Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00209494DOJ Data Set 9

Nos. 13-12923, 13-12926, 13-12928

Other

Nos. 13-12923, 13-12926, 13-12928 IN THE riiteb'tateg Court of appeabs FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT JANE DOE NO. 1 AND JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiffs-Appellees UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee ROY BLACK ET AL., Intervenors-Appellants REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS NON-PARTY INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFEE, WEISSING EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. Paul G. Cassell Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellees Jane Doe No.1 and Jane Doe No. 2 EFTA00209494 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 I. THIS COURT SHOULD IMMEDIATELY DISMISS EPSTEIN'S APPEAL IN LIGHT OF HIS CONCESSION THAT HE HAS NOT MADE A RECORD IN THE DISTRICT COURT THAT THE MATERIALS AT ISSUE ARE CONFIDENTIAL. 2 II. ANY INJURY TO EPSTEIN CAN BE RESOLVED AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEEDNGS BELOW AND THEREFORE THIS COURT LACKS JURISDICTION TO ENTERTAIN EPSTEIN'S INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL UNDER MOHAWK 7 EFTA00209495 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS NON-PARTY INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL I

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00209494
Pages
13
Persons
1
Integrity
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.