Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00211093DOJ Data Set 9Other

From: "Lee, Dexter (USAFLS)" <[email protected]>

From: "Lee, Dexter (USAFLS)" <[email protected]> To: "Blumenschein, John M. (OGC) (FBI)" <[email protected]> Cc: "Ball, Julio (MM) (FBI)" <[email protected]>, "Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)" <AVillafana®usa.doj.gov>, "Sanchez, Eduardo (USAFLS)" <ESanchez1 ®usa.doj.gov>, "Bessee, Cecilia O. (OGC) (FBI)" <[email protected]>, "Stanford, Jennifer L. (OGC) (FBI)" [email protected]>, "Jacobs, James T. (OGC) (CON) (FBI)" <James.Jacobs®ic.fbi.gov> Subject: RE: Jane Doe 1 and 2 1 United States Petitioners' Fourth Request for Production Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 16:08:00 +0000 Importance: Normal John, We asked for and received a thirty day extension on November 4, 2016. Our due date is December 5, 2016. Thanks. Dexter Lee From: Blumenschein, John M. (OGC) (FBI) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2016 10:57 AM To: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) <[email protected]> Cc: Ball, Julio (MM) (FBI) <[email protected]>; Villafana, An

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00211093
Pages
2
Persons
3
Integrity

Summary

From: "Lee, Dexter (USAFLS)" <[email protected]> To: "Blumenschein, John M. (OGC) (FBI)" <[email protected]> Cc: "Ball, Julio (MM) (FBI)" <[email protected]>, "Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)" <AVillafana®usa.doj.gov>, "Sanchez, Eduardo (USAFLS)" <ESanchez1 ®usa.doj.gov>, "Bessee, Cecilia O. (OGC) (FBI)" <[email protected]>, "Stanford, Jennifer L. (OGC) (FBI)" [email protected]>, "Jacobs, James T. (OGC) (CON) (FBI)" <James.Jacobs®ic.fbi.gov> Subject: RE: Jane Doe 1 and 2 1 United States Petitioners' Fourth Request for Production Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 16:08:00 +0000 Importance: Normal John, We asked for and received a thirty day extension on November 4, 2016. Our due date is December 5, 2016. Thanks. Dexter Lee From: Blumenschein, John M. (OGC) (FBI) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2016 10:57 AM To: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) <[email protected]> Cc: Ball, Julio (MM) (FBI) <[email protected]>; Villafana, An

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: "Lee, Dexter (USAFLS)" <[email protected]> To: "Blumenschein, John M. (OGC) (FBI)" <[email protected]> Cc: "Ball, Julio (MM) (FBI)" <[email protected]>, "Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)" <AVillafana®usa.doj.gov>, "Sanchez, Eduardo (USAFLS)" <ESanchez1 ®usa.doj.gov>, "Bessee, Cecilia O. (OGC) (FBI)" <[email protected]>, "Stanford, Jennifer L. (OGC) (FBI)" [email protected]>, "Jacobs, James T. (OGC) (CON) (FBI)" <James.Jacobs®ic.fbi.gov> Subject: RE: Jane Doe 1 and 2 1 United States Petitioners' Fourth Request for Production Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 16:08:00 +0000 Importance: Normal John, We asked for and received a thirty day extension on November 4, 2016. Our due date is December 5, 2016. Thanks. Dexter Lee From: Blumenschein, John M. (OGC) (FBI) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2016 10:57 AM To: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) <[email protected]> Cc: Ball, Julio (MM) (FBI) <[email protected]>; Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) <[email protected]>; Sanchez, Eduardo (USAFLS) <[email protected]>; Bessee, Cecilia O. (OGC) (FBI) <[email protected]>; Stanford, Jennifer L. (OGC) (FBI) <[email protected]>; Jacobs, James T. (OGC) (CON) (FBI) [email protected]> Subject: RE: Jane Doe land 2i United States - Petitioners' Fourth Request for Production Dexter, Nice talking with you as well. What is the turnaround on this? Best regards, John M. Blumenschein Assistant General Counsel Discovery Coordination and Policy Unit Office of the General Counsel Federal Bureau of Investigation Office: (202) 324-2337 I Cell: (202) 631-0246 [email protected] Confidentiality Statement: This message is transmitted to you by the Office of General Counsel of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The message, along with any attachments, may be confidential and legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please destroy it promptly without further retention or dissemination (unless otherwise required by law). Please notify the sender of the error by a separate email or by calling (202) 324-2337. From: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 3:45 PM To: Blumenschein, John M. (OGC) (FBI) Cc: Ball, Julio (MM) (FBI); Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Sanchez, Eduardo (USAFLS) Subject: Jane Doe 1 and 2 1 United States - Petitioners' Fourth Request for Production EFTA00211093 John, I appreciate you taking the time to speak with me this morning about the request for production served upon the government in this Crime Victims Rights Act case. I have attached the request, which contains eight (8) separate requests. The first seven pertain to emails that may exist on FBI servers. Petitioners' attorneys are seeking emails generated by FBI personnel regarding potential improper influences being exerted by Jeffrey Epstein on United States Attorney's Office senior officials, including U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta; Criminal Division Chief Matt Menchel; and Supervisory AUSA (West Palm Beach) Andew Laurie. The requests list specific FBI agents who may have generated such emails. The Jeffrey Epstein matter was brought to the U.S. Attorney's Office in 2006, as an investigation into sexual abuse of minor girls. A grand jury investigation was opened, and records were sought from various sources. In 2007, Epstein's attorneys sought a global resolution of the case, which would encompass the state court charge of soliciting prostitution, and the federal investigation pertaining to sexual abuse of minors. In September 2007, a non-prosecution agreement was signed by Epstein, his attorneys, and the U.S. Attorney's Office. Nevertheless, Epstein sought review of the NPA at the DOJ Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, claiming there was no basis for a federal criminal prosecution. In May 2008, Child Exploitation and Obscenity concluded that the U.S. Attorney was acting within his broad discretion in pursuing the case. Epstein next sought review with the Deputy Attorney General's Office. In early June 2008, the Deputy A/G concluded that the U.S. Attorney did not abuse his discretion in pursuing the case. On June 20, 2008, Epstein entered pleas of guilty in Palm Beach Circuit Court, in accordance with the terms of the NPA. On July 7, 2008, Jane Does 1 and 2 filed their CVRA lawsuit. We are seeking responsive emails for the period 2006 to 2008. I understand these emails would only exist if they had not been "double deleted;' and they would be on the Unclassified server. I would appreciate your assistance in designing an inquiry that would seek emails responsive to requests 1 through 8. If you need assistance, please let me know. I can be reached at (305) 961-9320, or on the cell, (786) 564-9114. Thank you. Dexter Lee EFTA00211094

