Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00211475DOJ Data Set 9Other

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00211475
Pages
5
Persons
6
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 ("Petitioners") and the United States of America ("Respondent") (jointly referred to as "the parties") have agreed that a fair, efficient, and cost effective resolution of this dispute would avoid the unnecessary expenditure of substantial resources to litigate the dispute and hereby stipulate to the adequacy of consideration exchanged; and WHEREAS, the parties have negotiated in good faith and agreed that the best interests of all parties will be served by a settlement of this proceeding; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and recitals herein, the parties intending to be legally bound, agree as follows: 1. The parties have agreed to settle the above-captioned lawsuit upon the following terms and conditions. For pu

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 ("Petitioners") and the United States of America ("Respondent") (jointly referred to as "the parties") have agreed that a fair, efficient, and cost effective resolution of this dispute would avoid the unnecessary expenditure of substantial resources to litigate the dispute and hereby stipulate to the adequacy of consideration exchanged; and WHEREAS, the parties have negotiated in good faith and agreed that the best interests of all parties will be served by a settlement of this proceeding; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and recitals herein, the parties intending to be legally bound, agree as follows: 1. The parties have agreed to settle the above-captioned lawsuit upon the following terms and conditions. For purposes of this Agreement, the parties agree that the terms "Victim" and "Victims" refer to the persons whom the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("the USAO-SDFL") has previously disclosed as persons whom it was prepared to name as victims in an indictment of Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"). That list of all Victims is attached EFTA00211475 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN hereto in Sealed Appendix "A." 2. Petitioners agree to enter into a Stipulation of Dismissal with Respondent. The case shall be dismissed with prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs, fees, and expenses. Petitioners agree that dismissal with prejudice of their claims is a final judgment on the merits. 3. Respondent agrees that the United States Department of Justice ("the Justice Department"), including the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI"), will maintain the USAO-SDFL's and the FBI's files and original evidence related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators until December 31, 2018, notwithstanding any general rule or regulation regarding maintaining and destroying evidence in closed matters. Should the USAO-SDFL or the FBI's Miami Field Office receive any properly served federal grand jury subpoena, other appropriate law enforcement request, or federal court order for such evidence, that evidence will be made available in accordance with governing federal laws and regulations. 4. If any Victim files an appropriate FOIA or Privacy Act request upon the FBI seeking access to information related to her victimization by Epstein, Respondent agrees to respond promptly and will work with the Victim's counsel to address issues of privacy and privilege in an attempt to avoid unnecessary litigation. 5. Following the filing of the stipulation of dismissal and the Court's entry of an order of dismissal, Petitioners and any Victim will have the opportunity to attend a joint meeting with the current U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida to express their concerns about the Epstein investigation and its resolution. 6. Respondent agrees not to oppose a motion filed by Petitioners seeking a hearing 2 EFTA00211476 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN before United States District Judge Kenneth A. Marra in which Petitioners and any Victim may address the Court. Should any Petitioner or Victim wish to submit a written statement to be read into the record by Petitioners' counsel at such hearing, Respondent agrees not to object to the use of a written statement in lieu of live testimony before the Court. Respondent agrees not to oppose motions to file such written statements with the Victims' names redacted and to redact from the hearing transcript the names of any Victims who may elect to address the Court in person, so long as an unredacted transcript is filed under seal. 7. Respondent agrees to forward Petitioners' written proposed amendments to the "Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance," the "U.S. Attorney's Manual," and the procedures for filing complaints with the Justice Department's Crime Victims' Rights Ombudsman to the individuals charged with revising and updating those documents and procedures. [INSERT TITLES OF THESE PARTIES] 8. Respondent agrees that, if, within one year of the execution of this Settlement Agreement, any Victim decides to file a claim application with Florida's Bureau of Victim Compensation ("BVC") and that claim is rejected because the victim does not have a police report, the Victim can contact the victim-witness coordinator for the FBI Palm Beach Resident Agency who will assist the Victim in procuring documentation that the crime was reported to the FBI. Petitioners understand that, although BVC receives federal funds, it is not governed by Respondent and Respondent cannot insure that a claim filed by any victim will be accepted or paid by BVC. [THIS PARAGRAPH WILL NOT WORK. I AM TRYING TO DETERMINE ANOTHER SOLUTION.] 3 EFTA00211477 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN 9. The parties will file a joint motion to unseal the pleadings listed in Appendix B to this Agreement and a joint motion asking the Court to return to Respondent all documents submitted for in camera review. 10. Petitioners agree to release and hold harmless Respondent and its agents, employers, representatives and other persons acting in or on its behalf, from any and all claims, actions, demands, damages, causes of action, suits and proceedings of whatever kind or description, that might now or hereafter exist on account of and in connection with any matters relating directly or indirectly to the Petition and above-captioned litigation. Each party shall bear its own costs fees and expenses incurred at all stages of these proceedings. II. This Settlement Agreement is not, is in no way intended to be, and should not be construed as, an admission of liability or fault on the part of the United States, its agents, servants, or employees, and it is specifically denied that they are liable to Petitioners. Ill /// /// 4 EFTA00211478 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN 12. This is the entire agreement and understanding between Petitioners and Respondent. There are no other agreements, promises, representations, or understandings. This Agreement may not be amended except in writing. EXECUTED this day of May, 2016. FOR PETITIONERS: FOR RESPONDENT: FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, WIFREDO A. FERRER EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. By: Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the C.W., Individually Petitioner Jane Doe 1 T.M., Individually Petitioner Jane Doe 2 5 EFTA00211479

