Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00208787DOJ Data Set 9Other

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013, Order Granting Petitioners' Motion to Require Government to File Redacted Pleadings in the Public Court File, the Respondent hereby gives notice of its filing of the unsealed/redacted versions of filings previously made under seal by the government, as listed in the following table: Appendix Filing Original Docket # Date Filing A 118 11/07/2011 Motion to Seal United States' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction B 119 11/07/2011 United States' Sealed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction C 120 11/07/2011 Motion to Seal Respondent's Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Ruling Upon Respondent's Motion to Dismiss D 121 11/07/2011 Respondent's Sealed Motion to Stay Discovery Pending

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00208787
Pages
3
Persons
5
Integrity

Summary

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013, Order Granting Petitioners' Motion to Require Government to File Redacted Pleadings in the Public Court File, the Respondent hereby gives notice of its filing of the unsealed/redacted versions of filings previously made under seal by the government, as listed in the following table: Appendix Filing Original Docket # Date Filing A 118 11/07/2011 Motion to Seal United States' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction B 119 11/07/2011 United States' Sealed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction C 120 11/07/2011 Motion to Seal Respondent's Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Ruling Upon Respondent's Motion to Dismiss D 121 11/07/2011 Respondent's Sealed Motion to Stay Discovery Pending

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013, Order Granting Petitioners' Motion to Require Government to File Redacted Pleadings in the Public Court File, the Respondent hereby gives notice of its filing of the unsealed/redacted versions of filings previously made under seal by the government, as listed in the following table: Appendix Filing Original Docket # Date Filing A 118 11/07/2011 Motion to Seal United States' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction B 119 11/07/2011 United States' Sealed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction C 120 11/07/2011 Motion to Seal Respondent's Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Ruling Upon Respondent's Motion to Dismiss D 121 11/07/2011 Respondent's Sealed Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Ruling Upon Respondent's Motion to Dismiss E 146 01/26/2012 Motion to Seal United States' Reply in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction F 147 01/26/2012 United States' Reply in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Those filings are contained in the appendix to this notice as indicated in the foregoing table. I EFTA00208787 Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Attorneys for Respondent CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing United States' Notice of Filing was served via CM/ECF on this 5th day of July, 2013, on the parties and counsel appearing on the attached service list. ssistant United States Attorney 2 EFTA00208788 SERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 2 v. United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Brad Edwards, Esq., Roy Black, Esq. Farmer. Jaffe. Weissine. Jackie Perczek, Es . Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah Attorneys for Jane Doe # I and Jane Doe # 2 3 Martin G. Weinberg MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P.C. Jay P. Lefkowitz Kirkland &Ellis, LLP EFTA00208789

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedNov 8, 2019

Epstein Exhibits

Case 18-2868, Document 278, 08/09/2019, 2628230, Page1 of 648 EXHIBIT A Case 18-2868, Document 278, 08/09/2019, 2628230, Page2 of 648 6114:2016 Prince Andrew and girl, 17, who sex o?er?er friend flew to Britain to meet him Daily Mail Ontine Daily ail .com Home I U.K. Sports Showbiz [Australia [Femail [Health [Science [Money [Video [Travel [Columnists tr am .22: ,t Latest wisestii?tr?e Prince Andrew and the 17-year-old girl his 1 sex offender friend flew to Britain to

648p
DOJ Data Set 9Financial RecordUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 312-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2015 Page 1 of 25

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 312-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2015 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION TO JANE DOE NO. 1 AND JANE DOE NO. 2's PROTECTIVE MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 15 TO AMEND THEIR PETITION TO CONFORM TO EXISTING EVIDENCE AND TO ADD JANE DOE NO. 3 AND JANE DOE NO. 4 AS PETITIONERS Respondent United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Opposition to Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2's Motion pursuant to Rule 15 to Amend their Petition to Conform to Existing Evidence and to Add Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4 as Petitioners, and states: I. THE CAREFUL BALANCE THAT CONGRESS STRUCK WITH THE CVRA COUNSELS AGAINST THE EXPANSION OF THESE CVRA PROCEEDINGS TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL CLAIMS OR PARTIES. Petitioners have filed their "protective" motion to amend their petit

25p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S INITIAL DISCLOSURES Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, makes its Initial Disclosures, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(A), and state: Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(A)fil: 1. R. Alexander Acosta Dean, School of Law Florida International University Rafael Diaz-Balart Hall 11200 S.W. 8'h Street Miami, Florida 33199 (305) 348-1118 Dean Acosta was the United States Attorney, Southern District of Florida, during the time when the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein was opened in the U.S. Attorney's Office, and the non-prosecution agreement was negotiated. 2. was the First Assistant U.S. Attorney in the U.S. Attorney's Office, during the time when the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein was opened, and the non-prosecution agreement was negot

10p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USAFLS)

(USAFLS) From: Roy Black < Sent: Wednesda , Februa 11, 2015 8:50 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Your phone call Great. Speak to you then. Original Message From: (USAFLS) Imailt Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 8:49 AM To: Roy Black Subject: Re: Your phone call Hi Roy. Thanks for your message. Dexter wants to participate in the call so it is helpful to have a roadmap of the discussion points. We will call your office at 2:00. If there is a better number to call, just shoot me an email. Talk to you soon. Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 S. Australian Ave, Ste 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 On Feb 10, 2015, at 7:35 PM, "Roy Black" < mailto: wrote: Marie I was not calling you about the correspondence so don't worry about that. I called you to discuss the plaintiff's replies filed as dockets 310 and 311. We think there are serious misstatements by them in these pleadings. So I just wanted to let you know what our suggested responses are.

389p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 312 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2015 Page 1 of 3

3p
DOJ Data Set 9Financial RecordUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 312-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/23/2015 Page 1 of 25

25p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.