Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00211579DOJ Data Set 9

To: "'Paul Cassell" <[email protected]>

Other

To: "'Paul Cassell" <[email protected]> Cc: "Brad Edwards ([email protected])" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Briefing Schedule Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:45:23 +0000 Importance: Normal Hi Paul - Great. That would make our reply due December 12th. I think your proposal makes sense. The Office's concern is that, once the government files it response and cross- motion, the plaintiffs will not be in a conciliatory frame of mind. While we attorneys are used to being the subject of adversarial filings, putting that behind us, and still dealing with one another, it is harder for lay- people. So, if there is a path to settlement, we should do everything in our power to settle it now. I have no desire to be in an adversarial posture with the plaintiffs. Let me know if I can be of any assistance. I will draft up a motion/notice for the Court and share with you. From: Paul Cassell [mailto:[email protected] Sent: Saturda Au ust 20 2016 4:45 PM : ra wars To pa o

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00211579
Pages
2
Persons
2
Integrity
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.