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

CM/ECF - Live Database

CM/ECF - Live Database r Page 1 of 3 U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80736-KA M Doe'. United States of America Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Cause: no cause specified Date Filed: 07/07/2008 Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant LRJ Date Filed # Docket Text 07/07/2008 1 EMERGENCY PETITION for Victim's Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act 18 USC 3771 against United States of America Filing fee $ 350. Receipt#: 724403, filed by Jane Doe. (rb) (Entered: 07/07/2008) 07/07/2008 2 CERTIFICATE OF EMERGENCY by Jane Doe re 1 Complaint (rb) (Entered: 07/07/2008) 07/07/2008 3 ORDER requiring U.S. Attorney to respond to 1 Complaint filed by Jane Doe by 5:00 p.m. on 7/9/08. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 7/7/08. (ir) (Entered: 07/07/2008) 07/09/2008 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Dexter Lee on behalf of United States of America (

204p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USAFLS)

(USAFLS) From: Roy Black < Sent: Wednesda , Februa 11, 2015 8:50 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Your phone call Great. Speak to you then. Original Message From: (USAFLS) Imailt Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 8:49 AM To: Roy Black Subject: Re: Your phone call Hi Roy. Thanks for your message. Dexter wants to participate in the call so it is helpful to have a roadmap of the discussion points. We will call your office at 2:00. If there is a better number to call, just shoot me an email. Talk to you soon. Assistant U.S. Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 S. Australian Ave, Ste 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 On Feb 10, 2015, at 7:35 PM, "Roy Black" < mailto: wrote: Marie I was not calling you about the correspondence so don't worry about that. I called you to discuss the plaintiff's replies filed as dockets 310 and 311. We think there are serious misstatements by them in these pleadings. So I just wanted to let you know what our suggested responses are.

389p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 58

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 58 Entered on FLSD Docket 04707/2011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO JANE DOES #1 AND #2'S MOTION TO HAVE THEIR FACTS ACCEPTED BECAUSE OF THE GOVERNMENT'S FAILURE TO CONTEST ANY OF THE FACTS IDE491 The United States, by and through the undersigned, hereby opposes Petitioners' Motion to have their "Statement of Undisputed Material Facts" accepted as true [DE49]. Petitioners argue that the Court should accept their Statement as true, despite its conclusory allegations and internal inconsistencies, solely because of the United States' failure to stipulate to the Statement. The Court should deny the motion because: (1) Petitioners have misstated that United States' efforts at reaching agreement on the Statement; (2) the "Undisputed Material Facts" are irre

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 290 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2015 Page 1 of 14

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 290 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2015 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION TO JANE DOE #3 AND JANE DOE #4'S CORRECTED MOTION PURSUANT TO RULE 21 FOR JOINDER IN ACTION Respondent United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Opposition to Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4's Corrected Motion pursuant to Rule 21 for Joinder in Action (D.E. 280), and states: I. PETITIONERS' MOTION TO ADD TWO ADDITIONAL PARTIES SHOULD BE DENIED AS UNTIMELY This action was commenced by Jane Doe #1 on July 7, 2008 (D.E. I). The Court ordered the Government to file a response by July 9, 2008, which was done. On July 11, 2008, the Court held a hearing on the emergency petition. At that hearing, Jane Doe #2 was added to the petition. Now, over six years into the litigation, petitio

14p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 330 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/06/2015 Page 1 of 51

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 330 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/06/2015 Page 1 of 51 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:08-CV-80736-ICAM JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER This cause is before the Court on various discovery related matters. In response to Petitioners' first requests for production, the respondent Government asserted various privileges in three privilege logs and submitted nearly 15,000 pages of documents for in camera inspection. (DEs M-1, 216-1, 329-1). Petitioners object to every privilege asserted. (DE 265). Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein supports the Government's assertion that certain grand jury materials should remain secret, and he moves to prevent disclosure of those materials. (DE 263). Petitioners filed a response. (DE 271). Finally, the Government objects to the relevancy of several of Petitioners' requests for production. (DE 260). Petitioners respon

51p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.