Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00208437DOJ Data Set 9Other

To: Brad Edwards <[email protected]>

To: Brad Edwards <[email protected]> Subject: FW: jeffrey epstein prosecution Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:15:54 +0000 Importance: Normal FYI From: Aitken, Lee [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 4:07 PM Subject: jeffrey epstein prosecution I am an editor at both Newsweek and the Daily Beast website. I left a phone message last week but have not received a call back. Now we are facing a deadline for posting on the Daily Beast tonight, so I'd like to give you another chance to respond to our query. We have obtained a five-page letter you wrote to attorney Jay Leflcowitz on December 13, 2007 protesting charges of misconduct on your part and laying out several details about your interactions with Jeffrey Epstein's legal team. Your co-signer, Alex Accosta, has already acknowledged the vaiidity of this letter, but I would also like you to confirm that it came from your office. If you have any further comment to make about it or facts to add ab

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00208437
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity

Summary

To: Brad Edwards <[email protected]> Subject: FW: jeffrey epstein prosecution Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:15:54 +0000 Importance: Normal FYI From: Aitken, Lee [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 4:07 PM Subject: jeffrey epstein prosecution I am an editor at both Newsweek and the Daily Beast website. I left a phone message last week but have not received a call back. Now we are facing a deadline for posting on the Daily Beast tonight, so I'd like to give you another chance to respond to our query. We have obtained a five-page letter you wrote to attorney Jay Leflcowitz on December 13, 2007 protesting charges of misconduct on your part and laying out several details about your interactions with Jeffrey Epstein's legal team. Your co-signer, Alex Accosta, has already acknowledged the vaiidity of this letter, but I would also like you to confirm that it came from your office. If you have any further comment to make about it or facts to add ab

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
To: Brad Edwards <[email protected]> Subject: FW: jeffrey epstein prosecution Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:15:54 +0000 Importance: Normal FYI From: Aitken, Lee [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 4:07 PM Subject: jeffrey epstein prosecution I am an editor at both Newsweek and the Daily Beast website. I left a phone message last week but have not received a call back. Now we are facing a deadline for posting on the Daily Beast tonight, so I'd like to give you another chance to respond to our query. We have obtained a five-page letter you wrote to attorney Jay Leflcowitz on December 13, 2007 protesting charges of misconduct on your part and laying out several details about your interactions with Jeffrey Epstein's legal team. Your co-signer, Alex Accosta, has already acknowledged the vaiidity of this letter, but I would also like you to confirm that it came from your office. If you have any further comment to make about it or facts to add about this case I would love to hear back from you right away. We plan to post a story about the negotiations behind the Non-Prosecution agreement at 8 pm this evening. Thank you for your time and prompt attention, Lee Aitken EFTA00208437

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 09-34791-RBR

8p
DOJ Data Set 9Financial RecordUnknown

The Palm Beach Post

2p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01838551

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Filing # 35429605 E-Filed 12/11/2015 10:08:04 AM

26p
House OversightUnknown

Alleged Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Shielded Jeffrey Epstein from a 53‑count indictment and kept victims uninformed

Alleged Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) Shielded Jeffrey Epstein from a 53‑count indictment and kept victims uninformed The passage cites a specific non‑prosecution agreement that allegedly prevented a 53‑count federal indictment of Jeffrey Epstein and describes victim‑exclusion tactics. It names dates, a federal prosecutor’s draft indictment, and references to legal filings, offering concrete leads for further FOIA or court‑record requests. While the claim is not novel—Epstein’s NPA has been reported—it provides actionable details (Feb 10 2016 filing, Sept 2007 signing, June 30 2008 termination) that could be pursued to verify the agreement’s terms, the officials who negotiated it, and any potential misconduct by DOJ or the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Key insights: A 53‑count indictment prepared by federal prosecutors was never filed due to an NPA.; Victims were allegedly not consulted about the NPA, violating victim‑rights statutes.; The NPA was signed in September 2007 and remained in effect until June 30, 2008.

1p
Dept. of JusticeOtherUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01297934

"Darren Indyke" AND allegation OR arrest OR bribe OR convict OR corrupt OR court O... Page 1 of 2 Goggle *Clew IndyMC AND elligetton OR east OR bribe OR convict CR corrupt OR O All News 'arcs I,na9pn Maps Mtn - con /}n' ,y-. 12 resettle :0 2 roorde; Exclusive: New York attorney general seeks information on financier ... vAwr refort.CCWAIrtele2CISC0MtnagnIcinl.:^areynUSKBN0M2D0V2C15DXS Mos . North Korea Cnannes &Kew ror.ed Epstein's Lawyer Darren Indyke to cup*n why Easter(' foun

2p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.