From: '

From: ' (USAFLS)" ctl l" To: " USAFI gr> (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Response to Paul's email? Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:29:23 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: USA_Response_to_First_Requestfor Admissions.docx a Here it is. From: (USAFLS) Sent FrIda March 10, 2017 11:45 AM To: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Response to Paul's email? By the way, I can't find our response to petitioners' first request for admissions. Do either of you have them handy? From: (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 11:38 AM To: (USAFLS) 'c '; Subject: Response to Paul's email? and M, (USAFLS) Here's my overlong draft response. I don't love it, and it presently includes everything I think we could, but might not necessarily want to, say. What do you think about trying to reach out to Valerie Parlave and Junior Ortiz today to confirm that they also had no communications or info concerning the matters addressed in the supplemental discovery requests? By the way, I know we were operating under extensions, but did we ever send written responses to either the supplemental request for admissions or the supplement request for production? If not, should we get that done soon? Should we also close the loop with former WPB Chief Reiter, even though we have confirmed from our side that the petitioners' contentions involving him are bogus? EFTA00211049