Subject: Fwd: WSJ follow-up question
Summary
Subject: Fwd: WSJ follow-up question Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 03:07:46 +0000 Importance: Normal FYI. The story was also on HLN. Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Gershman, Jacob" <Jacob.Gershman wsj com> Link to post: http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2015/01/05/behind-epstein-suit-a-tussle-over-due-process-and-victims-rights/ u • Itt: WSJ ralow-up question Hi, Jacob, Thank you for your inquiry. We will decline the opportunity to comment as the matter is ongoing. Best regards, From: Gershman, Jacob [mailto:Jacob.Gershmanwsj.corn] Sent: Monday, January 05 2015 4:54 PM Hi Marlene, I'm writing a follow-up post for WSJ's Law Blog looking at the "Jane Doe" lawsuit itself and the arguments put forward by the government and the plaintiffs. I just wanted to check to see if you wanted to include any additional EFTA00210105 comment on the merits of the lawsuit. At the moment, I'm just quoting from government briefs outlining its position. Thanks, Jacob Jacob Gershman
Persons Referenced (7)
“...mment on the Dec. 30th motion (attached) filed in JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #21 UNITED STATES (9:08-cv-80736), a lawsuit concerning the government's non-prosecution agreeme...”
Jane Doe #1“...'s office in Miami has any comment on the Dec. 30th motion (attached) filed in JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #21 UNITED STATES (9:08-cv-80736), a lawsuit concerning the gover...”
Jane Doe #2“...mi has any comment on the Dec. 30th motion (attached) filed in JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #21 UNITED STATES (9:08-cv-80736), a lawsuit concerning the government's non-prosecution agreement with Jeffre...”
U.S. Attorney“...28 PM ea ineque on Hi Marlene, I'm a reporter at WSJ. I wanted to know if the U.S. Attorney's office in Miami has any comment on the Dec. 30th motion (attached) filed in JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2...”
Alan Dershowitz“...e action, includes new allegations against Prince Andrew and Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz. I can be reached by email or by phone at Thanks, Jacob Jacob Gershman EFTA00210106...”
Jeffrey Epstein“...v-80736), a lawsuit concerning the government's non-prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein. As widely reported, the motion, which asks the court to allow two other women to join the action, incl...”
Prince Andrew“... to allow two other women to join the action, includes new allegations against Prince Andrew and Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz. I can be reached by email or by phone at Thanks, Jacob Jacob G...”
Tags
Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis
Extracted Text (OCR)
EFTA DisclosureRelated Documents (6)
5/19)22, 3:52 PM
5/19)22, 3:52 PM et Al..3 Ohle:R - CAC ‘,14S-AN Nriehn- 1-yo-nc 4\) Jeffrey EpsteM -1M k ipedia Epstein a massage". She claims she was taken to his mansion, : Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with November 30, 2018. her, and paid her $2OO immediately afterward.[196] • A similar $so-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer.(L.291 These and several similar lawsuits were dismissed. [1.19-] All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court.i1X-1 Epstein made many out-of-court settlements with alleged victims.P:t193 Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014 su Flts0SE Si KC; stim 1 N)Eccri ncs FT' (<) A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe 1 ( and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights ./W-by the U.S. Department of Justice's NPA with E stein and his limited 2008
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 64
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 64 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE No. 1 and JANE DOE No. 2 v. UNITED STATES AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. REGARDING NEED FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 1. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I represent Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 (as referred to as "the victims") in the above-listed action to enforce their rights under the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA). I also represented them (and several other victims) in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I am also familiar with the criminal justice system, having served as state prosecutor in the Broward County State Attorney's Office. 2. This affidavit covers factual issues regarding the Government's assertions of privilege to more tha
SUSPECTED MOTIVE BEHIND GOVERNMENT AND POLICE SOURCES INVOLVED
SUSPECTED MOTIVE BEHIND GOVERNMENT AND POLICE SOURCES INVOLVED IN CONSPIRED COVER UP OF FAMIL L MOLESTATION OF TARGETED VICTIM TH H R BY THE BROTHER FAMILY MEMBER ANTHEThra GATION AND CON- SPIRED ATTACK Or rit /WILY I O DEMORALISE THE DAUGHTER, SISTER AND DISCREDIT HER CREDITABILITY AND TARGETING HER WITH A SEXUAL ABUSE RING CONNECTED TO GOVERNMENT SOURCES AND EPSTEIN AND MAXWELL SUSPECTED MOTIVE OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS INVOLVEMENT : COMMENCEMENT - KADINA • JOHN OLSEN - MAYOR OF KADINA - LIBERAL GOVERNMENT MEMBER • ROWAN RAMSAY - FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MEMBER - KADINA AND PORT PIRIE The mother, i= suspected of being sexually active in the community of Kadina as a teenager invo ving sexual interaction with the government officials involved in Kadina John Olsen, Kadina and Rowan Ramsay, Kadina / Port Pine and the overnment officials knowledge of this sexual activity and manipulated by the mother to assist in the family secret cover up under the act of the motive of th
Virginia Roberts v. Alan Dershowitz – Allegations of Sex Trafficking, NPA Manipulation, and Defamation
The complaint provides a dense web of alleged connections between Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein, former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, and the 2008 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA). It cites specif Roberts alleges she was trafficked by Epstein from 2000‑2002 and forced to have sex with Dershowitz. Dershowitz is accused of helping draft and pressure the government into the 2008 NPA that shielded
919/22.3.-52 PM FeCi- (AAR oweR - Cie v‘s^4.1/4A; met;
919/22.3.-52 PM FeCi- (AAR oweR - Cie v‘s^4.1/4A; met; F, Re_sirrcric N , CP ST 6 N AOS-N an_ i csN CLO Ki tivte—Ykr n WikiPedia MAkVE C_ Epstein a massage She claims she was taken to his mansion, : Perversion of Justice, Miami Herald, where he exposed himself and had sexual intercourse with November 30, 2018. her, and paid her $200 immediately afterwand.220 A similar $50-million suit was filed in March 2008, by a different woman, who was represented by the same lawyer [??W These and several similar lawsuits were dismissed.139-1 All other lawsuits have been settled by Epstein out of court.' I Epstein made many out-of-court settlements with alleged victims.E13°1 Victims' rights: Jane Does v United States (2014) !i SCSC ei3eGE Psi1-<.-6 egot-tiiQeicil PUS iTt C4Z-S A December 3o, 2014, federal civil suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe 1 (Courtney Wild) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims',. Rights Act by the U.S.. Department of
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs I UNITED STATES, Defendants JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO THE GOVERNMENT REGARDING INFORMATION RELEVANT TO THEIR PENDING ACTION CONCERN THE CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS ACT COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ("the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, and request the defendant United States (hereinafter "the Government") to produce the original or best copy of the items listed herein below for inspection and/or copying, pursuant to the Court's Order (DE #99) directing discovery in this case. BACKGROUND As the Government will recall, the victims have asked the Government to stipulate to undisputed facts in this case. The Government has declined. Accordingly, the victims filed their Motion for Finding of Violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act and Request for a Hearing on Appropriate Remedies (DE 48
Forum Discussions
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.