Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00212029DOJ Data Set 9Other

Subject: Fw: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL

Date
Unknown
Source
DOJ Data Set 9
Reference
EFTA 00212029
Pages
3
Persons
2
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: To: Subject: Fw: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:12:51 +0000 Importance: Normal From: To: Sent: Thu Jun 17 18:10:09 2010 Subject: Re: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL You should have told me that when we spoke on the phone and I would not have wasted your time or mine. Please can you explain why npa is still pending? Is it because he is still under house confinement? And when (please give me a date), will you will answer my questions? Thank you. I feel strongly that having USAG abstain from answering these questions in a child sex trafficking case of this magnitude is not positive and at best a Pyrrhic victory for those whose job it is to uphold justice and our laws. At the end of the day public opinion will carry its own weight since it is always on the side of truth and justice. Laws that by the way the usag are supposed to uphold. Thank you Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry From: Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:03:19 -0400 To: Cc: Subject: Re: PRI

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: To: Subject: Fw: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:12:51 +0000 Importance: Normal From: To: Sent: Thu Jun 17 18:10:09 2010 Subject: Re: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL You should have told me that when we spoke on the phone and I would not have wasted your time or mine. Please can you explain why npa is still pending? Is it because he is still under house confinement? And when (please give me a date), will you will answer my questions? Thank you. I feel strongly that having USAG abstain from answering these questions in a child sex trafficking case of this magnitude is not positive and at best a Pyrrhic victory for those whose job it is to uphold justice and our laws. At the end of the day public opinion will carry its own weight since it is always on the side of truth and justice. Laws that by the way the usag are supposed to uphold. Thank you Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry From: Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:03:19 -0400 To: Cc: Subject: Re: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL Since the non prosecution agreement is still pending, we cannot make any comment. Jeff From: To: Sent: Thu Jun 17 18:48:44 2010 Subject: PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL Hello =I, Thank you for callin me today. I am confused about certain legal issues. When I asked Marie Villafana this morning why Epstein was not charged with child sex trafficking given the 2000 TVPA federal laws, she did not want to respond. It s an important question that merits a substantial answer. In light of the arguments surrounding the case I would like to know: EFTA00212029 I. Why was prostitution? Epstein allowed to plead guilty to a single count of solicitation of minors to engage in 2. In light of the 5 trafficking offenses outlined on pages 1 & 2 of the NPA signed 10/29/07, why was Epstein given a twelve (12) months and six (6) months in a county jail (he served only 13 months), for all charges without adjudication or sentencing, and without probation or community control? 3. Unlike any other registered sex offender in the U.S. prison system today why didn't he serve time in a State penitentiary? Why was Epstein placed in a solitary cell at the West Palm Beach Stockade and only part time? Why was he allowed to go to "work" outside of prison for 13 months during the entire day? 4. Why didn't Epstein like all other registered sex offenders in the U.S. have an attached electronic monitor during his house confinement? 5. Why was prosecution for the offenses deferred in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida? 6. In the ADDENDUM to the NPA (7A-C), Epstein is given the right to select and approve independent third party counselors for the victims. Why? 7.According to the NPA signed by MV there are 5 federal trafficking offenses. Why were they dismissed or deferred? 8. Why is Epstein given the right to contest damages up to an amount agreed to between the victims and Epstein? 9. Esptein's signature on NPA "is not to be construed as an admission of civil or criminal liability or a waiver of..." Please explain. Why? 10. What was the "gain time" Epstein earned during his period of incarceration? 11. Why would the NPA not be part of a public record? And why would the US have to provide notice to Epstein before making disclosure under a FOIA request? 12. Why was the Federal Grand Jury investigation suspended? 13. Wh the the US t ee not to institute an criminal cha _es tainst his co conspirators in light of the evidence? 14. Why are the grand jury subpoenas going to be withdrawn at the completion of the terms of the NPA? given that he is a registered sex offender and that most probably he will commit the crimes shortly after his release next month (this assumption based on empirical and medical data obtained from registered sex offenders), there seems to be no protection mechanism for the victims in place? 15. Why was JE allowed to choose the attorney's for the victims and put a cap on their restitution? 16. Why was the Federal investigation stopped by the USAG? 17. Why hasn't Epstein been rearrested given the 11+ parole violations reported to the parole board since his home confinement including weekly trips to NY and helicpter ride to travel only 9 miles? Sincerely, EFTA00212030 The message and any attachment may be confidential or privileged and is intended only for the individual or entity identified above as the addressee. If you are not the addressee, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, you are not authorized to read, copy or distribute this message or any attachments and we ask that you please delete this message and any attachments and notify the sender by return email. Delivery of this message and any attachments to any person (s) is not intended in any way to waive confidentially or a privilege. EFTA00212031

