Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00210859DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80636-KAM Mounieen290-2 EEktescelaborFESSCID0okke08,13,2010095 Page 1 of 27

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00210859
Pages
27
Persons
5
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

Case 9:08-cv-80636-KAM Mounieen290-2 EEktescelaborFESSCID0okke08,13,2010095 Page 1 of 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE No. 102, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Civil Action No 09-80656 CIV-RYSKAMP MAGISTRATE JUDGE VITUNAC I R! ED tw 't1 DC f!NTAKE MAY - 1 2009 STEVEN M. ‘AFeMORE CLERK U.S. OUST. CT COMPLAINT AND Defendant. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, brings this Complaint against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and states as follows: PARTIES. JURISDICTION. AND VENUE 1. At all times material to this cause of action, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. 2. This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse of a then minor. 3. At all times material to this cause of action, Defenda

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80636-KAM Mounieen290-2 EEktescelaborFESSCID0okke08,13,2010095 Page 1 of 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE No. 102, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Civil Action No 09-80656 CIV-RYSKAMP MAGISTRATE JUDGE VITUNAC I R! ED tw 't1 DC f!NTAKE MAY - 1 2009 STEVEN M. ‘AFeMORE CLERK U.S. OUST. CT COMPLAINT AND Defendant. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, brings this Complaint against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and states as follows: PARTIES. JURISDICTION. AND VENUE 1. At all times material to this cause of action, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. 2. This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse of a then minor. 3. At all times material to this cause of action, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstcin, had a residence located at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. 4. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is currently a citizen of the State of Florida, as he is currently incarcerated in the Palm Beach County Stockade. 5. At all times material to this cause of action, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, was an adult male born in 1953. Government Exhibit B Podhurst Orsecic, P.A. Case No. Government 25 West Flasks Street, Suite 80.:0, Miami. FL 33130. Miami 3C6.358.2800 Fax 305.358.1182 • Fort Lauderdale 954.4634346 I www.podlutrettom EFTA00210859 Case 9:08-cv-80656-KAM Moorneeti290-2 EEtteffleborfESSODeoistie06/01U1/0095 Page 2 of 27 6. This Court has jurisdiction over this action and the claims set forth herein pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255. 7. This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), as a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred in this District. STATEMENT OF FACTS 8. At all relevant times, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, was an adult male, spanning the ages of 45 and 55 years old. Epstein is known as a billionaire financier and money manager with a secret clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is a man of tremendous wealth, power, and influence. He owns a fleet of aircraft that includes a Gulfstream IV, a helicopter, and a Boeing 727, as well as a fleet of motor vehicles. Until his incarceration, he maintained his principal place of residence in the largest home in Manhattan. a 51,000-square-foot eight-story mansion on the Upper East Side. Upon information and belief, he also owns a $6.8 million mansion in Palm Beach, Florida, a $30 million 7,500-acre ranch in New Mexico he named "Zorro," a 70-acre private island known as Little St. James in St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, a mansion in London's Westminster neighborhood, and a home in the Avenue Foch area of Paris. The allegations herein concern Defendant's conduct while at his lavish homes and/or numerous other locations both nationally and internationally. 9. Upon information and belief, Defendant has a sexual preference for underage minor girls. He engaged in a plan, scheme, or enterprise in which he gained access to countless vulnerable and relatively economically disadvantaged minor girls, and sexually assaulted, molested, and/or exploited these girls, and then gave them money. 10. Beginning in or around 1998 through in or around September 2007, Defendant used his resources and his influence over vulnerable minor girls to engage in a systematic pattern of sexually exploitative behavior. Government Exhibit B Podhurst Orseck, P.A. Case No 4-80716-CIV-MARRA 25 West Hagler Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305.358.2800 Fax 305.3502382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 I vrww.pocIlmrst.com EFTA00210860 Case 9:08-cv-80656-KAM M000feet1290-2 EEteeideloorfESSODDoisat00/134O70095 Page 3 of 27 II. Defendant's plan and scheme reflected a particular pattern and method. Defendant coerced and enticed impressionable, vulnerable, and relatively economically less fortunate minor girls to participate in various acts of sexual misconduct that he committed upon them. Defendant's scheme involved the use of underage girls, as well as other individuals, to recruit other underage girls. Upon information and belief, Defendant and/or an authorized agent would call and alert Defendant's assistants shortly before or after he arrived at his Palm Beach residence. His assistants would call economically disadvantaged and underage girls from West Palm Beach and surrounding areas who would be enticed by the money being offered and who Defendant and/or his assistants perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility issues if allegations of improper conduct were made. The then minor Plaintiff and other minor girls, some as young as 12 years old, were transported to Defendant's Palm Beach mansion by Defendant's employees, agents, and/or assistants in order to provide Defendant with "massages." 12. Many of the instances of illegal sexual conduct committed by Defendant were perpetrated with the assistance, support, and facilitation of at least three assistants who helped him orchestrate this child exploitation enterprise. underage girls to come to Defendant's reside underage girls to Defendant's residence, escort Defendant would be waiting or would enter sho their clothes, deliver cash from Defendant to conclusion of each "massage appointment," a photographs and/or videos of the underage g 3 Government Exhibit B Podhurst Orseck, P.A. ft,th him At RO71 CR/ MAPPA 25 West blaster Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305358.2800 Fax 305358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 vniew.podluirst.com EFTA00210861 Case 9:08-cv-80636-KAM COommaen290-2 EEtcleyethorFESSEDIDolsk08374O70025 Page 4 of 27 13. Epstein designed this scheme to secure a private place in Defendant's Palm Beach mansion where only persons employed and invited by Epstein would be present, so as to reduce the chance of detection of Defendant's sexual abuse and prostitution as well as to make it more difficult for the minor girls to flee the premises and/or to credibly report his actions to law enforcement or other authorities. The girls were usually transported by his employees, agents, and/or assistants or by a taxicab paid for by Defendant in order to make it difficult for the girls to flee his mansion. 