Skip to content
Dossier
AssociateMentioned

United States of America

Court Filing

Appellee

Mentioned in 5 documents. Roles: Appellee, Plaintiff, Plaintiff/Government, Government/Prosecution

Nationality
Black Book
Not listed
Share
PostReddit

United States of America is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.

At a Glance

Click values for sources
0
Flight appearances
Document mentions
52 court | 5 DOJ
Known connections
4 strong | 19 weak
No
Black book entry
Evidence Types
Court Filing

Known Connections (30)

The Court
The Court and United States of America appear together in 12 shared document ref...
12D
United States
United States of America and United States appear together in 22 shared document...
22D
Paul M. Daugerdas
Paul M. Daugerdas and United States of America appear together in 42 shared docu...
42D
Ghislaine Maxwell
Ghislaine Maxwell
Ghislaine Maxwell and United States of America appear together in 13 shared docu...
13D
Sting
Sting and United States of America appear together in 4 shared document referenc...
4D
Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein and United States of America appear together in 8 shared documen...
8D
United States Attorney
United States of America and United States Attorney appear together in 4 shared ...
4D
The defendant
The defendant and United States of America appear together in 5 shared document ...
5D
Debra Ann Livingston
Debra Ann Livingston
Debra Ann Livingston and United States of America appear together in 5 shared do...
5D
CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE
CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE and United States of America appear together in 6 shared...
6D
Ms. Conrad
Ms. Conrad and United States of America appear together in 8 shared document ref...
8D
Nathan
United States of America and Nathan appear together in 3 shared document referen...
3D
David Parse
David Parse and United States of America appear together in 2 shared document re...
2D
The Government
The Government and United States of America appear together in 2 shared document...
2D
Jeffrey Oestericher
Jeffrey Oestericher and United States of America appear together in 2 shared doc...
2D
The victim
United States of America and The victim appear together in 3 shared document ref...
3D
The Defendant
The Defendant and United States of America appear together in 3 shared document ...
3D
the Defendant
the Defendant and United States of America appear together in 3 shared document ...
3D
THE WITNESS
United States of America and THE WITNESS appear together in 2 shared document re...
2D
Audrey Strauss
Audrey Strauss
Audrey Strauss and United States of America appear together in 2 shared document...
2D
Minor Victim-1
Minor Victim-1 and United States of America appear together in 2 shared document...
2D
Minor Victim-3
Minor Victim-3 and United States of America appear together in 2 shared document...
2D
Minor Victim-2
Minor Victim-2 and United States of America appear together in 2 shared document...
2D
The Plaintiff
United States of America and The Plaintiff appear together in 3 shared document ...
3D
Judge Netman
Judge Netman and United States of America appear together in 2 shared document r...
2D
David K. Parse
United States of America and David K. Parse appear together in 2 shared document...
2D
Alison Nathan
Alison Nathan
Alison Nathan and United States of America appear together in 2 shared document ...
2D
Richard Berman
Richard Berman
Richard Berman and United States of America appear together in 2 shared document...
2D
Mr. Okula
Mr. Okula and United States of America appear together in 2 shared document refe...
2D
defendants
defendants and United States of America appear together in 3 shared document ref...
3D

Document Mentions (75)

Dept. of JusticeDec 19, 2025

This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. [EFTA00005711]

This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency; it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency. Embassy of the United States of America Office of the Legal Attache US Consulate Sydney NSW 200...

3p
Dept. of JusticeDec 19, 2025

ORIGINAL [EFTA00008585]

ORIGINAL Page 1 UNITED STATES GRAND JURY SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. APPEARANCES: August 2018 : Additional UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 40 Foley Square New York, New York 10007 July 2, 2019 12:43 p.m. Assistant Assistant Assistant United States U...

1p
Dept. of JusticeDec 19, 2025

UNITED STATES GRAND JURY [EFTA00008708]

UNITED STATES GRAND JURY SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GHISLAINE MAXWELL (2018R01618) APPEARANCE : November 19, 2019 Additional United States Courthouse 300 Quaroppas Street White Plains, New York July 8, 2020 10:05 a.m. Assistant United States Attorney Acting Grand Jury ...

1p
Dept. of JusticeDec 19, 2025

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT [EFTA00008874]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. SEALED INDICTMENT 20 Cr. COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts) The Grand Jury charges: OVERVIEW The charges set forth herein stem from the ro...

1p
Dept. of JusticeDec 19, 2025

GRAND JURY [EFTA00008998]

GRAND JURY EXHIBIT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) COUNT ONE (Conspiracy to Entice Minors to Travel to Engage in Illegal Sex Acts) The Grand Jury charges: OVERVIEW The char...

1p
House OversightUnknown

The document is a docketing notice for the appeal case United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket #...

The document is a docketing notice for the appeal case United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket #: 21-770), providing instructions to counsel on filing requirements, updating contact information, and reviewing the case caption. It outlines the necessary steps for appellate counsel to take following the docketing of the appeal.

1p
House OversightUnknown

The document outlines the requirements for filing a bill of costs, including the need for verificati...

The document outlines the requirements for filing a bill of costs, including the need for verification, service on adversaries, and adherence to specific formatting and cost guidelines. It references FRAP 39 and provides a link to a form on the Court's website. The case involves the United States of America v. Maxwell, with Judge Nathan presiding over the lower court case.

1p
House OversightUnknown

The document is a Verified Itemized Bill of Costs submitted by counsel in the case United States of ...

The document is a Verified Itemized Bill of Costs submitted by counsel in the case United States of America v. Maxwell, as per FRAP 39(c), requesting the Clerk to prepare an itemized statement of costs.

1p
House OversightUnknown

This is a court filing document from the case United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.,...

This is a court filing document from the case United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., dated February 24, 2012. The document appears to be a page from a larger filing, referencing a specific page number (268 of 671) and a date of February 15, 2012. It is related to a criminal trial involving allegations against Paul M. Daugerdas.

1p
House OversightUnknown

This is a transcript of the direct testimony of Conrad in the case United States of America v. Paul ...

This is a transcript of the direct testimony of Conrad in the case United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., on February 15, 2012. The case appears to involve allegations of tax shelter fraud. The testimony is part of the court record.

1p
House OversightUnknown

The document appears to be a transcript of a court proceeding in the case United States of America v...

The document appears to be a transcript of a court proceeding in the case United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., dated February 15, 2012. It includes references to specific pages and lines where certain terms were used. The term 'can' is highlighted with numerous citations.

1p
House OversightUnknown

The document appears to be a page from a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, featuring the dir...

The document appears to be a page from a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Conrad in the case United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.

1p
House OversightUnknown

The document appears to be a transcript of the direct testimony of Conrad in the case United States ...

The document appears to be a transcript of the direct testimony of Conrad in the case United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., on February 15, 2012. The testimony is part of a larger court proceeding. The specific details of Conrad's testimony are not clear from the provided snippet.

1p
House OversightUnknown

This is Volume XVI of XVII of an appendix filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second...

This is Volume XVI of XVII of an appendix filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, related to the case United States of America vs. David Parse. The document includes details about the case and the attorneys involved. It is part of a larger legal proceeding.

1p
House OversightUnknown

The court orders the removal of redactions from a letter filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP unless ...

The court orders the removal of redactions from a letter filed by Boies Schiller Flexner LLP unless the Government objects by March 29, 2021. The unredacted version is to be filed on March 30, 2021. The case is United States of America v. Ghislain Maxwell.

1p

Showing 15 of 75 documents. View all →

This dossier on United States of America was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.