Related Documents (6)

DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-MarratIVIatthewman JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF FILING THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Pursuant to the Court's June 18, 2013 Omnibus Order (DE 190), the Respondent, United States of America, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Third Supplemental Privilege Log. The index has been marked with Bates Numbers P-014924 thru P-015267. The documents referenced in the Third Supplemental Privilege Log will be delivered tomorrow to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex parte in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Order. Respectfully submitted, WIFREDO A. FERRER UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: s/A. Marie Villafafia A. MARIE VILLAFAFIA Assistant United States Attorney Florida Bar No. 0018255 500 South Australian Ave, Suite 40

446p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Denber

From: Sent: Trair Denber , 7 .11:57 AM To: Subject: : Itr rom en Starr Thank you. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Phone 561 209-1047 Fax 561 820-8777 From: Lourie, Andrew Sen : Th r a Decem er 06 2007 11:53 AM To: Subject: RE: ltr rom Ken Starr Alice and Alex are talking directly I don't think a decision has been made yet about whether there will be a meeting From:J~FI [maiho Sent: u y, r , 11:20 AM To: Lourle, Andrew Subject FW: Kr from Ken Starr Hi Andy — I am sure you received this already, but thought I should send, just in case. Is there going to be a meeting? If so, do you know when it NA ill occur? lie is saying what they have always said "we want to keep the agreement. so long as we get rid of all the stuff we don't like." Thanks. Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 S. Australian Ave. Suite 400 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Phone Fax 561 820-8777 From: i) 1 Sent:Thursday, December , 007 11:04 AM 2401

12p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 0372172011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 1. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S MOTION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NOT TO WITHHOLD RELEVANT EVIDENCE COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to move for an order from this Court directing the U.S. Attorney's Office not to suppress material evidence relevant to this case. The Court should enter an order, as it would in other criminal or civil cases, requiring the Government to make appropriate production of such evidence to the victims. BACKGROUND In discussions with the U.S. Attorney's Office about this case, counsel for Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 inquired about whether the Office would voluntarily provide to the victims information in its possession that was mater

15p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

(USAFLS)

(USAFLS) From: Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 4:25 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: draft letter to DAG I t.'"...1. ;Or • > EXHIBIT B-127 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-014941 57 EFTA00224728 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida Airs: Assistant LAS Auorney 99N.& eth Street Aftam: Ft 33132 (305) 961-9100 DELIVERY BY FEDERAL EXPRESS June 2, 2008 Honorable Mark Filip Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Judge Filip, Jeffrey Epstein is a part-time resident of Palm Beach County, Florida. In 2006, the Federal Bureau of Investigation began investigating allegations that, over a two-year period, Epstein paid approximately 28 minor females from Royal Palm Beach High School to come to his house for sexual favors. In July 2006, the matter was presented to AUSA A. Marie Villafana of our West Palm Beach b

14p
DOJ Data Set 9OtherUnknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-CI V-Marra/Matthewman JANE DOE # I and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, I UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' FIRST REOUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO THE GOVERNMENT The United States (hereinafter the "government") hereby responds to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2's First Request for Admissions to the Government Regarding Questions Relevant to Their Pending Action Concerning the Crime Victims Rights Act (hereinafter the "Request for Admissions"), and states as follows:' I. The government admits that the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO") conducted an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") and developed evidence and information in contemplation of a potential federal prosecution against Epstein for many federal sex offenses. Except as otherwise admitted above, the government denies Request No. I. The government's res

65p
Court UnsealedOct 21, 2019

Epstein NPA

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 48-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2011 Page 1 of 15 JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2’S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIME VICTIMS’ RIGHTS ACT AND REQUEST FOR A HEARING ON APPROPRIATE REMEDIES CASE NO: 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson EXHIBIT E Case Document 48-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2011 Page 2 of 15 IN RE: 1 INVESTIGATION OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN I IT APPEARING that the City of Palm Beach Police Department and the State Attorney?s Of?ce for the 1

15p

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.