From: Martin Weinberg <owlmgw®att.net>
Summary
From: Martin Weinberg <owlmgw®att.net> To: 8 J Cc: "owlmgw®att.net" <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: 13-12923-CC Jane Doe I. Roy Black "Assigned to Tentative Calendar" Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 16:50:03 +0000 mportance: Normal ..._.._ __..._. Latest update: The 11th Circuit has at least preliminarily assigned oral argument for week of 2-24-14. Original Message From: ecf hellaca11.uscourts.gov To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 3:41 PM Subject: 13-12923-CC Jane Doe l Roy Black "Assigned to Tentative Calendar ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first viewing. United States Court of Appeals for t
Persons Referenced (4)
“... J Cc: "owlmgw®att.net" <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: 13-12923-CC Jane Doe I. Roy Black "Assigned to Tentative Calendar" Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 16:50:03 +0000 mportance: Normal ..._.._ __..._. ...”
Martin Weinberg“...From: Martin Weinberg <owlmgw®att.net> To: 8 J Cc: "owlmgw®att.net" <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: 13-12923-CC Jane Doe I. Roy Black "Assigned to Tentative Calendar" Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 16:50...”
Paul Cassell“...eek of February 24, 2014. Notice will be electronically mailed to: Roy Black Paul Cassell Bradley James Edwards Jay P. Lefkowitz Kathleen Mary Salyer Martin G. Weinb...”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
Appeals Court Orders Release of Emails Between Jeffrey Epstein’s Lawyers and Federal Prosecutors Over 2007 Non‑Prosecution Deal
The passage reveals a pending court‑ordered disclosure of communications that could show how a wealthy financier with ties to former presidents secured an unusually lenient non‑prosecution agreement. Eleventh Circuit ordered federal authorities to produce correspondence between Epstein’s attorneys a Deal allowed Epstein to avoid federal charges in exchange for pleading to a lesser state offense.
Victims win right to see negotiations that led to 'lenient' plea agreement for billionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein
The article reveals a court‑ordered release of 500 pages of correspondence between federal prosecutors and Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyers regarding a 2007 non‑prosecution agreement. It suggests possible po Eleventh Circuit ordered disclosure of ~500 pages of emails/letters between Epstein’s counsel and fe The 2007 agreement allowed Epstein to avoid federal charges in exchange for a state plea to a less
EFTA00206003
EFTA00206003 EFTA00206004 EFTA00206005 EFTA00206006 EFTA00206007 EFTA00206008 EFTA00206009 EFTA00206010 EFTA00206011 EFTA00206012 EFTA00206013 EFTA00206014 EFTA00206015 EFTA00206016 EFTA00206017 EFTA00206018 EFTA00206019 EFTA00206020 EFTA00206021 EFTA00206022 EFTA00206023 EFTA00206024 EFTA00206025 EFTA00206026 EFTA00206027 EFTA00206028 EFTA00206029 EFTA00206030 EFTA00206031 EFTA00206032 EFTA00206033 EFTA00206034 EFTA00206035 EFTA00206036 EFTA00206037 EFTA00206038 EFTA00206039 EFTA00206040 EFTA00206041 EFTA00206042 EFTA00206043 EFTA00206044 EFTA00206045 EFTA00206046 EFTA00206047 EFTA00206048 EFTA00206049 EFTA00206050 EFTA00206051 From: Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 12:27 PM To: Brad Edwards Subject: FYI Attachments: 111711Epstein NY Appellate Division Decision.pdf EFTA00206052 Hi Brad — The DA in New York sent this to me. I thought you might be interested. Also mentioned that if you and Paul want to send a proposed redacted
NY Post seeks to unseal sealed appellate briefs in Jeffrey Epstein appeal, exposing DA and prosecutor conduct
The filing reveals a concrete dispute over sealed court documents that could shed light on why the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office and Florida prosecutors allegedly gave Jeffrey Epstein preferent NY Post filed a motion (Dec 21, 2018) to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s SORA appeal, requestin Manhattan DA’s office (Danny Frost, Karen Friedman‑Agnifilo) initially opposed unsealing, citing C
Westlaw.
Westlaw. Pagel 749 F.3d 999, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1270 (Cite as: 749 F.3d 999) H United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Jane DOE NO. 1, Jane Doe No. 2, Plaintiffs-Appellees, 1. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Roy Black, Martin G. Weinberg, Jeffrey Epstein, Intervenors-Appellants. No. 13-12923. April 18, 2014. Background: Alleged minor victims of federal sex crimes brought action against the United States alleging violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act ( CVRA) re- lated to the United States Attorney Office's execution of non-prosecution agree- ment with alleged perpetrator. After the victims moved for disclosure of corres- pondence concerning the non-prosecution agreement, the alleged perpetrator and his criminal defense attorneys intervened to assert privilege to prevent the disclos- ure of their plea negotiations. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Court, No. 9:08-CV-80736-KAM, ordered disclosure. The inter- v
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I. UNITED STATES JOINT STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS The parties hereby stipulate and agree that the following facts are not in dispute and may be accepted as true: 1. Between about 2001 and 2006, defendant Jeffrey Epstein (a—billienaire—with—signifteant politieal-eenneetiens)-sexually-abusedinere-than-40 enticed into prostitution minor girls at his mansion in West Palm Beach, Florida, and elsewhere. Among the girls he sexually sed so enticed were Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2. Because Epstein, through others, used a means of interstate commerce and knowingly traveled in interstate commerce to engage in this conduct, te-abuse-Jane-Dee-#4-en43ane-Dee-#2-(and-the-ether-vietims), he committed violations of federal law, specifically repeated violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2422. 2. In 2006, at the request of the Palm Beach Police Department, the Federal Bureau of Inves
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.