14. Upon arrival at Defendant's Palm Beach mansion, each underage victim would generally be introduced to one of Defendant's assistants, who would gather the girl's personal contact information. The minor girl would then be led up a flight of stairs to a room that contained a massage table and a large shower. The staircase leading to the room was plastered with nude photographs of young girls, including some photographs depicting two or more young girls engaged in lewd acts. Upon information and belief, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, had such photographs in each of his six homes and/or on his computers. 15. At times, if it was the girl's first "massage" appointment, another female would be in the room to "lead the way" until Defendant would have her leave. Generally, Defendant would start his massage wearing only a small towel, which eventually would be removed. Defendant and/or the other female would direct the girl to massage him, giving the minor girl specific instructions as to where and how he wanted to be touched, and then direct her to remove her clothing. He would then perform one or more lewd, lascivious, and sexual acts, including masturbation, fondling the minor's breasts and/or sexual organs, touching the minor's vulva, vagina, and/or anus with a vibrator and/or back massager and/or his fmger(s) and/or his penis, digitally penetrating her vagina, performing intercourse, oral sex, and/or anal sex, and/or coercing or attempting to coerce the girl to engage in lewd acts and/or prostitution and/or 4 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. Government Exhibit B Case No. 08-80736-CiV.MARFtA EFTA00210862 Case 9:08-cv-801356-KAM Utiourrrean290-2 EEtthaedeborFESSEDbolsii05O4010095 Page 5 of 27 enticing the then minor girl to engage in sexual acts with another female in Defendant's presence. The exact degree of molestation and frequency with which the sexual exploitations took place varied and is not yet completely known; however, Defendant committed such acts regularly on a daily basis and, in most Stances, several times a day. In order to facilitate the daily exchanges of money for sexual assault and abuse, Defendant kept U.S. currency readily available. 16. Defendant, Epstein, traveled to his mansion in Palm Beach for the purpose of luring minor girls to his mansion to sexually abuse and/or batter them. He used the telephone to contact these minor girls for the purpose of coercing them into acts of prostitution and to enable himself to commit sexual battery against them and/or acts of lewdness in their presence, and he conspired with others, including assistants and/or his driver(s) and/or pilot(s), and his socialite friend/partner, Ghislaine Maxwell, to further these acts and to avoid police detection. Defendant's systematic pattern of sexually exploitative behavior referred to in paragraph 10 and described in paragraphs 11 through the present paragraph occurred in all of Defendant's domestic and international residences and/or places of lodging and/or modes of transportation. 17. Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, Defendant used his money, wealth, and power to unduly and improperly manipulate and influence the then minor Plaintiff. A vulnerable young girl, Plaintiff was working as a changing room assistant at The Mar-A-Lago Club in Palm Beach making approximately 59 an hour when she was first lured into Defendant's sexually exploitative world. In or about the summer of 1998, when Plaintiff was merely fifteen years old while attending to her duties at Mar-A-Lago, Plaintiff was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell, who lived, traveled, socialized, and worked with Defendant. Ms. Maxwell asked Plaintiff if she was interested in learning massage therapy and earning a great deal of money while learning the profession. Plaintiffs father, who was a maintenance manager at The Mar-A- 5 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. overnment Exhibit B -C Ne, 4 8073C CA" ""^`W 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 3053582800 Fax 306.358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4316 www.podhurst.com EFTA00210863 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM DDoomeen290-2 EBtasysleborfESSODeolskt06/134O/0095 Page 6 of 27 Lago Club, was not apprehensive because he felt comforted that an older woman had approached Plaintiff with this opportunity. As a result, Plaintiffs father dropped off Plaintiff at Defendant's mansion that same day. Ms. Maxwell met Plaintiff and her father outside of Defendant's Palm Beach mansion, where Ms. Maxwell assured the minor girl's father that Ms. Maxwell would provide transportation home for his teenaged daughter. Ghislaine Maxwell led Plaintiff up a flight of stairs to a spa room with a shower and a massage table. Defendant was lying naked on the massage table. Plaintiff was shocked, but, with no experience with massages, thought this could be massage therapy protocol. Ms. Maxwell then took off her own shirt and left on her underwear and started rubbing her breasts across Defendant's body, impliedly showing Plaintiff what she was expected to do. Ms. Maxwell then told Plaintiff to take off her clothes. The minor girl was apprehensive about doing this, but, in fear, proceeded to follow Ms. Maxwell by removing everything but her underwear. She was then ordered to remove her underwear and to straddle Defendant. The encounter escalated, with Defendant and Ms. Maxwell sexually assaulting, battering, exploiting, and abusing Plaintiff in various ways and in various locations, including the steam room and shower. At the end of this sexually exploitive abuse, Defendant and Ms. Maxwell giddily told Plaintiff to return the following day and told her she had "lots of potential." Defendant paid Plaintiff hundreds of dollars, told her it was for two hours of work, and directed one of his employees to drive her home. 18. Defendant and/or his procurers thereafter lured the then minor Plaintiff to his Palm Beach mansion every day for the next two weeks in order to engage in a similar pattern of sexual exploitation. Defendant and/or his procurers arranged at the end of each incident the transportation and scheduling for the following day's appointment. Additionally, Defendant telephoned the minor Plaintiff himself and/or had Ms. Maxwell telephone Plaintiff to make arrangements. Plaintiff was often times driven to and from Epstein's mansion by Epstein 6 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. Government Exhibit B Case No. 0I -80736-CIV-MARRA 1.1111 1,11...11.11C I ICI 9921 • c.... I Ora AIAL EFTA00210864 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM DOoomeen290-2 EBteeErefeborfESSEDIDoiret06/0441/0095 Page 7 of 27 himself or his driver. Alternatively, Defendant or Ms. Maxwell would arrange and pay for Plaintiff's transportation home by taxicab. 