Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00208490DOJ Data Set 9

II. PETITIONERS' FAILURE TO PROSECUTE THEIR CASE PROMPTLY HAS MADE THE

Other

II. PETITIONERS' FAILURE TO PROSECUTE THEIR CASE PROMPTLY HAS MADE THE CASE MOOT. As explained above, at the initial hearing on the Emergency Petition, Petitioners stated that their desired result was the setting aside of the NPA and the prosecution of Epstein. At the second hearing on the matter, counsel stated that they no longer wanted that remedy and stated that they would inform the Court of their desired remedy upon reviewing the full NPA. However, after reviewing the NPA, no such notification was provided, other than filing a motion to unseal the NPA. And, although the most recent motion (DE48) contains no demand for a remedy, the clear suggestion is that Petitioners are seeking to set aside the NPA. [ CITE PRESS COVERAGE RE "STINKS TO HIGH HEAVEN."' Epstein entered his guilty plea to state charges on June 30, 2008. At the time that Petitioners filed the Emergency Petition on July 7, 2008, Epstein had been imprisoned for seven (7) days. At the time of the first hearin

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00208490
Pages
4
Persons
1
Integrity
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.