Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00211846DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: FW: Motion

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00211846
Pages
1
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From. To: Cc: Subject: FW: Motion Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:16:31 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Motion to Correct Sentence.wpd Here is Roy's e-mail with his draft. I would prefer that they provide the judge with a prepared order, but it is what it is. I am going to contact the person at PBSO in charge of work release to ask the following: (I) who should receive notice if there are misstatements in Mr. Epstein's application for work release? And (2) all of Mr. Epstein's victims are going to be notified of the work release, if any of them wish to be heard on the issue, to whom should they address their concerns? Any objections? Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 -----Original Message-- From: Roy BLACK Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 1:34 PM To: Subject: Re: Motion ere is our motion to correct the sentence. As you can see Judge Pucillo is a retired judge who only handled McSorley's docket that day. Since the pl

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From. To: Cc: Subject: FW: Motion Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:16:31 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Motion to Correct Sentence.wpd Here is Roy's e-mail with his draft. I would prefer that they provide the judge with a prepared order, but it is what it is. I am going to contact the person at PBSO in charge of work release to ask the following: (I) who should receive notice if there are misstatements in Mr. Epstein's application for work release? And (2) all of Mr. Epstein's victims are going to be notified of the work release, if any of them wish to be heard on the issue, to whom should they address their concerns? Any objections? Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 -----Original Message-- From: Roy BLACK Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 1:34 PM To: Subject: Re: Motion ere is our motion to correct the sentence. As you can see Judge Pucillo is a retired judge who only handled McSorley's docket that day. Since the plea had to be done on that day due to our agreement Judge Pucillo handled it. Epstein's case has always been in division W which is McSorley and McSorley's order says all division W cases for work release are in the discretion of the sheriff. Also Jack says McSorley entered the new sentencing order without notice to anyone and in fact he didn't know it until this matter came up. >>> ' (USAFLS)" Hi Roy - can you email the motion to and I before it is filed? Thank you. 12/4/2008 12:51 PM >>> EFTA00211846

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 10CorrespondenceUnknown

EFTA Document EFTA01659959

0p
DOJ Data Set 10OtherUnknown

EFTA01657328

2p
DOJ Data Set 11OtherUnknown

EFTA02662396

1p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS FGJ 07-103(WPB) DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 UNITED STATES' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE OVERSIZED RESPONSE TO MOTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO INTERVENE AND TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS AND CROSS-MOTION TO COMPEL UNDER SEAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS FGJ 07-103(WPB) DUCES TECUM NUMBERS OLY-63 and OLY-64 UNDER SEAL UNITED STATES' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE OVERSIZED RESPONSE TO MOTION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN TO INTERVENE AND TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS AND CROSS-MOTION TO COMPEL The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Motion for Permission to File an Oversized Response, and, in support thereof, states: 1. Movant Jeffrey Epstein, by and through counsel, filed a Motion to Intervene and to Quash two grand jury subpoenas duces tecum on July

2p
Court UnsealedSep 9, 2019

Epstein Depositions

10. 11. 12. l3. 14. 16. 17. l8. 19. Jeffrey Epstein v. Bradley J. Edwards, et Case No.: 50 2009 CA Attachments to Statement of Undisputed Facts Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein taken March 17, 2010 Deposition of Jane Doe taken March 11, 2010 (Pages 379, 380, 527, 564?67, 568) Deposition of LM. taken September 24, 2009 (Pages 73, 74, 164, 141, 605, 416) Deposition ofE.W. taken May 6, 2010 (1 15, 1.16, 255, 205, 215?216) Deposition of Jane Doe #4 (32-34, 136) Deposition of Jeffrey Eps

839p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Rol Slack lir „kite'

Rol Slack lir „kite' 2/949 Arcrwite a." 2434 7 Antai, Liu) 3 cut, , 4,/e EFTA00183732 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP AND AfilL/ArtO PART/H.3We; ' Cntercup Cantor 163 East 53'd Street New York, New York 10022-4611 WNW rwerA.COM September 2, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE (56D 820-8777 United States Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Re:Jeffrey Bpstein Dear • Facsimile: In response to your letter dated August 26, 2008, I am confirming that Mr. Goldberger should continue to be listed as the contact pawn in the' mended victim notification letters and should receive the carbon copies of thoso letters as they are sent. • Also, we plan on speaking to Mr. Josofsberg this week to discuss a procedure for paying his fees. We intend to comply fully with the agreement and Mr. Epstein will pay Mr. Josfsberg's usual and customary hourly rates for his work pursuant to the agreement facilitating settlements unde

136p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.