From: "Robert D. Critton Jr." <reritObelelaw.com>

From: "Robert D. Critton Jr." <reritObelelaw.com> In S Usu. cpst in Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:19:09 +0000 Importance: Normal Priority: normal lane-Images: bc1c.gif; bestlawyers.jpg represent mr. Epstein in the civil cases as you know. I left voice messages at ft. I and wpb, as per your message . Epstein was sent a request to produce in fed'' and st ct cases where mr edwards asked for all docs given/sent, includes correspondence, by the feel govt to Epstein or his attys. We objected, the magistrate ruled ag us , took a rule 4 appeal and j marry upheld mag's decision. See de-462 and 572 in 80119. I wanted to make sure you had actual knowledge of this in that the materials must be turned over on wed in fed'' and Thursday in st. ct. in case you /usao desired to assert a position as an intervenor. I think I understand the policy reasons why defense attys and the usao would not want this type of material subject to discovery, but I am merely providing notice to you. Will request a confidentiality provision, but do not know whether mr edwards will agree. If any 7s , please call me, bob LISTED IN Best Lawyers* THE WORLD'S PREMIER GUIDE This e-mail contains legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the individual or entity named within the message. Should the intended recipient forward this message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney/client privilege. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited. If this communications was received in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message. Disclaimer added by CodeTwo Exchange Rules www.codetwo.com EFTA00207586