19. During Plaintiffs second incident of being sexually exploited and assaulted by Defendant at Defendant's Palm Beach mansion, Defendant asked Plaintiff to quit her job at The Mar-A-Lago Club and travel with him to earn much more money while learning the massage profession. Thus, Plaintiff, an impressionable and vulnerable young girl of modest means, quit her job as a changing room assistant, was lured by Defendant, and continued to be victimized by Defendant, who immersed the minor Plaintiff into Defendant's lewd and abusive lifestyle. Under Defendant's dominion and control, Defendant continuously "groomed" the minor adolescent. Defendant's daily routine required the minor Plaintiff to perform sexually on Defendant multiple times per day and to provide Defendant massages multiple times per day. Plaintiff had absolutely no say as to when, how many times, or what was done during each sexual encounter. Often, Plaintiff was joined by Ms. Maxwell, Ms. Maxwell's assistant, and/or a countless array of young women who would be brought to one of Defendant's homes for the sexual trysts and then be sexually exploited by Defendant. 20. The first time that Defendant transported Plaintiff to another state in order to engage in sexual acts with her occurred when she was merely fifteen years old and after only two weeks of daily sexually abusive encounters with Defendant. Defendant used his private jet to transport the minor Plaintiff to Manhattan, where he provided her with spending money and accommodations with him at his mansion. From the time that Plaintiff was 15 years old, Defendant abused her to serve his every sexual whim, obtaining and purchasing passports and whatever was needed for her to travel with him and/or for him. Defendant transported Plaintiff in his private jet to locations that included Palm Beach, New York City, Santa Fe, Los Angeles, San Francisco, St. Louis, and numerous other domestic destinations, as well as international 7 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. overnment Exhibit B t Ce...,e N.,. 0 8073C CiV mAnnA 25 West Flagler Street. Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305358.2800 Fax 305358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 www.podhursteom EFTA00210865 Case 9:08-cv-80036-KAM Ceouureen290-2 EEtttenioborFESSCEOolck08,13,2T2095 Page 8 of 27 destinations, including Europe, the Caribbean, and Africa. He provided accommodations with him in order to have her available to him at all times wherever he went, including while transporting the minor Plaintiff on his private jet. Each time they would travel to one of these destinations, the same pattern of sexual abuse would occur, often with a vast array of aspiring models, actresses, celebrities, and/or other females, including minors, from all over the world. Upon information and belief, Defendant transported minor girls from Turkey, the Czech Republic, Asia, and numerous other countries, many of whom spoke no English. To Plaintiff's knowledge, the only females specifically excluded from Defendant's sexual escapades were African-Americans. 21. In addition to being continually exploited to satisfy Defendant's every sexual whim, Plaintiff was also required to be sexually exploited by Defendant's adult male peers, including royalty, politicians, academicians, businessmen, and/or other professional and personal acquaintances. Whenever Defendant transported Plaintiff with him in his private jet to any destination, Defendant would pay Plaintiff a flat rate per day while he and/or his above- mentioned associates would sexually exploit and abuse minor Plaintiff. 22. Most of these acts of abuse occurred during a time when Defendant knew that Plaintiff was approximately 15, 16, and 17 years old, and, after years of daily sexual exploitation, continued into her adulthood. Despite Defendant's stating shortly before Plaintiffs sixteenth birthday that he soon would have to trade her in because she was getting too old, Defendant continued to sexually exploit Plaintiff until she fled at age 19. Defendant's predilection for young girls was well known to those who regularly procured them for him and to his circle of friends. On one of Defendant's birthdays, a friend of Defendant sent him three 12-year-old girls from France who spoke no English for Defendant to sexually exploit and abuse. After doing so, they were sent back to Fiance the next day. 8 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. overnment Exhibit B -30730•CIV•MAR1$ 25 West Hagler Street, Suite 800, Muni, F1.33130, Miami 305358.2800 Fax 305.358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 www.podhunt.com EFTA00210866 Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Moomeet)290-2 EBteeffleborfESSCDDoithe08/74,01095 Page 9 of 27 23. Any assertions by Defendant that he was unaware of the age of the then minor Plaintiff are belied by his own actions, and are rendered irrelevant by the provision of applicable federal statutes concerning the sexual exploitation and abuse of a minor child. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, at all times material to this cause of action, knew and should have known of Plaintiff's age of minority. Defendant and Ms. Maxwell acknowledged and celebrated Plaintiff's 10h birthday. Defendant's preference for underage girls was well-known to those who regularly procured them for him. 24. As previously stated in paragraph 14, Defendant displayed nude photographs of underage girls throughout his homes in New York City, Palm Beach, Santa Fe, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, saw photographs of naked young girls in each of Defendant's homes, including a photograph of herself naked at Defendant's home in Palm Beach. When she asked Defendant about it, he stated dismissively that he had naked photographs of her in all of his homes. 