Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00207676DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: Paul Cassell

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00207676
Pages
1
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: Paul Cassell To: Cc: Subject: Epstein's Position on section 2255 Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:05:01 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: epstein-2255-sj.pdf Hi I wanted to call to your attention this recent filing by Jeffrey Epstein in one of the civil cases against him. As you will see, in part II of his summary judgment motion, he argues that only a victim who is currently a minor (i.e., only one who is under the age of 18 today) can seek civil relief under the federal statute, 18 USC 2255. This position, to put it mildly, seems somewhat at odds with the position that Epstein is expected to take under the non-prosecution agreement. If accepted, it would mean that NONE of the victims listed in the non-prosecution agreement would be able to pursue relief under section 2255. I wanted to call this inconsistency to your attention and request that you enforce Epstein's obligations to his victims under the non-prosecution agreement. Thanks in advance for your help on thi

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: Paul Cassell To: Cc: Subject: Epstein's Position on section 2255 Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:05:01 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: epstein-2255-sj.pdf Hi I wanted to call to your attention this recent filing by Jeffrey Epstein in one of the civil cases against him. As you will see, in part II of his summary judgment motion, he argues that only a victim who is currently a minor (i.e., only one who is under the age of 18 today) can seek civil relief under the federal statute, 18 USC 2255. This position, to put it mildly, seems somewhat at odds with the position that Epstein is expected to take under the non-prosecution agreement. If accepted, it would mean that NONE of the victims listed in the non-prosecution agreement would be able to pursue relief under section 2255. I wanted to call this inconsistency to your attention and request that you enforce Epstein's obligations to his victims under the non-prosecution agreement. Thanks in advance for your help on this issue. Paul Cassell Counsel for] Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah http://www.law.utah.edu/profilesidefault.asp?PersonID=57&name=Cassell Paul CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Thank you. EFTA00207676

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL) - RISHI SUNAK INVESTIGATION!! CASE REF: ZA52784 Re: Rishi Sunak Re: TRUMP SOS Re: Thank you

From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL) - RISHI SUNAK INVESTIGATION!! CASE REF: ZA52784 Re: Rishi Sunak Re: TRUMP SOS Re: Thank you to the Oz Police for confirming ! Emotional Blackmail Re: Sunday School? : Mike Baker and Emily Steel NY Timm Re: Gayle King Re: Naughty Brad and Daniel Bates Re: Theme Tune J1 Song For Funeral Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 17:49:22 +0000 Importance: Normal Inline-Images: IMG_6895.jpeg Hi President Trump, The Securities Exchange and the FCA Please can you investigate Rishi Sunak and his financials including California! Also please can you get everything and all correspondence from Rishi Sunaks office (ie George). The case number is ZA52784 as in the screen shot. Why would Rishi sunak want all his emails deleted if my server? Mmmmmm! Please can you investigate this for me President Trump because this could have all been resolved in 2022!! I've suffered enough!! EFTA00144040 07:49 sic I St S R <® Arrest Sent: 4 Argil 2022 10: To: SUNAK. Rishi S

42p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject:

From: To: Cc: Subject: FOR OES PROCESSING- FW: Letter for AG Bondi • from law professor Date: Tuesday, March 4, 2025 12:50:09 PM Attachments: j otter to Bondi re Fnclein %Vim names - FINAI POE - 2-2R-75 nelf Greetings OES, Hope all is well. The attached was sent to OJP/OVC to forward to the appropriate individual handling the Jeffry Epstein case - see email thread below. Pls be advised that OVC cannot act on this request. Regards, From: Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2025 12:43 PM To: 0JP Executive Secretariat Subject: FW: Letter for AG Bondi - from law professor Good afternoon OJP Executive Secretariat, We are sharing the attached letter we received via AskOVC because the Attorney General is the intended recipient and, as such, OVC cannot take action on the request. Thanks! From: Paul Cassell < Sent: Sunday, March 2, 2025 12:01 PM To: askovc < > Subject: RE: law professor trying to send a crime-victims-rights' related email to Attorney General Bondi - can help forwa

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Westlaw.

Westlaw. Pagel 749 F.3d 999, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1270 (Cite as: 749 F.3d 999) H United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Jane DOE NO. 1, Jane Doe No. 2, Plaintiffs-Appellees, 1. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Roy Black, Martin G. Weinberg, Jeffrey Epstein, Intervenors-Appellants. No. 13-12923. April 18, 2014. Background: Alleged minor victims of federal sex crimes brought action against the United States alleging violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act ( CVRA) re- lated to the United States Attorney Office's execution of non-prosecution agree- ment with alleged perpetrator. After the victims moved for disclosure of corres- pondence concerning the non-prosecution agreement, the alleged perpetrator and his criminal defense attorneys intervened to assert privilege to prevent the disclos- ure of their plea negotiations. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Court, No. 9:08-CV-80736-KAM, ordered disclosure. The inter- v

16p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - KEIR STARMER - HUMAN RIGHTS AND BRITISH

From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] - KEIR STARMER - HUMAN RIGHTS AND BRITISH DEMOCRACY Thu, 03 Apr 2025 09:08:24 #0000 Importance: Normal IMG_6895.Meg; IMG_6923.jpeg KEIR, DON'T YOU THINK ITS TIME THE BRITISH PUBLIC DESERVE TO KNOW THE TRUTH?? JOBS ARE GOING TO BE LOST..... THE BRITISH PUBLIC THAT VOTED YOU IN DESERVE TO KNOW THE TRUTH, OR IS BRITAIN NO LONGER A DEMOCRACY?? IF SO, AT LEAST BE HONEST ABOUT IT!!! THEY NEED TO KNOW ESPECIALLY AFTER IT WAS YOU WHILE PUBLICALLY CALLED DOR PRINCE ANDREW TO BE INVESTIGATED IN THE FIRST PLACE!! lifipaiLvanLiodosmdsolaukam pokialslamiraptoralimirmxspalgimpolire-b/47171611ml KEIR WHO ARE YOU PROTECTING?? REMEBER I RELINQUISHED MY BRITISH CITIZENSHIP BECAUSE OF THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT!! WHO ARE YOU PROTECTING!!! EFTA00144082 11:06* .a 1`. 0—> Post t KeirStarmerO @KeirStarmer There will be an economic impact from the decisions the US has taken. ••• We will continue to negotiate on a deal in our interests. Decisions will b

46p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Virginia Roberts v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation

The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded

87p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.