Floor 28 Miami, FL 33131-1715 BURMAN. CRITTON LUTTIER&COLEMAN. us YOUR TRUSTED ADVOCATES A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP May 25, 2010 ADELQyI J. BENAVENTE PmALEGAVItNESTICATOR JESSICA CADWELL BOBBIE M. MCKENNA ASHUE STOKEN-BARING BETTY STOKES PARALEGALS RJTA H. BUDNYK Of COUNSEL EDWARD M. RICCI Of COUNSEL Sent by email and by U.S. Mail to Judge Davis only Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Judge Davis: We are in receipt of Mr. Josefsberg's letter to you dated May 21, 2010. We confirm that Mr. Epstein settled each and every case brought by the attorney-representative selected by you. We write this response only to advise you that Mr. Epstein has never refused to pay reasonable settlement-related fees that are within the scope of the NPA. He has already paid the attorney-representative $526,000. The attorney-representative has not yet presented him with a final invoice for settlement-related work. The incomplete invoices that have been presented seek $2,000,000 in additional fees. Mr. Epstein has been advised by his attorneys that the requested fees include duplicative work, charges that relate to preparation for litigation not settlement (thus outside his NPA-fee obligations) and charges that are unreasonable and that should be reviewed by a Court rather than simply paid without meaningful review. A significant amount of the total fees (over $1,000,000) is for legal work that the invoices document were done by two outside attorneys who are not even attorneys with the Podhurst Orseck, P.A. law firm. Mr. Epstein's disputes the necessity for and redundancy of these charges. We respect Your Honor's selection and regret that the issue of disputed fees has resulted in litigation. Mr. Epstein is committed to paying whatever fees and costs are determined by the 303 BANYAN BOULEVARD • SUITE 400 • WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 PHONE: 561-842-2820 • FAX: 561-844.6929 • MAILOBCLCIAW.COM WW)Ar. BC LC LAW. COM EFTA00207455 May 25, 2010 Page 2 Court to be his obligation, if any, but he is not required to simply write a blank check. I have filed a motion in the case pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 67, to allow him to deposit $2,000,000 in Trust with the Court pending the outcome of the Complaint which confirms his commitment, Cordially yo Rob D. Critton, Jr. RDC/JPL:ab Cc EFTA00207456

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA02016959

0p
DOJ Data Set 8CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA00014068

0p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02414102

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that

reached in this case, and other information in the possession of the victims, it is also possible that other improper relationships exist between Government agents and Epstein. Please provide any documents, correspondence, and other information regarding the possibility of any improper relationship, including: a) involvement in and/or awareness of any aspect of the Government's criminal investigation and/or possible prosecution/non-prosecution of Epstein; b) Attorney liklimenvolvement in and/or awareness of the Government's interest."( witness, subject, or target of the Epstein investigation, including Sarah Ghislaine Maxwell, Nadia Marcinkova, Lesley Groff, Haley Robson, Louella Ruboyo, Larry Morrison, Larry Visoki, David Rogers, William Hammond, and Robert Roxburgh; c) All documents, correspondence, and other information reflecting telephone calls (includin telephone logs and telephone billing statements) made by or received by m Jeffrey Epstein, the Florida Science

1p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02351991

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 435 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/21/2019 Page 1 of 33 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court upon Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (DE 361); the United States's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (DE 408); Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion to Compel Answers (DE 348) and Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2's Motion for Finding Waiver of Work Product and Similar Protections by Government and for Production of Documents (DE 414). The Motions are fully briefed and ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the Motions and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. Background The facts, as culled from affidavits, exhibits, depositions, answers to interrogatories and reasonably inferred, for the purpose of these motions, are as follows: From betw

33p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.