25. Upon information and belief, some of the photographs in Defendant's possession were taken with hidden cameras set up in his home in Palm Beach. On the day of his arrest, police found two hidden cameras and photographs of underage girls on a computer in Defendant's home. Upon information and belief, Defendant may have taken lewd photographs of Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, with his hidden cameras and may have transported lewd photographs of Plaintiff (among many other victims) to his other residences and elsewhere using a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce. In addition, while Plaintiff was a minor teenager and upon Ms. Maxwell's insistence after Ms. Maxwell rejected as inappropriate photographs that Plaintiff presented of herself fully clothed, Ms. Maxwell photographed Plaintiff naked in different sexually explicit positions. Ms. Maxwell then presented these nude photographs of Plaintiff to Defendant as a birthday present for Defendant from Ms. Maxwell. 9 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. overnment Exhibit B N... 0073C OW MAMIA 25 West Hagler Street. Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 3053582800 Fax 305.3582382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 www.podhwstcom EFTA00210867 CemengSDIR-etal6S6KAXIVI Document 290-2 nEnteted ftriSDalioDoill45101112012915Ptitjegel aelfc1/7 27 Upon information and belief, one or more nude photographs of Plaintiff that were taken when she was a minor were confiscated by the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office during its execution of a search warrant of Defendant's Palm Beach mansion on October 20, 2005. Upon information and belief, those photographs are still in the custody of law enforcement. 26. It is virtually impossible to calculate the exact number of times that Defendant sexually exploited and abused Plaintiff. From the age of 15, Plaintiff was sexually exploited and abused by Defendant on a daily basis and, most often, multiple times each day. While some of the precise dates these acts occurred are unknown to Plaintiff, these dates are known to Defendant, as he is reported to have kept a written log of each instance in which he engaged in these lewd acts with then minor Plaintiff and others. Upon information and belief, these logs are also in the custody of law enforcement. 27. In or around September 2002, Defendant purchased a commercial round-trip airline ticket, and provided a passport, U.S. currency, and accommodations for Plaintiff to fly to Thailand. While thousands of miles away from Defendant on this extended trip alone for the first time in more than four years, Plaintiff met, fell in love, and married a young man. She escaped from Defendant's abuse with the help and insistence of her new husband and, instead of returning to Defendant, boarded a plane to Australia with one suitcase. 28. Since November 2002, Plaintiff has lived a modest life in Australia, while maintaining lines of communication with her family and without contact with Defendant or any of the people in his entourage. However, suddenly, in 2008, Plaintiff received numerous phone calls from one of Defendant's agents. During these phone calls to Plaintiff, he repeatedly asked whether she knew anything about the civil cases against Defendant, whether she knew any of the females who were proceeding with the civil suits, whether she was planning on filing suit, whether she was communicating and/or cooperating with anyone against Defendant, and whether 10 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. Government Exhibit B Case No. 13-80736-CIV-MARRA 9% Weal Flavin Simi. qiiih• NIA Miami PI himI Miami insiSAM IY1 ray Mg icR /1R7 a Pam I ..Aswiela ate SA1 ALA ....II. WWII...WA •••••••• EFTA00210868 CasseStaft-434366t3641kleA Doannent 290-EnErteted ELSDSionadeb,011123C2915 PEA -111±27 27 she would return to the United States to testify. Terrified by Defendant's demonstrated ability to track her down on her changed cell phone number halfway across the world, Plaintiff attempted to reassure Defendant's agent that she would remain quiet. During the course of one of these phone calls from Defendant's agents, Defendant himself spoke on the phone, continued to question her intentions, and, upon being reassured by Plaintiff, thanked her for not getting involved. 29. Around January 2009, Plaintiff received a letter from the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, informing her of her potential civil claims against Defendant under 18 U.S.C. § 2255. Plaintiff contacted undersigned counsel within days and diligently and repeatedly pursued a good faith viable settlement of her claims against Defendant. Unable to reach a settlement, this lawsuit followed. 30. As a result of these encounters with Defendant, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's controlling and manipulating her on a daily basis for years into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. 31. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, committed the above-referenced acts upon Plaintiff in violation of federal statutes condemning the coercion and enticement of a minor to engage in prostitution or sexual activity, travel with intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, sex trafficking of children, sexual exploitation of minor children, transport of visual depictions of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct, transport of child pornography, child exploitation enterprises, and other crimes, specifically including, but not limited to, those crimes designated 11 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. overnment Exhibit B Case No 0 007r C" "NPR!, 25 West Flagler Street Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305.358.2800 Fax 305358.2382 • Fat Lauderdale 954.463.4346 onvw.podhurstcorn EFTA00210869 Casseliat-e&DES6602MA Deatnent 290-En Fenteted frilLSDallacidkattO1182OO915 Pti 2.Dt27 27 in 18 U.S.C. § 2421, § 2422(a), § 2422(b), § 2423(a), § 2423(b), § 2423(e), § 2251, § 2252, § 2252A(a)(1), and § 2252A(gXl). 32. In June 2008, after investigations by the Palm Beach Police Department, the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, entered pleas of "guilty" to various Florida state crimes involving the solicitation of minors for prostitution and the procurement of minors for the purposes of prostitution in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses committed against Plaintiff and, as such, must admit liability unto Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102. Plaintiff hereby exclusively seeks civil remedies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255. COUNT ONE (Cause of Action for Coercion and Enticement of Minor to Ennee in Prostitution or Sexual Activity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. & 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. & 2422(611 33. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above. 34. