Case: 13-12923
Summary
Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 09/23/2013 Page: 1 of 1 IN TIIE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 13-12923-CC JANE DOE. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROY BLACK, MARTIN G. WEINBERG, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, versus Plaintiff - Appellee, Defendant - Appellee, Intervenors - Appellants. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida BEFORE: DUBINA, MARCUS, and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: Appellants' motion to stay the district court's June 18. 2013. order compelling the disclosure of communications between intervenors and federal prosecutors is GRANTED. See Garcia-Miri Meese, 781 F.2d 1450, 1453 (11th Cir. 1986). The Clerk is directed to place this case on the next available oral argument calendar after briefing is completed. EFTA00209302 Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 09/23/2013 Page: 1 of 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING 56 Forsyth Strce
Persons Referenced (4)
“...OR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 13-12923-CC JANE DOE. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROY BLACK, MARTIN G. WEINBERG, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, versus Plaintiff - Appellee, Defendant - Appellee, Intervenors - A...”
Jeffrey Epstein“...2923-CC JANE DOE. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROY BLACK, MARTIN G. WEINBERG, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, versus Plaintiff - Appellee, Defendant - Appellee, Intervenors - Appellants. On Appeal from the Un...”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2012 Page 1 of 23
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/17/2012 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING OF INTERVENORS ROY BLACK, MARTIN WEINBERG, AND JAY LEFKOWITZ IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING PRODUCTION, USE, AND DISCLOSURE OF PLEA NEGOTIATIONS During the hearing on August 12, 2011, the Court directed the proposed intervenors to file additional briefing on their argument that plea negotiations are privileged and not subject to discovery or use as evidence in these proceedings. Proposed intervenors submit the following memorandum of law, which is identical to Parts I and II of the memorandum of law submitted by proposed intervenor Jeffrey Epstein in support of his motion for a protective order and his opposition to the motions of the plaintiffs for production, use,
Subject: RE: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80736-ICAM Doe v. United States of America Endorsed Order
From: To: Subject: RE: Activity in Case 9:08-cv-80736-ICAM Doe v. United States of America Endorsed Order Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:38:56 +0000 Importance: Normal I should be available on April 20, and I think also on April 28, but I'm checking on the later date. That could be when I need to be in Nashville. I should be able to tell you before Monday. U From: Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 12:52 PM To: Subj : : vi in se : -cv- - oe v. ni o menca n o er Hello again — Please see below. I will set up a conference line and send an email to the judge and all attorneys of record. By the way, I called to clarify whether "all counsel of record" meant only counsel for the Jane Does and us, and I was told that the judge wants all intervenors notified, as well. That means: Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, Jay Lefkowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach Post, and Palm Beach Daily News. Judge Marra denied Bruce Reinhart and Alan Dershowitz's motions to intervene. Assistant U.S. Attor
Westlaw.
Westlaw. Pagel 749 F.3d 999, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1270 (Cite as: 749 F.3d 999) H United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Jane DOE NO. 1, Jane Doe No. 2, Plaintiffs-Appellees, 1. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Roy Black, Martin G. Weinberg, Jeffrey Epstein, Intervenors-Appellants. No. 13-12923. April 18, 2014. Background: Alleged minor victims of federal sex crimes brought action against the United States alleging violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act ( CVRA) re- lated to the United States Attorney Office's execution of non-prosecution agree- ment with alleged perpetrator. After the victims moved for disclosure of corres- pondence concerning the non-prosecution agreement, the alleged perpetrator and his criminal defense attorneys intervened to assert privilege to prevent the disclos- ure of their plea negotiations. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Court, No. 9:08-CV-80736-KAM, ordered disclosure. The inter- v
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S INITIAL DISCLOSURES Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, makes its Initial Disclosures, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(A), and state: Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(A)fil: 1. R. Alexander Acosta Dean, School of Law Florida International University Rafael Diaz-Balart Hall 11200 S.W. 8'h Street Miami, Florida 33199 (305) 348-1118 Dean Acosta was the United States Attorney, Southern District of Florida, during the time when the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein was opened in the U.S. Attorney's Office, and the non-prosecution agreement was negotiated. 2. was the First Assistant U.S. Attorney in the U.S. Attorney's Office, during the time when the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein was opened, and the non-prosecution agreement was negot
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 295 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/26/2015 Page 1 of 18
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 295 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/26/2015 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs, 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Defendant. LIMITED INTERVENOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO ORDER REQUESTING JUSTIFICATION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER A few days ago, on January 21, 2015, the plaintiffs' lawyers filed Plaintiffs' Response To Motion For Limited Intervention By Alan M. Dershowitz. [DE 291]. This is a 40-page pleading addressing whether the Court should allow Professor Dershowitz to intervene. At the very end, on page 38, the Plaintiffs quote from a 2007 plea and settlement negotiation letter that Epstein's defense lawyers sent to the government. The quote, in its entirety, is five or six words. The quote is redacted from the public filing but it is obvious that the quoted language is but a few words, not even a complete sentence. The le
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.