Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00211196DOJ Data Set 9Other

To: "'Paul Cassell"

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00211196
Pages
3
Persons
3
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: To: "'Paul Cassell" Cc: Subject: RE: Tracking down materials Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 15:33:03 +0000 Importance: Normal "'Brad Edwards"' <[email protected]> Hi Paul — I hope that are well. I have been out of the office for a bit, but have been working on your requests. 1.1as been in contact with the FBI and they are checking on whether there are responsive emails and how we go about accessing any, should they exist. I know that we had some conversation about narrowing the requests, but we believe that you need to try to narrow them in writing so that we can determine whether we need to apply to the Court to quash or limit the requests. As written, and even following the discussion, they are so broad and vague that we do not feel that we can respond. Some seem to call for a search of every government computer file, which would be impossible. Do you want to try to be more specific and, in the meantime we will continue our efforts with the FBI and with items tha

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: "'Paul Cassell" Cc: Subject: RE: Tracking down materials Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 15:33:03 +0000 Importance: Normal "'Brad Edwards"' <[email protected]> Hi Paul — I hope that are well. I have been out of the office for a bit, but have been working on your requests. 1.1as been in contact with the FBI and they are checking on whether there are responsive emails and how we go about accessing any, should they exist. I know that we had some conversation about narrowing the requests, but we believe that you need to try to narrow them in writing so that we can determine whether we need to apply to the Court to quash or limit the requests. As written, and even following the discussion, they are so broad and vague that we do not feel that we can respond. Some seem to call for a search of every government computer file, which would be impossible. Do you want to try to be more specific and, in the meantime we will continue our efforts with the FBI and with items that are fairly specific (e.g., you specifically refer to which is something we have been and can continue to look into)? The certificates of service specify different dates, but my records show that they were served on August 31g, is that consistent with your records? Thanks so much. Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida From: Paul Cassell Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 3:18 PM To: 'Brad Edwards' <[email protected]> Cc: Subject: RE: Tracking down materials Just wanted to touch base and see how things are coming collecting the information that we talked about on the phone on September 2, if I recall correctly? As mentioned, I hopefully gave you precise enough information that finding the materials would not have been time consuming on your end. Just wanted to see if you had any more questions about that. Brad and I can assist if needed. Paul Cassell for Jane Doe 1 and 2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law University Distinguished Professor of Law S J Ouinnev College of Law at the University of Utah EFTA00211196 Lura-lucil I IP.L. WI] Illeb>cte • caul% mei eityien WIllItluntial. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: Paul Cassell Sent: Wednesday, Au ust 31, 2016 3:28 PM To: Brad Edwards Cc Subject: RE: Conf call re scheduling and discovery? I free at that time on Friday — 3 PM Florida time, 1 PM Utah time. Glad to chat. Please call my cell, a Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law University Distinguished Professor of Law I Chlinnev rnllecie nf I AW at the I Inivercitv nf !Nab PC CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. Professor Cassell is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Thank you. From: Brad Edwards Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 3:26 PM To: Cc: Paul Cassel Subject: Re: Conf call re scheduling and discovery? I have a deposition Friday afternoon but don't need to be on the call if Paul is free. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 31, 2016, at 5:15 PM, wrote: Hi Brad and Paul — Can we do a conference call to talk about the schedule? I am totally booked tomorrow and Dexter has a mediation on Friday morning, so I was hoping we could chat at 3:00 on Friday. Please let me know if that works and I will set up a conference line. Thanks. EFTA00211197 Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida EFTA00211198

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: FW: OPR inquiry - request for information

From To Subject: FW: OPR inquiry - request for information Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 16:31:22 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: motion-intervene.pdf; sanctions-motion-attached.pdf This is Cassell's response to Bruce Reinhart's motion to intervene. From: Paul rakeoll [- Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 12:23 PM To: Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: RE: OPR inquiry - request for information Dear As you will have seen, Bruce Reinhard has filed a motion to intervene in our Crime Victims' Rights Act case. (Since has not been served, I attach a copy of the pleading to this e-mail). As you will see, Reinhard claims that we have no factual basis for making an assertion that (for example) Reinhard improperly represented in violation of Justice Department regulations. In view of this motion, we are writing to inquire into the current status of the Justice Department's inquiry into Reinhard's conduct. We also believe that the Justice Department has access to information that will support

4p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subjec

Fr • < > Subjec :Deliberative t Process ec aratton rom am Justice - equest or wo ee xtension Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:59:47 +0000 Importance: Normal We have no objection, provided we get the following accommodation, which you already anticipated. We would request that your motion for extension of time give us an extension on our reply document, such that our reply would be due 10 days after the main Justice Department declaration that will be coming in two weeks. If you would include such language as well in any proposed order, saving us (and the court) drafting time, that would be very much appreciated. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: '

From: ' (USAFLS)" To: >, ' (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Motion to Compel and S.J. Briefing Schedule Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 19:38:15 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi I.— You can get me on the line once calls in. I will be at my desk — 41047 A. Vi&faller Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida From: M, (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 2:11 PM To:a (USAFLS) < Cc:a MI I. (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Motion to Compel and Si. Briefing Schedule I am out of class at 5:15 pm. What number shall I call? Sent from my iPhone c On Mar 8, 2017, at 11:56, a, (USAFLS) > wrote: Can we talk later this afternoon? Begin forwarded message: From: Paul Cassell <a> Date: March 8, 2017 at 8:51:03 AM EST To: "Brad Edwards (USAFLS)" Cc: " I. (USAFLS)" '`= > (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Motion to Compel and S.J. Briefing Schedule Dear I'm writing to express some concerns about the Government's recent response to our most recent discovery requests and to request a stipulated bri

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subject: Re: Motion to Compel and S.J. Briefing Schedule

From: To: Cc: Subject: Re: Motion to Compel and S.J. Briefing Schedule Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 20:25:09 +0000 Importance: Normal 6:00pm is fine for me. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 8, 2017, at 15:22, Either is fine. I will be here late. From: Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 3:16 PM To: Subje : : o ion o ompe an S.J. rie ingc e ue wrote: I have a conference call at 5pm. It should be over by 6pm, if not earlier. Can we talk at 6pm or I can email you if my conference call ends earlier? From: Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 2:38 PM To: Subject: RE: Motion to Compel and S.i. Briefing Schedule You can get me on the line once alls in. I will be at my desk -= From Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 2:11 PM To: Cc: Subject: Re: Motion to Compel and S.J. Briefing Schedule I am out of class at 5:15 pm. What number shall I call? EFTA00211070 Sent from my iPhone On Mar 8, 2017, at 11:56, Can we talk later this afternoon? Begin forwarded message: From: Paul Cassell < Da

3p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

From: Paul Cassell

From: Paul Cassell To: Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: ere o "e tan on t e ropose tatement of Facts? Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 21:24:26 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi Brad and I both agree that we need to get the facts resolved first, then discuss where we go from there. At the same time, we want to get this moving along. Can we set a specific time line for getting the facts resolved — is there a time that works for you and in the near future to have a conference call? Then is there a specific time shortly after Thanksgiving that would workyou're your U.S. Attorney? Paul Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law http://www.law.utah.edu/profiles/default.asp?PersonID=S7&name=Cassell Paul CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use

4p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.