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, used a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce to knowingly persuade, induce, entice, or coerce Jane Doe No. 102, when she was under the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution and/or sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempted to do so, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). 35. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 12 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. Government Exhibit B "'sea kin 1 11117'2A Pa/ MAQPA 25 West Hagler Street, Suite 802 Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305358.2800 Fax 306358.2382 • Fat Lauderdale 954.463A346 www.podhurstam EFTA00210870 CtismSSIDEbie438661136410261 Document 290-EnEnteteti fib.SDSIDEIcE88165,011/2012015 Pigged abfrat7 27 36. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT TWO (Cause of Action for Transportation of Minor with Intent to Encase in Criminal Sexual Activity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. & 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. & 2423(8)1 37. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 32 above. 38. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly transported then minor Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, in interstate and/or foreign commerce, with the intent that Plaintiff engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, in violation 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a). As previously stated in paragraphs 20, 21, and 27, 13 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. Government Exhibit B rnen Mn frnc"rna romoon 25 West Hagler Street, Suite 800, Miszni, FL 33130, Miami 305.3587800 Fax 305.3582382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 www.podbuntxont EFTA00210871 Cesese SSEtAc-,8617660(101v1 Document 2 90 -E n Er ete¢i Nfr.SDalittlatilde$ 03142610)15 P 27 e: el 4.41(27 Defendant transported Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, across state lines and across international borders numerous times from the time that Plaintiff was merely 15 years old through adulthood with the primary intent of sexually exploiting her. 39. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 40. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages. attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. 14 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. Government Exhibit B raCa Kin rt 4671A Nu MARRA 25 West Hagler Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, ?Sarni 305.358.1800 Fax 305.358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 951.463.4346 www.podhurstcorn EFTA00210872 Caost929e-e80517680k1OVI Docement 290-2 nenteted ErLSD9rodortkitt5,0111200215 Petjegel 5.Zufc27 27 COUNT THREE (Cause of Action for Travel with Intent to Eneaze in Illicit Sexual Conduct pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 8 2423(b)) 41. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above. 42. Upon information and belief, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, traveled in interstate and/or foreign commerce with the intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2423(f), with minor females, including the then minor Plaintiff, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b). 43. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 44. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the funny suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, 15 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. Government Exhibit B flt RO7'4A_Plid sapper 25 West Flatlet Street. Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305358.2803 Fax 305.358.7382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463/316 www.podhursttOm EFTA00210873 Ce.sese giRtet4243513€KAISIVI Document 290-2 nEeteted CeSDS:IDDEliatkitt5,01112012915 PEA ellifc27 27 actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT FOUR (Cause of Action for Coercion and Enticement to Entaze in Prostitution or Sexual Activity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. & 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. & 2422(0) 45. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 32 above. 46. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly persuaded, induced, enticed, and/or coerced Jane Doe No. 102 to travel in interstate and/or foreign commerce to engage in prostitution and/or sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempted to do so, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(a). 47. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant. Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 48. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn 16 Podhurst Orseck, L.A. Government Exhibit B rnta MnN nt 14071A r MARRA 25 West Flagkr Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 3053582300 Fax 305.3582382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463 4346 www.podhuntcom EFTA00210874 CasesigSDIkt-v8436616-64A1414 Dommert 290-EnErteked Erti.SD9ripEloitkat501112012915 Pagegt9 7Lbfc27 27 income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT FIVE (Cause of Action for Transportation with Intent to Entate in Criminal Sexual Activity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 6 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 6 24211 49. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above. 50. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly transported, or attempted to transport, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, in interstate and/or foreign commerce, with the intent that Plaintiff engage in prostitution and/or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2421. As previously stated in paragraphs 20, 21, and 27, Defendant transported Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, across state lines and across international borders numerous times from the time that Plaintiff was merely 15 years old through adulthood with the primary intent of sexually exploiting her. 51. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 52. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, 17 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. overnment Exhibit B ere Ne B -80736-641/ V ^PRA 25 West Flagler Street Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305.358.2800 Fax 3055358.2382 Fort Lauderdale 954.4(3.4346 www.podhurstcom EFTA00210875 Cassel SKRAetetigEWAKevl Document 290-2 nEnteted ErtLEDSLedort145,0111202915 Ptigege abfcit7 27 psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life for a minor. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT SIX Itause of Action for Sexual Exploitation of Children pursuant to 18 U.S.C. & 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C.$ 22511 53. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above. 54. