Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00211672DOJ Data Set 9Other

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 378 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/31/2016 Page 1 of 3

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 378 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/31/2016 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BEFORE U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court on referral by the presiding U.S. District Judge for the undersigned to conduct a settlement conference (DE 374). Having held a status conference on the matter and being otherwise fully advised, the Court ORDERS as follows: 1. Conference Date: A settlement conference shall be held as follows: BEFORE: U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon DATE: Monday, May 23, 2016 TIME: 9:30 A.M. PLACE: U.S. Courthouse 701 Clematis Street West Palm Beach, FL 33401 4th Floor, Courtroom 3 2. Mandatory Attendance: Parties and their lead counsel must personally appear at the conference. An individual with full and complete

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00211672
Pages
3
Persons
0
Integrity

Summary

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 378 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/31/2016 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BEFORE U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court on referral by the presiding U.S. District Judge for the undersigned to conduct a settlement conference (DE 374). Having held a status conference on the matter and being otherwise fully advised, the Court ORDERS as follows: 1. Conference Date: A settlement conference shall be held as follows: BEFORE: U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon DATE: Monday, May 23, 2016 TIME: 9:30 A.M. PLACE: U.S. Courthouse 701 Clematis Street West Palm Beach, FL 33401 4th Floor, Courtroom 3 2. Mandatory Attendance: Parties and their lead counsel must personally appear at the conference. An individual with full and complete

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 378 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/31/2016 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE 1 and JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BEFORE U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court on referral by the presiding U.S. District Judge for the undersigned to conduct a settlement conference (DE 374). Having held a status conference on the matter and being otherwise fully advised, the Court ORDERS as follows: 1. Conference Date: A settlement conference shall be held as follows: BEFORE: U.S. Magistrate Judge Dave Lee Brannon DATE: Monday, May 23, 2016 TIME: 9:30 A.M. PLACE: U.S. Courthouse 701 Clematis Street West Palm Beach, FL 33401 4th Floor, Courtroom 3 2. Mandatory Attendance: Parties and their lead counsel must personally appear at the conference. An individual with full and complete authority to negotiate and finalize a settlement for each party must be present. Such mandatory appearance is intended to increase the effectiveness of the conference. As such, failure to produce the appropriate person(s) or 1 EFTA00211672 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 378 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/31/2016 Page 2 of 3 failure to participate in good faith may result in an award of costs, attorney fees, or other appropriate sanctions. 3. Pm-Conference Settlement Efforts: Prior to the settlement conference, the parties shall negotiate and make a good faith effort to settle the case without the Court's involvement. Proposals and counter proposals shall be made. If settlement is not achieved, the parties shall be prepared to engage in further good faith negotiation at the conference. 4. Confidential Settlement Memoranda: Each party or their counsel shall email to Chambers ([email protected]), but not file, a candid memorandum of five pages or less with its respective views in the light most favorable to its client, as well as any proposed settlement amount(s), citation to legal authority, or additional information that will be helpful to the Court in preparing for the conference. Each memorandum shall include a specific recitation of relevant facts, a discussion of case strengths and weaknesses, and a report on the parties' pm-conference settlement efforts outlined above. If not already part of the record, copies of any critical agreements, business records, photographs, or other documents shall be attached to the memorandum. The memoranda shall be emailed on or before 5:00 P.M. EST on Monday, May 16, 2016. Each party or their counsel shall indicate what portions of the submissions, if any, may be shared with opposing counsel at the conference. Otherwise, the information will not be shared. All party submissions pertaining to settlement will be returned to counsel after the conference. 5. Conference Format: The Court will generally use a mediation format: a joint session with opening presentations by the Court and each side followed by private caucusing by the Court with each side. The Court expects counsel and all party representatives to be fully prepared to participate. 2 EFTA00211673 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 378 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/31/2016 Page 3 of 3 6. Proposed Settlement Agreements: Each party's counsel shall bring to the conference a flash drive containing a proposed settlement agreement. 7. Intervenor Parties: This Order applies only to Petitioners and Respondent. As to those individuals and entities that have been permitted to intervene in this lawsuit, the Court is awaiting further legal briefing on the presence and participation of such intervenors in this settlement conference process. After receipt and review of such briefing, the Court will issue any orders it deems appropriate with regard to the intervening parties. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach in the Southern District of Florida, this 31st day of March, 2016. DAVE LEE LEE BRANNON U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3 EFTA00211674

Technical Artifacts (2)

View in Artifacts Browser

Email addresses, URLs, phone numbers, and other technical indicators extracted from this document.

Case #9:08-CV-80736-KAM

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 217 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/13/2010 Page 1 of 7

7p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Subjec

Fr • < > Subjec :Deliberative t Process ec aratton rom am Justice - equest or wo ee xtension Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 17:59:47 +0000 Importance: Normal We have no objection, provided we get the following accommodation, which you already anticipated. We would request that your motion for extension of time give us an extension on our reply document, such that our reply would be due 10 days after the main Justice Department declaration that will be coming in two weeks. If you would include such language as well in any proposed order, saving us (and the court) drafting time, that would be very much appreciated. Paul Cassell and Brad Edwards for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 Paul G Cassell CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message along with any/all attachments is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message

2p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Nlatthewman JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. DECLARATION OF IN SUPPORT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein. 2. I am the Assistant United States Attorne

5p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372112011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

STATEMENT BY ALAN DERSHOWITZ

3p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.