Technical Artifacts (13)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 70

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 1 of 70 EXHIBIT A PRIVILEGE LOG - WITH VICTIMS' OBJECTIONS EFTA00208682 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 224-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 2 of 70 PRIVILEGE LOG - WITH VICTIMS' OBJECTIONS Key to Objections (linking to Victims' Motion to Compel Production of Docments that Are Not Prig ileged Objection General Objections -- Inadequate Privilege Log Failure to Prove Factual Underpinnings of Privilege Claim Waiver of Confidentiality Government's Fiduciary Duty to Crime Victims Bars Privilege Communications Facilitating Crime-Fraud-Misconduct Not Covered Factual Materials Not Covered Documents Not Prepared in Anticipation of CVRA Litigation Attorney Client Objections - Ordinary Governmental Communications Not Covered Attorney-Client Relationship Not Established Deliberative Process Objections - Privilege Not Properly Invoked Final Decision Exempted from Privilege Qualified Privilege Ove

70p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 and #2 Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION TO VICTIMS' MOTION TO UNSEAL NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT Respondent, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Opposition to Victims' Motion to Unseal Non-Prosecution Agreement, and states: I. THE MOTION TO UNSEAL SHOULD BE DENIED BECAUSE THE NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT HAS NEVER BEEN FILED UNDER SEAL IN THIS COURT. Petitioners have filed their motion to unseal the non-prosecution agreement, claiming that no good cause exists for sealing it. As an initial matter, the motion should be denied because the non-prosecution agreement entered into between the United States Attorney's Office and Jeffrey Epstein was never filed in the instant case by the United States, either under seal or otherwise. On August 14, 2008, this Court held a telephonic hearing to discuss petitioners' r

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Memorandum

Memorandum Subject Re: Operation Leap Year Date May 1, 2007 (Revised 9/13/07) (2nd Revision 2/19/08)' To From R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney First Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Criminal Division MAUSA, Northern Region , Chief, Northern Region I. Introduction This memorandum seeks approval for the attached indictment char in Jeffrey Epstein, Min a/k/a' JEGE Inc., and Hyperion Air, Inc. The proposed indictment contains 60 counts and seeks the forfeiture of Epstein's Palm Beach home and two airplanes? The FBI has information regarding Epstein's whereabouts on May 16th and May 19th and they would like to arrest him on one of those dates. Epstein is considered an extremely high flight risk' and, from information we have received, a continued danger 'The second revision amends the Jane Doe numbering system to correspond with the most recent indictment. It also removes the references to the overt acts and substantive allegations related to each

53p
OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 329 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/23/2015 Page 1 of 2

DOJ EFTA Data Set 10 document EFTA01325031

20p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S INITIAL DISCLOSURES Respondent United States of America, by and through its undersigned counsel, makes its Initial Disclosures, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(A), and state: Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1)(A)fil: 1. R. Alexander Acosta Dean, School of Law Florida International University Rafael Diaz-Balart Hall 11200 S.W. 8'h Street Miami, Florida 33199 (305) 348-1118 Dean Acosta was the United States Attorney, Southern District of Florida, during the time when the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein was opened in the U.S. Attorney's Office, and the non-prosecution agreement was negotiated. 2. was the First Assistant U.S. Attorney in the U.S. Attorney's Office, during the time when the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein was opened, and the non-prosecution agreement was negot

10p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.