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly persuaded, induced, enticed, or coerced the then minor Plaintiff to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing a visual depiction of such conduct, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251. As previously stated in paragraphs 14, 24, and 25, TN. ne.,1 ..1" ....An .4.n...en-nat.., ,,f throughout his U.S. Virgin Isla of Defendant's 18 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. overnment Exhibit B Case It,. 0 oona CIV MARfbk 25 West Raster Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305.358.2800 Fax 3053582382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 www.podbunt.com EFTA00210876 Ce.oselitActeE5643OkAIN Document 290-EnErected ErLSDSIoDortkitt5,01112042915 PEA litfc1/7 27 Ratarh I lnnn i nfnrma Finn nriti belief msanv of the nhntnornnhs in the nnesecsinn of Defendant elsewhere using a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce. Upon information and belief, one or more nude photographs of Plaintiff that were taken when she was a minor were confiscated by the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office during its execution of a search warrant of Defendant's Palm Beach mansion on October 20, 2005. Upon information and belief, those photographs are still in the custody of law enforcement. 55. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 56. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn 19 Government Exhibit B Podhurst Orstrl, P.A. Case No. 01-80736-CIV-MARFtA 25 MS Rimier Fawn. Suit. Mil. Miami. FT. MINI. AM 2PM FAN 1115 15/1 2182 • Flirt I asminniale 954 4414146 www milmrat ram EFTA00210877 CtIseelkiktActefigGEKAPIN Document 290-E nEtteted En_SD9rodonkfit5,031/20(2B15 Ptigege(201c27 27 income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries arc permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT SEVEN (Cause of Action for Transport of Visual Depiction of Minor Enzaaing in Sexually Explicit Conduct pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 4 2252(a)(1)) 57. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above. 58. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly mailed, transported, shipped, or sent via computer and/or facsimile in or affecting interstate and/or foreign commerce at least one visual depiction of the minor Plaintiff engaging in sexually explicit conduct, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(1). As previously stated in paragraphs 14, 24, and 25, Defendant displayed a myriad of nude photographs of underage girls throughout his homes, including his homes in New York City, Palm Beach, Santa Fe, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, saw photographs of naked young girls in each of Defendant's homes, including a photograph of herself naked as a minor at Defendant's home in Palm Beach. As previously stated in paragraph 24, Defendant told Plaintiff that he had photographs of her naked in all of his homes. Upon information and belief, many of the photographs in the possession of Defendant were taken with hidden cameras set up throughout his home in Palm Beach. On the day of his arrest, police found two hidden cameras and nude photographs of underage girls on a computer in Defendant's home. Upon information and belief, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, may have taken lewd 20 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. Government Exhibit B Case No. 0 -60736-CIV.MARFtA Weactilsalertfre•ra tn,,n NYI Miami rl 1111/1 Miami W 1CS 1/31111 r., 1111 VS 11117 • Fen. I an Aa.Aalu Oct 60.11141.4 ‘An&r••• mr.lhoninner. EFTA00210878 Cease 211a-letetiBERKAXIVI Document 290-2 nEnteted EttiSDSIDDElortI415,01112012915 Pane bfc1/7 27 photographs of Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, with his hidden cameras and may have transported lewd photographs of Plaintiff (among many other victims) to his other residences and elsewhere using a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce. Upon information and belief, one or more nude photographs of Plaintiff that were taken when she was a minor were confiscated by the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office during its execution of a search warrant of Defendant's Palm Beach mansion on October 20, 2005. Upon information and belief, those photographs are still in the custody of law enforcement. 59. As previously stated in paragraph 23, any assertions by Defendant that he was unaware of the age of the then minor Plaintiff are belied by his actions and rendered irrelevant by the provision of applicable federal and state statutes concerning the sexual exploitation and abuse of a minor child. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, at all times material to this cause of action, knew and should have known of Plaintiff's age of minority. Defendant's preference for underage girls was well-known to those who regularly procured them for him. 60. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 61. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and 21 Podhurst Orsecic, P.A. overnment Exhibit B Cos., N.,. 0 00730 CIV MARRA 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305.158.2800 Fax 305.3582382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 www.podhurstcom EFTA00210879 CaseseginAot416588OkX61 Docuarnert 290-E nEnteteth etb_SIMoDoitkii15,011121142915 Pajegt222,t27 27 psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries arc permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT EIGHT (Cause of Action for Transport of Child Pornoeraphv pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 6 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. & 2252A(a)(111 62. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above. 63. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly mailed, transported, shipped, or sent via computer and/or facsimile in or affecting interstate and/or foreign commerce child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(aXI). 64. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 65. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and 22 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. overnment Exhibit B Cel.,e it— 0 8073C C IY MA1111A 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800. Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305.358.2800 Fax 305358.2382 • Port Lauderdale 954.463.4346 www.podhurn.com EFTA00210880 Cease 5041ac2465680kKitl Document 290-E n Enteted aspsroocatleS/011/202015 P agog eabfcrt7 27 leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the figure. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. COUNT NINE (( au cc of Action for Engaging in a Child Exploitation Enterprise pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. S 2252A(01 66. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 32 above and Counts One through Eight above. 67. