Skip to main content
Skip to content
Case File
efta-efta00212040Other

From: "

Date
Unknown
Source
Reference
EFTA 00212040
Pages
1
Persons
0
Integrity
No Hash Available

Summary

From: " Subject: RE: Jane Doe Reply re FBI Subpoena.pdf Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:02:50 +0000 Importance: Normal I sent an e-mail to Jason on April 7, asking him to confirm that no sworn statements were taken from any of the six persons listed in the subpoena, prior to sending a letter to plaintiffs' counsel. I received no response for the next two days. On April 12, I received an e-mail from FBI paralegal, asking me the status of the matter. When I told her what I had done previously, she contacted Jason and he sent me a confirmation e-mail that no sworn statements were taken. I am preparing a letter to plaintiffs' counsel advising them of that fact. Assuming that 302's were prepared, what is your view on whether they can be released to plaintiffs in the civil case? Could that jeopardize any on-going investigation? From: Sent: Tuesda April 13, 2010 9:53 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: lane Doe Reply re FBI Subpoena.pdf Hi - This just came via CM/ECF. Has anyone told the p

Tags

eftadataset-9vol00009
Ask AI about this document

Search 264K+ documents with AI-powered analysis

Extracted Text (OCR)

EFTA Disclosure
Text extracted via OCR from the original document. May contain errors from the scanning process.
From: " Subject: RE: Jane Doe Reply re FBI Subpoena.pdf Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:02:50 +0000 Importance: Normal I sent an e-mail to Jason on April 7, asking him to confirm that no sworn statements were taken from any of the six persons listed in the subpoena, prior to sending a letter to plaintiffs' counsel. I received no response for the next two days. On April 12, I received an e-mail from FBI paralegal, asking me the status of the matter. When I told her what I had done previously, she contacted Jason and he sent me a confirmation e-mail that no sworn statements were taken. I am preparing a letter to plaintiffs' counsel advising them of that fact. Assuming that 302's were prepared, what is your view on whether they can be released to plaintiffs in the civil case? Could that jeopardize any on-going investigation? From: Sent: Tuesda April 13, 2010 9:53 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: lane Doe Reply re FBI Subpoena.pdf Hi - This just came via CM/ECF. Has anyone told the plaintiffs that we don't have anything responsive to their subpoena? « File: Jane Doe Reply re FBI Subpoena.pdf » EFTA00212040

Forum Discussions

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.

Annotations powered by Hypothesis. Select any text on this page to annotate or highlight it.