FD-448
Summary
NAP F.dl FD-448 Reviled 10.27.2004 FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION FACSIMILE COVER SHEET r Routine PRECEDENCE r Immediate r PrturIty CLASSIFICATION r Top Secret r Secret r Confieent itir a Sensitive r Un class fled TO Name of Office: U.S. Attorney's Office - Miami Attn: Maritsa Arbasu Facsimile Number, (305) 536-4101 Date: 03/16/2010 Room: Telephone Number: (305) 961-9339 FROM Name of Office: P8I Miami, Chief Division Counsel Originator's Herne: PLS Deyanks Aponte Approved' PM Number of Pages: (including cover) Originator's Telephone Number: (305) 787-6727 Originators FaCSirrillit Number: (305)787-6124 DETAILS Subject: Jane Does 2-7'. Jeffrey Epstein Special Handling InstrucbOrtg: Please let me know which AUSA will be assigned this matter. Thank you. Brief Description of Communication Fazed: WARNING Information attached to the cover sheet is U.S. Government Property. If you are not the intended recipient of this Information disdosu
Persons Referenced (5)
“...Federal Regulations (CFR), Section 16.21 et seq, and the Privacy Act (Title 5, United States Code, Section 552a). These regulations specify that no employee of the Departm...”
The Witness“...f the United States, or one of its officers or agents, I have also tendered to the witness fees for one days attendance, and the mileage allowed by law, in the amount of...”
U.S. Attorney“... Secret r Confieent itir a Sensitive r Un class fled TO Name of Office: U.S. Attorney's Office - Miami Attn: Maritsa Arbasu Facsimile Number, (305) 536-4101 Date: 03/16/2010 Room: Tele...”
Jeffrey Epstein“...inators FaCSirrillit Number: (305)787-6124 DETAILS Subject: Jane Does 2-7'. Jeffrey Epstein Special Handling InstrucbOrtg: Please let me know which AUSA will be assigned this matter. Thank you. ...”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 344 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/17/2015 Page 1 of 7
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 344 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/17/2015 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08.80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 I UNITED STATES JANE DOE NO. 1 AND JANE DOE NO. 2'S MOTION FOR DEPOSITIONS OF GOVERNMENT WITNESSES COME NOW Jane Doe No. I and Jane Doe No. 2 (the "victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to file this motion for court permission to take the depositions of six important Government witnesses in this action. The witnesses have significant information relevant to the case and the victims should be allowed to depose them. For example, two the witnesses are FBI agents who the Government claims properly informed the victims about Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement. Three of the witnesses are Assistant U.S. Attorney's (AUSA's) who were heavily involved in discussions with defense counsel about victim notifications as well as organizing telephone calls and othe
C.oNtrES%- f ACk
C.oNtrES%- f ACk u-C CrO At PgoPer/ THEFT Of me Di 130s usieS5 Nal -1 rdiSic /NI DZOla flin -nur - 02n17 neTAmt-ifik c Wit urea - cnevary: nOICCICIII21111- t4 i C 11 Aa Peril &AST° H AOC 11 Gm. it froA UOtiN HILL. - toi kit *TER 6F tteAciti Ro6eR Kteamieft • _ . . Enquiry : Intellectual Law "?c To Dear John, I am contacting you today as i have an enquiry in regards to business law and have been advised At. by Heather Mack , Senior Solicitor of Westside Lawyers Port Pirie, to seek further advice and assistance with a lawyer in your fi have been advised by Dino DI Rosa of Di Rosa Lawyers, Adelaide, to contact you in regards to this matter, proud me with your contact details. I haw a matter concerning the SA Medical Association and a proposed business plan that i had written and had contacted the board about in 2009. Heather Mack has ad4sed me that i need the advice of an Intellectual Lawyer in regards to the business plan. I had started research concernin
5/19)22, 3:52 PM
5/19)22, 3:52 PM et Al..3 Ohle:R - CAC ‘,14S-AN Nriehn- 1-yo-nc 4\) Jeffrey EpsteM -1M k ipedia Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, : Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with November 30, 2018. her, and paid her $2OO immediately afterward.[196] • A similar $so-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer.(L.291 These and several similar lawsuits were dismissed. [1.19-] All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court.i1X-1 Epstein made many out-of-court settlements with alleged victims.P:t193 Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014 su Flts0SE Si KC; stim 1 N)Eccri ncs FT' (<) A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe 1 ( and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights ./W-by the U.S. Department of Justice's NPA with E stein and his limited 2008
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2011 Page 1 of 54
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/08/2011 Page 1 of 54 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIME VICTIM RIGHTS ACT AND REQUEST FOR A HEARING ON APPROPRIATE REMEDIES Respondent, United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies, and states: I. INTRODUCTION The issue before this Court is whether the petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, had any rights under 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a), in the absence of a criminal charge being filed in the Southern District of Florida, charging someone with the commission of a federal crime in which petitione
Subject: Re: SDNY News Clips Wednesday, July 31, 2019
From: To: Subject: Re: SDNY News Clips Wednesday, July 31, 2019 Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 23:27:22 +0000 Ha, really? In that case pretty sure I've seen the filing but will take a look. Thanks Sent from my iPhone On Jul 31, 2019, at 7:24 PM, ) < > wrote: That article is a reference to a government filing from over a month ago (Spencer Kuvin seems especially interested in being quotes in belated but inflammatory fashion on these issues) — but in any event, the NDGA filing from then is attached. From: Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 17:14 To: Subject: FW: SDNY News Clips Wednesday, July 31, 2019 It looks like NDGa just filed something in the CVRA litigation — do you have a copy by any chance? From: Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 5:12 PM Cc: Subject: SDNY News Clips Wednesday, July 31, 2019 SDNY News Clips Wednesday, July 31, 2019 Contents Public Corruption. 2 Epstein. 2 Collins. 18 Securities and Commodities Fraud. 20 Stewart 20 Thompson. 22 Pinto-Thomaz. 24 Narco
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. UNITED STATES' OPPOSITION TO JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIME VICTIM RIGHTS ACT AND REQUEST FOR A HEARING ON APPROPRIATE REMEDIES Respondent, United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Opposition to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies, and states: I. INTRODUCTION The issue before this Court is whether the petitioners, Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, had any rights under 18 U.S.C. § 377I(a), in the absence of a criminal charge being filed in the Southern District of Florida, charging someone with the commission of a federal crime in which petitioners were victims. Resolution of this issue is a matter of statutory interpretatio
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.