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, knowingly engaged in a child exploitation enterprise, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(gX2), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(gX1). As more fully set forth above, Defendant engaged in actions that constitute countless violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1591 (sex trafficking of children), Chapter 110 (sexual exploitation of children in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2251, 2252(a)(1), and 2252(AXaX1)), and Chapter 117 (transportation for illegal sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2421, 2422, and 2423). As more fully set forth above in paragraphs 9 through 32, Defendant's actions involved countless victims and countless separate incidents of sexual abuse, which he committed against minors, including Plaintiff, in concert with at least three other persons. 23 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. overnment Exhibit B 25 West Hagler Street Suite 800, Miami, F1.33130, Miami 305.358.2800 Fax 3053582382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 www.podhunt.com EFTA00210881 Cased, SDSRActaititWAPIv1 Document 290-EnErected StiSD91CODoilkibb011121Y2B15 PlitgigE2L24cli 7 27 68. Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to this Section of the United States Code. 69. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future suffer additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, demands judgment against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury. Date: May 1, 2009 ktta Pirs44—art...6. _12 Ka E Robert C. Josefsbferg, Bar No. 0408563 Katherine W. Ezell, Bar No. 114771 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, Florida 33130 (305) 358-2800 (305) 358-2382 (fax) riosefsberganodhurst.com 24 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. overnment Exhibit B 25 West Hagler Street, Suite 800, Miami, FL 33130, Miami 305358.2800 Fax 305358.2382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.463.4346 www.podinustcom EFTA00210882 CeseitS 99-a-c-,8003660Whil Doturrieral 290-E n Entertect fittSDSIDElactlet 01112042915 Nilgegt225t3/7 27 kezell(alpodhurst.com Attorneys for Plaintiff DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff demands to have her case tried before a jury. 866A Lir-1444-c c-• Robert C. Jose Bar No. 040356 Katherine W. Ezell, Bar No. 114771 25 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. overnment Exhibit B Oe..5 Nei. 0 0073C IV MAMA 25 West Flagler Street. Suite 800. Mlamj, FL 33130, Miami 305358.7800 Fax 3053582382 • Fort Lauderdale 954.163.4316 wrnv.poilhurstcorn EFTA00210883 cassessac-tesessemoim Document 290-Eng:sleeted EtiSDSIDDE1oxtre65,011/200215 NV40264:127 27 'J 544 (Rew. 1145) CIVIL COVER SHEET The JS 44 civil raver Shed and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This loan, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United Slates in September 1974. isrequired for the use of the Clat of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE OF THE FORM.) NOTICE: Attorneys MUST Indicate All Re -fled Cases Below. I. (a) PLAINTIFFS Jane Doe No. 102 (b) County of Residence of First Lined Plaintiff West Palm Beach (EXCEPT IN US. PLAINTIFF CASES) (C) Attorney's (Mira Name. Aden. and Telephone Number) Robert C. Josefsberg. Esq./Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 W. Flagler St., Suite 800 Miami Fl nitro 0`11 -#%- CA/ - .806st- (d) Check County Where Action Arose. 1>IIA511 D s DT 1 Mon ROI II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION wise an - X (Jnc Box Only) II I U.S. Mos crtunent ,/1I Federal Question Plaintilf ICS Gosemment Not a Party) ET 2 U.S. llostnuncnt Defendant s 4. Dluye D PALM BEACH nat. 4 Diverse) Dedicate Cenendup of Pangs in hem III) DEFENDANTS Jeffrey Epstein Courtly of Residence of Ent Listed Defendant West Palm Beach (IN U.S. PLAINTIFECAS"OnL9 NOM IN LAND CONDEMNATION C/Warba&f, JJ) 114 LAND INVOLVED. INTAKE. f ri Attorneys (IOrson) MAY . 1 2009 Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., AtterburX Gold ger, et al.. 250 S. JIJ Australian Ave., 81400, West Palm'BeatthkFENIS4Rhilt1Sobeit CLEM< ' A O'er O MARTIN O ST. LUCIE I INDISIEROMLAI E MIJIMERCBA HIGHLANDS III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIESietwe an -X- is Ott Box for Plantar (For Diversity Caw WTI and One Box for DeRridarn PIT DEE PIT DVS Citizen of Ibis State 7' I I Incorporated or Principal Place 1 4 0 4 of Bonnets In This Stale Citizen of. nother State 0 2 O 2 numerated and Motion Place O 5 0 5 of Business In Another Sate Citizen or Subject of • 0 3 1 3 Foreign Ninon Fc.eign COUTilly 0 6 3 6 L COMet TO IttS F0RFEITURERENALTY BANERIJPTCY DINER SI A IllEs 1 110 Inmate 120 Marine 130 Stiller AM 140 Negotiable Immonerd 150 Recopy of °save/mom & Enforcement of Judgment 151 Medicare Act 152 Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans (Excl. Veterans) 0 153 Recovery of Themownent of Vonan's Benefits 0 160 Sseckholden' Suits 0 1900ther Contract 0 195 Contract Product Liability O 196 Franchise PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY El 310 Aldan 0 362 Personal Injury • 0 315 Militant Pietism Med. Malpractitt Liability O 365 Personal Injury - 0 320 Assault. Libel a Product Liability Slender O 363 Asbestos Personal 1 310 Federal Employers' bitty Prockn Liability Liability 0 MOMarine PERSONAL PROPERTY 0 M5 Maine Product I 370 Offer Fond Libility 3 371 Truth UlLembew 0 350 Motor Vchick n MO Orher Miami 0 353 Motor Vehicle Property Damage Product liability n 385 Omen). Damme El 360 Other Personal Product liability bluer 0 610 Agriculture 0 620 Other Food & Drug 3 623 DrIlit R erased kirure of Property 21 USC 881 0 630 Liquor Laws 0 640 R.R. & Truck 0 650 Airline Rees. 0 660 Occupational SaferyMealib 0 690 Other 0 422 Appeal 28 USC 158 0 423 Withdrawal 28 CSC IP 400 Slate Rennonloamem 410 Among 430 Banks and asedung 430 Commerce 460 Deponimon 470 Racketed Influenced and Corrupt Organizations 480 Consumer Credo 490 CabloSat TV 810 Seketioe Service 850 SeasitiesConnodince Eachinge 875 Customer Clullenge 12 USC3410 890 Other Stansory Actions 891 Agenkural Acis 892 Economic Subilin ion Act 893 Emironmental Mann 894 Energy Allocation An 895 Freedom or Intonation Act 900Appcal of Foe Duennination Under Equal Access to Justice 0 950 Cantinatornlity of Staie Statutes MB1,Tildriattrelit: J S20( onngtas 0 830 Pain 0 S40 Tnidunark LABOR SOCIAL SfURITY 1 361 111A 1139318 0 862 Black Lung (921) 0 863 DIVAVD1%6W ‘405(g)) 0 864 SSID Tide XVI 0 865 R51(40500) 0 710 Fair tabor Stiodards Ad 0 720 LabooMpnt. Relations 0 T30 LabonMgmt.Reponing & Disclosure Act 0 740 Railway Labor Ad 0 79000ter Labs Lanni 0 791 Einpl Ret. Inc. Security Act FEDERAL TAX SUITS I REAL PROPERTY CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS 0 870 Ines (US. Plaintiff or Deluders) O 871 IRS— this paw 26 USC 7609 0 210 