Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00212029DOJ Data Set 9

Subject: Fw: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL

Other

From: To: Subject: Fw: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:12:51 +0000 Importance: Normal From: To: Sent: Thu Jun 17 18:10:09 2010 Subject: Re: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL You should have told me that when we spoke on the phone and I would not have wasted your time or mine. Please can you explain why npa is still pending? Is it because he is still under house confinement? And when (please give me a date), will you will answer my questions? Thank you. I feel strongly that having USAG abstain from answering these questions in a child sex trafficking case of this magnitude is not positive and at best a Pyrrhic victory for those whose job it is to uphold justice and our laws. At the end of the day public opinion will carry its own weight since it is always on the side of truth and justice. Laws that by the way the usag are supposed to uphold. Thank you Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry From: Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:03:19 -0400 To: Cc: Subject: Re: PRI

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00212029
Pages
3
Persons
1
Integrity
Loading document viewer...

Ask AI About This Document

0Share
PostReddit
Review This Document

Forum Discussions

Advertisement

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,500+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, donor-supported, and independent. Donors see no ads.

Support This ProjectSupported by 1,550+ people worldwide
Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.