Subject: RE: Epstein questions

From: To: Cc: Subject: RE: Epstein questions Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:47:59 +0000 Importance: Normal You may want to refer them to this transcript. It isn't available through PACER yet, but it is supposed to be available from PACER tomorrow. It addresses the first question. This is the hearing on Epstein's motion to stay the civil proceedings. Judge Marra asked us to appear as Amicus Curiae. TRANSCRIPT of Motion to Stay held on 06/12/09 before Judge Kenneth A. Marra, Court File 08-CV-80119- Marra. [DE 180] From: Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 4:23 PM To: Cc: Su From: Sent: Monda September 21, 2009 4:23 PM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Re: Epstein questions OK. On 9/21/09 4:22 PM, > wrote: HI Thanks for your email. We cannot comment on your questions. Thank you for checking with me. EFTA00212108 Special Counsel to the US Attorney. From: Randy Schultz [mailto:rschultz pbpost.corn] Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 4:17 PM To: USAFLS) Subject: Epstein questions 1 — Why did the office agree to help broker civil lawsuit settlements? 2 — Why weren't the victims notified? 3 — Is there any precedent for this type of deal with an individual, as opposed to a corporation? I realize that Mr is now at FIU. I left a separate message. And I left a voice mail for Ms.I As noted, this is for an editorial tomorrow. EFTA00212109