Land Condemnation 0 220 Forecbsure O 230 Rua Inst & Ejectment O 240 Tons tot and O 245 Ton Product Lida ley O 290 All Other Real Property 0 441 Voting 0 442 Employment 0 443 Ilona& Accommodations O 444 Waite 0 445 Amer. wilksabithies . EmPloYmen 0 446 Amer. anDirobilitics • Other 3 440OtherCivil Rights 1 510 Motions to Vat Suitcase Habeas Corpus: 1 530 General 1 535 Death Penaky 1 540 Mandamus & On CI 550 Civil Rigs; 0 555 hisce Condition V. ORIGIN (Place a 'X" imOne Box (My) Transferred from I Original fi 2 Removed an r1 3 Re-filed- 0 4 Reinstitute( O 5 amtherdisuict 0 6 Mtdlidistrict Proceeding to Court (see VI below) y) litigation Appeal to District CI , idge from ' Magistnitc Jo:lament VI. RELATED/RE-FILED CASE(S). aeatl (See lunation' patch. a) Re-filed Case 0 YES ja NO JUDGE Kenneth A. Marra b) Related Cases OYES CI NO DOCKET See Attached NUMBER VII. CAUSE OF ACTION (tense U.S. ('nil Statute under which you ace filing and Write a Brief Statement of-Cause (Do Dot cite jurlidktional statutes )Mess dIvenhy): 18 U.S.C. 2255 (Predicate Statutes 18 U.S.C. 2422(b). 2423(b), 2423(e), 2251, 2252. 2252A(a)( l), 2252A(g)( I) LENGTH OF TRIAL via 4 days estimated (for both sides to try entire ease) O CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION DEMAND S CHECK YES only if demanded 'n complaint UNDER F.R.C.P. 23 JURY DEMAND: 10 Yes p No VIII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT: ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE & CORRECT TO TIDE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE SIG TURE 01: ATTORNEY 1 7 0 DATE R 06FTCE USE ON.ea AMOUNT4 RECEIPTAt Cal.Ift B32) Case No. 013-ID7303-_Cly-MARRA) VS AD 5)1) 01 EFTA00210884 Cam® 99a-T-CIRCUSPKAMA Document 290-EnEnoEted frtiSIALDE1oit1e5011120/2915 PEgsge2bfclf 7 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION ATTACHMENT TO CIVIL COVER SHEET FOR: Jane Doe 101.v. Jeffrey Epstein VI: RELATED/RE-FIELD CASE(S): 08-80069 08-80119 08-80232 08-80380 08-80381 08-08804 08-80811 08-80893 08-80993 08-80994 08-80469 09-80591 Government Exhibit B Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA EFTA00210885

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of 40 EXHIBIT 16 EFTA00081180 Case 9:08-cv-807m091349pept Z91-15 _EriterM ocp WERocisstifolf/E15 Page 2 of roio-< uoc 16q0,3 e 0 EXHIBIT C Epstein vs. Edwards Undisputed Statement of Facts EFTA00081181 Case 9:08-cv-807ailaVs kigsyffigt 28415-c1p6Arger phri N 7NRocieatgfe)10/§815 Page 3 of IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No.: 50 2009 CA 040800XXXKMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY I EDWARDS, individually, Defendants, STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS Defendant Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., offers the following specific facts as the undisputed material facts in this case. Each of the following facts is numbered separately and individually to facilitate Epstein's required compliance with Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c) ("The adverse party shall identify . . . any summary judgment evidence on wh

40p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Attorney Bradley Edwards alleges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, 5th Amendment tactics, and a unique George Rush tape as key evidence ...

The affidavit details a non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Epstein from federal charges, claims that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment to block discovery, and describes a purportedly Epstein secured a federal non‑prosecution agreement that barred criminal charges for ~30 victims in All co‑defendants and Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, leaving plaintiffs with no substantive

23p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 65 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion To Stay And Or Continue Action For Time Certain Based On Parallel Civil And Criminal Proceedings With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN") by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby moves this Court for the entry of an order staying or continuing this action for a time certain (i.e., until late 2010 when the NPA expires), pursuant to the application of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the fact that a parallel proceeding is ongoing and being investigated. In support of his motion, EPSTEIN states: I. Introduction At the outset, EPSTEIN notes this Court's prior Order, (DE 33), in which this Court denied a motion for stay brought by Def

56p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM

Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05)04.2009 Page 1 of 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE No. 102, Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Civil Action No 09-80656 ClV-RYSKAMP MAGISTRATE JUDGE VITUNAC I FILED by iti 3 D C INTAKE MAY - 12009 STEVEN M. 6ARIMORE J. C A R. OF FLA. MIAMI COMPLAINT AND Defendant. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, brings this Complaint against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and states as follows: PARTIES. JUFUSDICTION, AND VENUE 1. At all times material to this cause of action, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, was a resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. 2. This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 102, because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse of a then minor. 3. At all times material to this cause of action, Defen

27p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Jeffrey Epstein non‑prosecution agreement and alleged high‑level connections revealed in multiple Palm Beach filings

The passage aggregates numerous contemporaneous reports about a secret non‑prosecution agreement that allowed billionaire Jeffrey Epstein to avoid federal charges, mentions specific federal actors (U. Sealed non‑prosecution agreement between Epstein and U.S. Attorney's Office (2007‑2008) prevented fe Agreement granted immunity to co‑conspirators Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, Nadia Marc

25p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Extensive court filing outlines alleged Jeffrey Epstein abuse network, non‑prosecution deal, and potential ties to high‑profile figures (Clinton, T...

The document provides a dense compilation of alleged facts, emails, deposition excerpts, and discovery requests that link Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual‑abuse operation to a “pyramid” recruitment scheme, a Epstein allegedly ran a “pyramid” scheme paying underage victims $200‑$300 per recruited girl. A 2007 non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with the U.S. Attorney’s Office allegedly shielded Epstein fr Ema

39p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.