Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00210752DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 261 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/08/2014 Page 1 of 2

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00210752
Pages
4
Persons
6
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 261 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/08/2014 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE I and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant INTERVENOR EPSTEIN'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR A SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER Now comes Intervenor, Jeffrey Epstein, who moves that this Honorable Court issue a supplemental Protective Order that would expand the limited Protective Order allowed in its decision Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Intervenors' Motion for a Protective Confidentiality Order. [D.E. 255 at 4]. The purpose of the proposed supplement to the previously ordered Protective Order is to require that any party would be required to file under seal any portion of the plea negotiation correspondence between the Government and Epstein's counsel, whether offered as an exhibit or quoted from in the content of a pleading or motion. Such a redacted filing

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 261 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/08/2014 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE I and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant INTERVENOR EPSTEIN'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR A SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER Now comes Intervenor, Jeffrey Epstein, who moves that this Honorable Court issue a supplemental Protective Order that would expand the limited Protective Order allowed in its decision Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Intervenors' Motion for a Protective Confidentiality Order. [D.E. 255 at 4]. The purpose of the proposed supplement to the previously ordered Protective Order is to require that any party would be required to file under seal any portion of the plea negotiation correspondence between the Government and Epstein's counsel, whether offered as an exhibit or quoted from in the content of a pleading or motion. Such a redacted filing would in all other respects be filed as a public filing unless subject to other orders of the Court, and each party would reserve the right to move to unseal any redacted pleading or sealed exhibit. After consultation with their counsel, both the Plaintiffs and the Government do not oppose the allowing of this Motion. EFTA00210752 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 261 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/08/2014 Page 2 of 2 Respectfully submitted, JEFFREY EPSTEIN By His Attorneys, /s/Roy Black Roy Black Jackie Perczek BLACK, SREBNICK, KORNSPAN & STUMPF, P.A. 1711...1 1 "IAA /s/Martin G. Weinberg Martin G. Weinberg CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HERE CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was filed via CM/ECF, this 8'h day of October, 2014. /s/Roy Black Roy Black 2 EFTA00210753 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 261-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/08/2014 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant PROPOSED ORDER OF CONFIDENTIALITY ("PROTECTIVE ORDER") THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Intervenor's Unopposed Motion for a Supplemental Protective Order. The Motion is hereby GRANTED, and it is ORDERED that: I. The Supplemental Protective Order applies to all correspondence between the United States Attorney's Office and the Intervenor and his counsel, including any attachments thereto, that was the subject of the Court's Order of June 18, 2013 [D.E. 188], hereinafter referred to as the "Confidential Discovery Material." 2. The Supplemental Protective Order incorporates the limited Protective Order of the Court's September 22, 2014 Order. [D.E. 255 at 4-5]. 3. The Parties and Intervenor are further ordered that the filing of any "Confidential Discovery Material" as defined in paragraph one of this Order EFTA00210754 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 261-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/08/2014 Page 2 of 2 shall be under seal, and further that any quotations from the "Confidential Discovery Material" in any pleading or motion shall be redacted from any public filing, with each party and the intervenor reserving the right to seek a further order unsealing the exhibit or the redacted portion of any filing. The Court also reserves the right to unseal any sealed exhibit or redacted portion of any filing with notice to the parties and intervenor. DONE and ORDERED in chambers in West Palm Beach Florida this fith day of October, 2014. Kenneth Marra United States District Judge cc: All Counsel 2 EFTA00210755

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 I. UNITED STATES JOINT STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS The parties hereby stipulate and agree that the following facts are not in dispute and may be accepted as true: 1. Between about 2001 and 2006, defendant Jeffrey Epstein (a—billienaire—with—signifteant politieal-eenneetiens)-sexually-abusedinere-than-40 enticed into prostitution minor girls at his mansion in West Palm Beach, Florida, and elsewhere. Among the girls he sexually sed so enticed were Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2. Because Epstein, through others, used a means of interstate commerce and knowingly traveled in interstate commerce to engage in this conduct, te-abuse-Jane-Dee-#4-en43ane-Dee-#2-(and-the-ether-vietims), he committed violations of federal law, specifically repeated violations of 18 U.S.C. § 2422. 2. In 2006, at the request of the Palm Beach Police Department, the Federal Bureau of Inves

132p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

GRAND JURY PRESENTATION

GRAND JURY PRESENTATION OPERATION LEAP YEAR I. INTRODUCTION A. New Indictment 1. Summarize Changes 2. Summarize Current Charges 3. Review Law/Instructions 4. Go through legal allegations in introduction B. Summarize How the Evidence Will Be Presented 1. Chart 2. Break Overt Acts into Two Categories: a. Meetings/Sexual Activity — Grouped by victim — Testimony re Interviews with the Girls b. Flights — Manifests C. Take Questions D. Call Special Agent Kuyrkendall H. RETURN DOCUMENTS RECEIVED IN RESPONSE TO SUBPOENAS ISSUED SINCE THE LAST DOCUMENT RETURN. A. Have additional subpoenas been issued on behalf of this grand jury regarding Operation Leap Year? And have documents been received in response to those subpoenas? What subpoenas were issued and what items were received? Did you bring those records with you today? KUYRICENDALL SUBSTANTIVE TESTIMONY A. Hand out summary chart 1. Review renumbering of Jane Does a. S/A Kuyrkendall: Can you explain

77p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 290 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2015 Page 1 of 14

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 290 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2015 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION TO JANE DOE #3 AND JANE DOE #4'S CORRECTED MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 21 FOR JOINDER IN ACTION Respondent United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Opposition to Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4's Corrected Motion pursuant to Rule 21 for Joinder in Action (D.E. 280), and states: I. PETITIONERS' MOTION TO ADD TWO ADDITIONAL PARTIES SHOULD BE DENIED AS UNTIMELY This action was commenced by Jane Doe #1 on July 7, 2008 (D.E. I). The Court ordered the Government to file a response by July 9, 2008, which was done. On July 11, 2008, the Court held a hearing on the emergency petition. At that hearing, Jane Doe #2 was added to the petition. Now, over six years into the litigation, petitio

14p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S INITIAL DISCLOSURES Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, makes its Initial Disclosures, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(A), and state: Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(A)fil: 1. R. Alexander Acosta Dean, School of Law Florida International University Rafael Diaz-Balart Hall 11200 S.W. 8'h Street Miami, Florida 33199 (305) 348-1118 Dean Acosta was the United States Attorney, Southern District of Florida, during the time when the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein was opened in the U.S. Attorney's Office, and the non-prosecution agreement was negotiated. 2. was the First Assistant U.S. Attorney in the U.S. Attorney's Office, during the time when the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein was opened, and the non-prosecution agreement was negot

10p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USAFLS)

(USAFLS) From: Roy Black < Sent: Wednesda , Februa 11, 2015 8:50 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Your phone call Great. Speak to you then. Original Message From: (USAFLS) Imailt Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 8:49 AM To: Roy Black Subject: Re: Your phone call Hi Roy. Thanks for your message. Dexter wants to participate in the call so it is helpful to have a roadmap of the discussion points. We will call your office at 2:00. If there is a better number to call, just shoot me an email. Talk to you soon. Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 S. Australian Ave, Ste 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 On Feb 10, 2015, at 7:35 PM, "Roy Black" < mailto: wrote: Marie I was not calling you about the correspondence so don't worry about that. I called you to discuss the plaintiff's replies filed as dockets 310 and 311. We think there are serious misstatements by them in these pleadings. So I just wanted to let you know what our suggested responses are.

389p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.